There also were some coordination issues, with them playing when music was playing or the RIT cheer was started, but I give them a pass on that. At least I believe RIT needs to do a better job of working another pep band into the game. I do love having another schools pep band at a game…
And I would like the record to show it was the CLARKSON fans who yelled "HALFTIME!".
Also for the record and on the opinion side, I was a little unimpressed at the behavior of the Clarkson pep band. I’ve been watching college hockey since 98 and seen and heard a lot. I’ve seen pep bands participate in colorful cheers with the student section and I am fine with that going on. Even though I agree with them that I think our pep band is mature enough to go “unplugged”, I thought it was a little unclassy for them to be poking fun at the RIT pep band when they (meaning Clarkson’s pep band) were invited guests playing at RIT’s arena.
As I said this is college hockey and I have thick skin, but I do think an official pep band is more representative of the institute they are from and therefore should be held at a higher standard and should not be disrespectful towards another pep band. It was justice, and funny to see that not so horizontally challenged loud mouth with the hat mess up his trumpet solo.
There also were some coordination issues, with them playing when music was playing or the RIT cheer was started, but I give them a pass on that. At least I believe RIT needs to do a better job of working another pep band into the game. I do love having another schools pep band at a game…
If they win at all, WITR guys should put their stat guy on what RIT’s record is in the D-I era when allowing 40 or more shots.
The excuse "RIT was on break" is unacceptable because so was Clarkson and they showed up in mass on the road and on break.
And students were kicked out of the dorms.
OK this is going to come across as one of those "when I was your age" posts, so read it at your peril. I was a leading member of the Corner crew from 1983-1989, and then took a less-involved position, sitting next to them from 1990-1994 when they finally kicked my *** up to the pressbox.
The first few years was a free-for all. Not a lot of organization but we were loud, obnoxious and mean. There was a lot of individual insults yelled loud enough for most to hear, especially the players since we were hanging over the glass. Really vile stuff, sometimes bad enough to encourage a player to go at us. Middle fingers were big and constant. Other, er, body thrusts, hand gestures, etc. were also common. Fans from other teams would force their way into the corner crew and fights broke out. That had to run its course, eventually. We eventually got more organized - I remember early meetings in the RITSkeller (now the SportsZone or whatever the hell it's called) where we handed out paper with the cheers spelled out. But that was considered a compliment to the vulgar stuff we were still yelling somewhat individually.
I think that's what's lacking. Someone would have a creative idea that was in the context of the game and the opponent, and we would go with it We had some base cheers but at least 1/2 of the stuff was made up on the spot. The context of the cheers did center around the opponent, and we assigned different stereotypes for them.
For example:
1. Elmira - Drunk, ugly, unemployed rednecks that have sex with their sisters.
2. Plattsburgh - Criminals.
3. Union - Frat boys who were more than just friends with each other.
4. Geneseo - Smurfs. RIT wanna-be's. Easy coeds."Save the Bear".
5. Canisius - Ghetto school. Our ***** when it came to hockey.
6. SUNY schools - "State Schools Suck! Welfare College!"
7. Schools from the East - Stuck up preppies. Fat easy girls.
8. Schools from the West - Inferior podunks. Fat easy girls.
9 Referees - Wife beaters, closet lovers, their third eye was their best to see with.
10. Hobart - "**** brown coat!"
I'm not hearing a lot of this anymore directed at certain opponents.
I apologize for the lack of political correctness. Did I mention that the drinking age for some of this time was 18 some of us *may* have enjoyed a few adult beverages before during and after the game? Or that certain ex-members who now give a lot of money to the school used to run keggers out of their car in the parking lot between periods? I guess I shouldn't mention that. Never mind.
In summary, I don't know how much you can get away with anymore, but within the boundaries of what is possible, get creative, get spontaneous. Stop running the same plays and change it up based on what is going on in the game, and with the opponent/
Remember: "That's all right, that's ok, you're gonna work for us someday."
That's not true - while I agree most students were home, they are not kicked out of the dorms for Thanksgiving or Spring break. Christmas break is the only break where students are not allowed to stay in the dorms.
Band aside, of all the fan bases who have traveled to the Ritter in any sort of quantity, they certainly were among the biggest, number wise. And quite honestly, they were among the most arrogant, obnoxious, and ignorant bunch who have bothered to show up. Cornell fans, as rabid as they are, have a certain level of hockey intelligence. Same for several other schools. But as for Clarkson, not so much.
The excuse "RIT
was on break" is unacceptable because so was Clarkson and they showed up in mass on the road and on break...
