What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

>>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Very nice article. Didn't realize that Eckenswiller went down for the season.

Coach Wilson was on John DiTulio's radio show tonite and mentioned that Eckenswiller may possibly return this year, that the decision would be made in the next few days.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

My preview of the RIT-Niagara games are up on the web site. The link is in my signature
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Today I am a Ryan Zapolski fan!

Tonight, I hope to see the Tigers give the Purps a proper welcome to the AHA. Go Tigers.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Last night's tie for Mercyhurst is sort of a win for RIT in that the Lakers took a point on Air Force where RIT swept all 4 points.

Hopefully, they can repeat or go further and get the win.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

So, why haven't we won a non-conference game yet? We've been chalking that up to a slow start on the Tigers' part, but maybe it's just that we can't beat good teams. We did sweep Mercyhurst, but that's starting to look like a fluke rather than a trend.

And why haven't we beaten Niagara since moving to D-I? Can't wait to play them three times next year...


Powers &8^]
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

So, why haven't we won a non-conference game yet? We've been chalking that up to a slow start on the Tigers' part, but maybe it's just that we can't beat good teams. We did sweep Mercyhurst, but that's starting to look like a fluke rather than a trend.

And why haven't we beaten Niagara since moving to D-I? Can't wait to play them three times next year...


Powers &8^]

I tend to agree with you that RIT might have gotten on this hot streak against bottom feeders. In my opinion its the lack of goal scoring by the forwards. RIT has out shot all these teams, but that doesn't mean much if they are low quality opportunities. To that point:

The only true shooter RIT has is Brenner and he is on the line with Favot and Mazzei. While they work hard the line lacks size and Mazzei doesn't have the skill of the other 2. I think its time to put Janda in and see what he can do on that line.

Change up the power play. RIT couldn't get pucks through from the point and that little cross crease pass that RIT always tries was money when it was Lambert and Smith but not so much any more.

When shots are blocked RIT didn't seem to have anyone up in the high slot to jump on those rebounds.

Some of the guys try to make 1 too many moves. Get the shot on net and drive hard and pick up the rebound. Crash the net and bang one home cause it doesn't seem to be happening any other way.

In fact shake up all the lines and pairings except for Matic and Alexin. They are the only ones that seem to be truly clicking right now.

Maybe I am just disappointed with losing to Niagara again but if RIT ever wants respect they have to start winning these OOC games.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Maybe I am just disappointed with losing to Niagara again but if RIT ever wants respect they have to start winning these OOC games.

You better watch yourself or some people will jump on you that any team outside of the AHA is great and it's wasn't that bad of a loss! :rolleyes:

How does any team that want to be taken seriously lose all of it's OOC games so far? Some people here can try to chalk them up to playing top teams or whatever, but that is crap. RIT lost to a two win team last night! That is horrible. The only way they were on that win streak is because they were playing, for the most part, bad AHA teams.

I still contend that RIT needs to start winning these OOC games with some consistency or they are going to continue to be looked at as a good AHA team and a fair (at best) DI team. :( I think RIT is stuck in a rut.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

It's a bit bizarre as in terms of the run of play, RIT has been as good as ever in OOC games this year, but they're not getting results. But, in the end, it can come down to getting a huge save or two, and then having a player who can bury opportunities in the clutch. I think Guimond/Lambert were a huge combo in flat out stealing games in their early days in D1. Now, the team as a whole is better, but you've got to bury chances and perform in the clutch. As an aside, Wilson was screaming at Burt for not being in front of the net in that last PP -- that's as upset as I can recall seeing him at a player during a game in my time watching RIT (I started following RIT when I was a freshman which was actually his first season coaching).

In defense of Niagara, their record doesn't necessarily represent how decent of a team they are -- results include 3-2 losses to Michigan and Cornell (OT). But, I didn't think they were impressive and RIT had the better of the play. But, their goaltender stood tall and they buried their chances. That's what it takes to win. RIT has two more OOC chances, and it's against a tougher team on the road, so we'll see if they can rebound.

(And, in the grand scheme of things, they can lose the next two, finally do something in the AHA tournament, and then win a OOC game or two, and I'll be totally happy.)
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Running a bit of Refreeing Damage control here:

If anyone knows the TV guys please explain to them that on the final play covering the puck with the glove is a Penalty for delay of game, and probably should have been called. But its only a penalty shot if the puck is in the crease. Thats a bit embarassing...

I looked at the Kneeing call on Alexin from the TV Broadcast. There is no question in my opinion it was a kneeing penalty. He clearly lead with the knee, and if you look at the angle they have from the corner he extended at the moment of impact.

Seems per the NCAA Rule book the Ref had to give a Major, see below from the NCAA Rulebook.

What criteria should be used in determining whether to assess a minor, major or disqualification penalty for kneeing?

RULING: A minor penalty
should be assessed in most situations. When the knee is used in a flagrant
or violent manner, a major penalty should be assessed. Whenever injury
results from fouling an opponent with a knee, a disqualification penalty
must be assessed.


Kneeing penalties may be assessed as minor, major or disqualification
penalties, even though physical contact with an opponent may not have
occurred.

Since the player was injured Alexin was done per the rule book that seems kind of silly. Any Knee to Knee contact is going to hurt. However, the NCAA is most likley going to go the safe route on this one. I am not saying its right, just thats how the rule reads. After reading it, I think Alexin is lucky and the ref did screw up, per the reading of the rule he probably should have gotten a DQ.

As for losing another none conference game, yeah its frustrating. But again RIT really deserved to win the game, they out played Niagara especially in the second. Just again to many little things added up. The biggest little thing was not finishing. You gotta find ways to put the puck in the net in games like this.

