What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Rep Retirement Lodge 85: Pants or no Pants?

Rep Retirement Lodge 85: Pants or no Pants?

  • Total voters
    43
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Rep Retirement Lodge 85: Pants or no Pants?

mookie1995 said:
ashamed to say i have never been to an ocb :o
Click to expand...

that's a proud accomplishment. :)

My buddy and I went there in high school. We were literally there at closing time. I was beyond done eating, but he was still gorging himself on those rolls they have. Finally, the manager is like dude, we're closed. A la Homer Simpson, he's like I haven't had all I can eat yet. The manager agreed to refund half his money and off we went.
 
Re: Rep Retirement Lodge 85: Pants or no Pants?

Jon said:
This is going to end poorly:

http://board.uscho.com/showpost.php?p=4403018&postcount=611

Someone needs to get this guy in touch with boot_walt_kyle. The universe might explode.
Click to expand...

Omigod - I was just coming over here to post about that guy. He's been in several HE team threads causing the same kind of trouble. Who the heck has the time to find posts like that?

Since were on the subject of Div I threads, did UNH and Miami play recently to warrant the "Revenge anyone?" thread?
 
Re: Rep Retirement Lodge 85: Pants or no Pants?

hockeybando said:
People are dumb.
Click to expand...
Considering the night I just had at work...I agree. Don't ask for clarification, my execs and SLPPD have said I can't talk about it (with good reason).

The best part is my opener should have had to deal with this, but Parise knows what she did today. I will be having a discussion with her on Wednesday.
 
Re: Rep Retirement Lodge 85: Pants or no Pants?

MinnesotaNorthStar said:
Considering the night I just had at work...I agree. Don't ask for clarification, my execs and SLPPD have said I can't talk about it (with good reason).

The best part is my opener should have had to deal with this, but Parise knows what she did today. I will be having a discussion with her on Wednesday.
Click to expand...

What did you do? Were you giving away free photos for sex or something? That's pretty bad, man. I know you have had a dry streak, but to prey upon lonely housewives developing their family's pictures? That's just low.
 
Re: Rep Retirement Lodge 85: Pants or no Pants?

Jon said:
This is going to end poorly:

http://board.uscho.com/showpost.php?p=4403018&postcount=611

Someone needs to get this guy in touch with boot_walt_kyle. The universe might explode.
Click to expand...
:D WOW!!! That guy is trolling for something. :D
MinnesotaNorthStar said:
Considering the night I just had at work...I agree. Don't ask for clarification, my execs and SLPPD have said I can't talk about it (with good reason).

The best part is my opener should have had to deal with this, but Parise knows what she did today. I will be having a discussion with her on Wednesday.
Click to expand...
Let me guess, pictures that DL would be taking into the bathroom after buying a bottle of lotion?? ;)
 
Re: Rep Retirement Lodge 85: Pants or no Pants?

Brenthoven said:
What did you do? Were you giving away free photos for sex or something? That's pretty bad, man. I know you have had a dry streak, but to prey upon lonely housewives developing their family's pictures? That's just low.
Click to expand...
Hey we're the store for 3 (well 2.5) country club areas. A lot of trophy wives. You'd do it too. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top