FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: RPI 2010 Off-Season Thread IV -- It's Looking Like No "I-V" Is Necessary!
Re: RPI 2010 Off-Season Thread IV -- It's Looking Like No "I-V" Is Necessary!
I would assume it to be the 2nd of three scenarios. Did they count Zarbo as such after his year of ineligibility due to transferring?
Re: RPI 2010 Off-Season Thread IV -- It's Looking Like No "I-V" Is Necessary!
The article states that RPI returns 15 forwards, 3 dmen, and 3 goalies. Something doesn't add up correctly. Assuming that Greg Burgdoerfer is being counted as a returnee, we have lost a defenseman. If GB is not counted as a returnee then Beauregard is still counted as a forward.
OTOH, it might just be a typo.
I would assume it to be the 2nd of three scenarios. Did they count Zarbo as such after his year of ineligibility due to transferring?