Hoping to get the thread off the second page should we fire the coach, should we stick with semesters, who's the starting goalie going to be, any thoughts on abortion, whats everyone think about gun control and the Second Amendment
GO TIGERS
Hoping to get the thread off the second page should we fire the coach, should we stick with semesters, who's the starting goalie going to be, any thoughts on abortion, whats everyone think about gun control and the Second Amendment
GO TIGERS
You got the talent boys, rest of this year is about if your willing to outwork your opponents...
I think that can be said of a lot of recruits coming in. I don't follow the recruiting scene really at all outside of this forum, but it seems like most of the players we get put up numbers in juniors. So as a fan who never follows those leagues and has never seen them play, I (and I assume a large number of RIT fans aside from Tom) have absolutely no idea what kind of player they will turn out to be when they get here. I'm sure the coaching staff has a pretty good idea how they'll fit in and what their role will likely be early on, but most of us do not, necessarily, until we see the results. I can recall at least a couple of times where a freshman came in with junior numbers and got himself a few goals in his first game or two, leading to a belief (by us who don't know any better) that he might be the next top-line star. More often than not, he doesn't end up being that guy, but what we didn't know is that it was never the plan. He just had an aberration of a great game or two right out of the gate. So some of those are unfairly painted as "disappointments", when really they weren't....was that some recruits that seemed highly touted (unless I am misremembering things) becoming excellent role players.
I agree that they have a bunch of talent, but they either don't have enough game-plan-disrupting talent at the top end or the guys that would be that aren't having very good years. Although right now I'm not sure how much that theory holds out. Last season Brown was without a doubt in that category with Powell certainly in the conversation as well, but the team didn't do well at all. This year, the team has looked very good (more often than not), despite the facts that Powell is gone (and arguably hasn't been replaced yet) and Brown is not having his best year by any means. A lot of very talented role players are stepping up and filling those voids... most of the time.
What happened to Drackett?
"Out with a lower body injury sustained last weekend" per WITR.
Any updates on Peacock?
I think the difference from last year to this was the breakout of Drackett putting up league average or better numbers (something all 3 goalies failed to do last year) and our defense playing a more responsible two way game. The scoring really has not necessarily been there for us, and as you note we certainly do not have a line or even a player we can really count on when we really need to get something going. Instead, we need our D and goalie to make sure we never end up in a situation like that.
Andriano looked pretty good last night, too. Safe to say Shorty is probably never seeing action again except to clean up a blowout.
I am a huge fan of the free student nights. You've got a big building, and it's tough to fill. You're not turning away paying customers by giving students free tickets, so in my mind it's a no brainer, especially when you take into account concessions.
I agree it's good to get the students in the building, but giving away tickets is not quite a no-brainer. The main objection is that it devalues paid tickets; people (in this case, students) become less likely to pay full price for tickets in the future, as they figure they can just wait for free ones to come around again. Many minor league pro teams have encountered this problem, such as the Knighthawks before Styres' ownership.
Powers &8^]
I agree it's good to get the students in the building, but giving away tickets is not quite a no-brainer. The main objection is that it devalues paid tickets; people (in this case, students) become less likely to pay full price for tickets in the future, as they figure they can just wait for free ones to come around again. Many minor league pro teams have encountered this problem, such as the Knighthawks before Styres' ownership.
Powers &8^]
I agree it's good to get the students in the building, but giving away tickets is not quite a no-brainer. The main objection is that it devalues paid tickets; people (in this case, students) become less likely to pay full price for tickets in the future, as they figure they can just wait for free ones to come around again. Many minor league pro teams have encountered this problem, such as the Knighthawks before Styres' ownership.
Powers &8^]