What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

There's also that little matter of those visits to Epstein's haunts and the sort of favors Epstein may have partially paid him with...

I am going to chose to believe he isnt a pedophile until proven otherwise...but man that would be quite the epic fall from grace.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

I think he is. He has been quoted as saying the true age of consent is 14.

They would have to be that young to consent to go with him. No one with a fully functioning brain would want to spend 20 minutes with him.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

They would have to be that young to consent to go with him. No one with a fully functioning brain would want to spend 20 minutes with him.

I think you drastically overestimate his capacities, unless that includes the time to drive from and to the playground.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

I think you drastically overestimate his capacities, unless that includes the time to drive from and to the playground.

Actually it includes the amount of time he will talk about himself. Most likely I underestimated :eek:
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">(reads tweet)<br>(douses all of Twitter with gasoline)<br>(reads tweet again to be sure)<br>(lights match) <a href="https://t.co/29VFojQXSJ">https://t.co/29VFojQXSJ</a></p>— Kevin M. Kruse (@KevinMKruse) <a href="https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1219335026967568389?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 20, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

LOL, you knew his people would tie anything MLK-related to rambling about the "witchhunt!" They are completely shameless.

It's exactly like the time Glenn Beck tried to tie Nazism to the word "empathy" when Obama used it in a speech.
 
Last edited:
LOL, you knew his people would tie anything MLK-related to rambling about the "witchhunt!" They are completely shameless.

I wonder if she and George share a room. Otherwise I’d think maybe he’d have rolled over on her and suffocated while sleeping
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Actually it includes the amount of time he will talk about himself. Most likely I underestimated :eek:

Of course. And there's also the necessary pep rally and motivational efforts before the game.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I will NEVER allow our great Second Amendment to go unprotected, not even a little bit!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1219351907627667456?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 20, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Even after having his hypocrisy put on TV and twitter for the world to see Alan Dershowitz goes on CNN and says that he's been making the same consistent argument since Nixon. So, Nixon, Clinton, and Trump. Yet, he directly stated in his ~1999 interview clip that an actual crime is not required for impeachment. Now, suddenly it is and has been since the 70's.

Is there NOT ONE person on Trump's side who has an ounce of integrity? Just one.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/20/poli...rump-defense-criminal-like-conduct/index.html

Washington (CNN)Constitutional lawyer Alan Dershowitz said in 1998 a president could be impeached even if they were not accused of a crime. Now that he's helping President Donald Trump's impeachment defense, he's saying something different.
In August 1998, during the summer leading up to then-President Bill Cinton's impeachment, Dershowitz argued that a president does not have to commit a "technical crime" in order for it to constitute impeachable conduct.
"It certainly doesn't have to be a crime if you have somebody who completely corrupts the office of president and who abuses trust and who poses great danger to our liberty, you don't need a technical crime," Dershowitz told "Larry King Live."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Jeffrey Toobin accuses his former law professor, Alan Dershowitz, of pretending to be “some sort of outside objective observer instead of Donald Trump’s lawyer.”<br><br>“No. I am an advocate against impeachment,” replied Dershowitz. “...I want the impeachment to fail.” <a href="https://t.co/0QjIWPZPHm">pic.twitter.com/0QjIWPZPHm</a></p>— Anderson Cooper 360° (@AC360) <a href="https://twitter.com/AC360/status/1218345819209961473?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 18, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

In the video of the tweet Alan exposes his contradiction for all to see.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

This video is even better. CNN is doing it side by side.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Dershowitzian hypocrisy. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Dershowitz?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Dershowitz</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AbuseOfPower?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AbuseOfPower</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Impeachment?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Impeachment</a> <a href="https://t.co/xYGpgrcquv">pic.twitter.com/xYGpgrcquv</a></p>— Pierre Atlas (@PierreAtlas) <a href="https://twitter.com/PierreAtlas/status/1219341515576741888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 20, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/01/ha...hes-alan-dershowitz-in-humiliating-hypocrisy/

Decent article on Laurence Tribe calling out Dershowitz's hypocrisy.

“The argument that only criminal offenses are impeachable has died a thousand deaths in the writings of all the experts on the subject, but it staggers on like a vengeful zombie,” Tribe explained. “In fact, there is no evidence that the phrase ‘high Crimes and Misdemeanors’ was understood in the 1780s to mean indictable crimes.”

He explained that there was virtually no federal criminal law even in place when the U.S. Constitution was authored by the founding fathers in 1787. he went on to quote former Virginia Gov. Edmund Randolph, who argued on July 20, 1787, that impeachment powers were important for cases exactly like Trump’s.

“Executive will have great opportunitys (sic) of abusing his power,” Tribe quoted Randolph.

“Even more famously, Alexander Hamilton in Federalist 65 defined ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’ as ‘those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust.’
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">MLK Day messages from 44 & 45: <a href="https://t.co/maWrxQpNWS">pic.twitter.com/maWrxQpNWS</a></p>— Jon Favreau (@jonfavs) <a href="https://twitter.com/jonfavs/status/1219376698057080832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 20, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top