The corner crew people are on here complaining about the Clarkson fans because the Corner crew lost the fan battle in their own rink. I was agitated by the Clarkson fans but
they have a right to cheer and play their music. The whole time I was wondering when the corner crew would show up. Even if the Corner Crew did show up we would hear the
same cheers, same routine etc...its like eating the same food over and over it gets boring. Complain all you want, the bottom line is you got worked in your own arena.
The fans across the rink from the Corner Crew were involved a little but not enough. The Corner Crew makes the atmosphere in the rink, no doubt. But not Friday against
Clarkson. I think it is time for the Corner Crew to recharge and bring something much more fun and exciting to the next home game. Maybe being a little obnoxious your self
will inspire the boys to play with more of an edge like they did a few years ago.
I am a RIT hockey fan and enjoy the Corner Crew. This is what I saw Friday night and over the last few years. I am not against you, I am with you and want the team to win.
The only reason I posted is because the obvious was not being stated "Clarkson fans made the game fun and not the Crew".
1. Elmira - Drunk, ugly, unemployed rednecks that have sex with their sisters.
2. Plattsburgh - Criminals.
3. Union - Frat boys who were more than just friends with each other.
4. Geneseo - Smurfs. RIT wanna-be's. Easy coeds."Save the Bear".
5. Canisius - Ghetto school. Our ***** when it came to hockey.
6. SUNY schools - "State Schools Suck! Welfare College!"
7. Schools from the East - Stuck up preppies. Fat easy girls.
8. Schools from the West - Inferior podunks. Fat easy girls.
9 Referees - Wife beaters, closet lovers, their third eye was their best to see with.
10. Hobart - "**** brown coat!
"
I'm not hearing a lot of this anymore directed at certain opponents.
Our stat guy? We have a stat guy? Cool!![]()
Did I mention that the drinking age for some of this time was 18 some of us *may* have enjoyed a few adult beverages before during and after the game? Or that certain ex-members who now give a lot of money to the school used to run keggers out of their car in the parking lot between periods? I guess I shouldn't mention that. Never mind.
In summary, I don't know how much you can get away with anymore, but within the boundaries of what is possible, get creative, get spontaneous. Stop running the same plays and change it up based on what is going on in the game, and with the opponent/
The administration has cracked down a lot. They want a family environment, and want a PG-rated corner crew so there is only so much that can be said. They won't allow the old "3 blind refs" cheer (which we made 4 blind refs when the added the 2nd ref), they won't allow anything with profanity, etc...it's hindering at times, especially when some of us know how bad other schools can get.
one usher who escaped with just an ugly look from me when she hassled my wife at the start of the 2nd period for her ticket that I had in my pocket. Is it really had to image a lady wearing an RIT outfit would be heading back to the RIT section in the second period?
I have seen my share of RIT hockey games and I was at the Clarkson game:
The atmosphere at the Ritter was great but that was because of the Clarkson pep band and fans. The RIT Pep band and Corner had about 30 people combined. The excuse "RIT
was on break" is unacceptable because so was Clarkson and they showed up in mass on the road and on break.
The band should recruit alumni to fill in the holes during breaks. I bet a lot of alumni would love to do it
Don't feel special about this Tom. My wife and I have had the same season tickets in the same section for 4 years at Cornell and we still need to show our tickets every time we enter the section. Even though the ushers have been the same people for that whole time! I have no idea what the Administration has stuck up their butt about that but it drives me crazy!![]()
If anyone wants to know why Defenseman are driving me to an early padded white room just watch the 3rd Clarkson goal. Was even coming back and then Shumway loses his guy after he blocks the shot. Then see three Golden Knight and 4 Tigers in front of Watson and the only Golden Knight to hit the ice did so by tripping over Watson... HIT SOMEBODY!!!! I don't even care if its legal at this point...
The highlights are up from the Clarkson game on YouTube. If anyone wants to know why Defenseman are driving me to an early padded white room just watch the 3rd Clarkson goal. Was even coming back and then Shumway loses his guy after he blocks the shot. Then see three Golden Knight and 4 Tigers in front of Watson and the only Golden Knight to hit the ice did so by tripping over Watson... HIT SOMEBODY!!!! I don't even care if its legal at this point...
Not to pile on here but, the first two Clarkson goals were a little nausea inducing too. The first goal through Watson's five-hole was ridiculous. I think Clarkson could have kicked a soccer ball through that huge hole. Watson barely moved. I don't think you can fault the defense on that one. The second goal wasn't exactly world-class either. Again, Watson didn't seem to react to the puck at all, like he didn't even see it. You could argue that defensive play(not necessarily just by defensemen) could have been better on that one.