Good Example of little things. Tyler Brenner was RIT's best player with Burt close behind last night. Niagara could not handle him along the board, he won about every battle he had. Big negative though was when he got sucked into taken a penalty to negate a power play by Gotto late in the second. Just the kind of things that can't happen in a close Hockey game.

I would lay off the panic about the non-conference game. Young team this year and with the overall none conference record this year there is no way an at large big would be there. I am happy that RIT more than competed against all non-conference team they played and deserved better in many of the games. The wins will come, what the program has accomplished all ready is amazing, yeah I want more too...
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Running a bit of Refreeing Damage control here:

If anyone knows the TV guys please explain to them that on the final play covering the puck with the glove is a Penalty for delay of game, and probably should have been called.

Probably should have been called??? Absolutely should have been called - it was as obvious an intential cover of the puck as it gets. A faceoff in the Niagara zone with a two man advange (pulled goalie) and 8 or so seconds on the clock could have made a difference.

I wish the team had taken care of business on the power play - that, along with burning too much daylight on the PK, made the difference.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

As for losing another none conference game, yeah its frustrating. But again RIT really deserved to win the game, they out played Niagara especially in the second. Just again to many little things added up. The biggest little thing was not finishing. You gotta find ways to put the puck in the net in games like this.

I disagree. While the game was close I still thought Niagara out played RIT in the 1st and 3rd. They defintley had more speed and it was hard for RIT to contain. Their passing was better espcially on the power play. It really looked like we were scrambling out there. Niagara did a great job of blocking passing and shooting lanes and made it hard for us to get any qualitfy chances on net.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

It was a meaningless game for RIT, and the Tigers played that way. Niagara was motivated, at least, to try to salvage the season (according to Burkie) and played with some desperation to steal a game from a better (perhaps much better) team.

I won't jump off the bandwagon until I see a similarly uninspired performance in the BCA in the spring (or a failure to get there). Everything is still well on track ... stop jumping off guys! :)
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

It was a good game to lose, if there is such a thing. RIT's unbeaten streak wasn't going to last forever, and I'd rather learn last night's lessons now than in mid-January or later. RIT was slightly outplayed through most of the game - Niagara was quick to the puck and took away room from RIT. RIT can feel good about the second period, but not a whole lot else. The game was not meaningless to RIT and I don't think the coach went into it that way or else you would have seen all three goalies and a whole lot less of the first two lines.

Niagara showed some cockiness too, which was bold for a team with such an abysmal record.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

I would agree that it was not a meaningless game for RIT. I"m sure they wanted to send a message to them before they come into the conference next year.

The lack of forward scoring is starting to show up IMO. The defensemen helped cover that problem up by scoring so often, but sooner or later it was going to cost RIT. Burt needs to start scoring more. Brenner started out good after he came back, but hasn't scored since that weekend. I think we all expected bigger things from Murphy and Knowles this year and they aren't scoring much. Alexin and Matic are our "hot" players now.

I'm not going to concern myself with what other fans think of RIT. The reality is that most non-AHA fans don't think much of any of the teams outside of Air Force, and I think a lot of that has to do with Air Force's play in NCAA tournament action with close losses and a win. Non-conference wins won't change our reputation THAT much because, in part, AHA teams rarely get to play the truly top brand name teams like North Dakota, Minnesota, and Boston College.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Mercyhurst taking 3 points against Air Force this past weekend helped us a ton
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Let me clarify my "meaningless" comment. The Niagara game had zero impact on the ultimate goal for the season ... to make the NCAA tournament. I have heard Coach Wilson say that nobody remembers the regular season champs, but everyone remembers the team that gets the NCAA berth (and they get the national PR). The Niagara game was meaningless!

Now, I don't mean the team didn't care or want to win. My original comment was the game was meaningless and they played that way. I didn't expect them to play that way and I'm sure the coach didn't intend that.

The only way that game would have had any significant meaning is if someone got hurt seriously or if the loss hurt the team's psyche. I think, if anything, the loss helped the team's psyche and I don't think I saw any injuries.

For Niagara, on the other hand, their own coach said it was an important game for them to try to stop the bleeding and turn around the season. They were playing with a bit more of the playoff type desperation. It showed.

(Also to slightly defend the TV guys. I didn't see the broadcast or any replays, but I was also thinking that it could have been a penalty shot call. I am not a rules guru and would appreciate any clarification, but my understanding is that a penalty that takes away a clear scoring opportunity, like tripping on a breakaway, is what gets the penalty shot. That puck was very close to being teed up for a clean shot at the goal when the Niagara "player" dropped down with his glove on the puck and stayed there a while. If that is a delay of game penalty, and there was a clear scoring opportunity, then wouldn't a penalty shot be in order ... even outside the crease? I'm not sure that's what happened, but if it did???)
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Sounds like a lot of poor excuses to me. I still contend that for RIT's program to advance past where it is they need to start winning some OOC games more regularly. Along with winning the AHA tourney. It the next step in progression IMHO. RIT has shown it can contend almost immediately after moving to DI. I think the point of being happy with contending is past.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year

I think the game did matter (as if you couldn't tell by my previous posts). 2 years ago RIT was beating Cornell and Minnesota with players recruited to play D3. This season we couldn't muster a win again the last place team in what might be "the next worse" conference. In my eyes that's not the program making progress. Yeah it didn't matter for the standings but in just about every other aspect it does. I am really hopefully we take it to Minnesota State to give us a good start in 2010 and set us up to finish strong and take that momentum into the playoffs. No more "RIT deserved to win that game" excuses. If RIT deserves to win a game then they need to win it.

As far as covering the puck. If you cover it in the crease (as a player) its a penalty shot. If you purposely cover it anywhere else it should be a 2 minute delay of game penalty. Unless NCAA has different rules than either the NHL or USA hockey in this regard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top