rufus
rock and roller
She's still guilty - they'll find it somehow.
LOCK HER UP!11!!!1!1!!!
Doesn't matter. Donnie says they did, so who ya gonna believe?
She's still guilty - they'll find it somehow.
LOCK HER UP!11!!!1!1!!!
She's still guilty - they'll find it somehow.
LOCK HER UP!11!!!1!1!!!
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">GOP-led Senate committee probe found no evidence Ukraine interfered on Hillary Clinton's behalf in 2016 election: Report <a href="https://t.co/UguiRTTXTs">https://t.co/UguiRTTXTs</a></p>— Newsweek (@Newsweek) <a href="https://twitter.com/Newsweek/status/1201736591468830721?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 3, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
A central figure in the conspiracy claims is former Democratic National Committee consultant Alexandra Chalupa. A January 2017 Politico article revealed that Chalupa raised early concerns about former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort's close connections with Russia before he joined the campaign. However, the information Chalupa is thought to have shared was publicly available. The article stopped short of claiming anything in support of the conspiracy, saying there was "little evidence" of a "top down" effort to harm the Trump campaign.
Intelligence Committee Chairman Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) vowed to thoroughly investigate allegations of collusion by "either campaign" in 2017. The investigation of alleged Democratic collusion with Ukraine appears to have been fruitless, if the report is true.
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) doubled down Monday on his claim that Ukraine meddled in the 2016 election amid high-profile criticism of his remarks.
Kennedy, speaking to reporters in the basement of the Senate, pointed to news articles that he had printed out and was carrying along with handwritten notes.
"I based my comments to Chuck [Todd] on the reporting in the Politico magazine, on reporting in the Financial Times, The Economist, the Washington Examiner," Kennedy said. "You can get copies if you'd like from the office."
Kennedy read passages from a 2016 Financial Times article headlined "Ukraine’s leaders campaign against 'pro-Putin' Trump." He also referenced a headline from a 2018 New York Times story titled "Ukraine Court Rules Manafort Disclosure Caused 'Meddling' in U.S. Election."
The New York Times reported that a Ukrainian court found that officials broke the law when they disclosed alleged payments from a pro-Russia party in Ukraine to Paul Manafort, Trump's former campaign manager. The Ukraine district court, according to The New York Times, found that the violation "resulted in meddling in the electoral process of the United States."
What do you do when the head of the Department of Justice is the criminal?
Does anyone have a count of how many times Republicans brought up Chalupa during the House Intelligence Committee Impeachment Hearings? It had to be 100's. And, this is a Senate (run by Republicans) investigation clearing Chalupa?
...
Something doesn't square here. Why is the Senate not "going" with the House on the conspiracy? Senator Kennedy certainly has, in fact I heard he was sticking to his guns last night.
Apparently Kennedy found his "articles".
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate...wn-on-alleged-ukraine-meddling-amid-criticism
If I remember correctly the only reason Ukraine was "on Clinton's side" in the election is because Trump campaigned on "giving, letting them have it" Crimea to Russia.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sen. King on CNN: "I sat through 25 hearings, briefing, meetings, probably more, on the question of what happened in 2016. In none of those meetings was there ever a hint, a breath, a suggestion, a word that somehow Ukraine was involved in the 2016 election ... it was Russia." <a href="https://t.co/qLACZeeLgx">pic.twitter.com/qLACZeeLgx</a></p>— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) <a href="https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1201857388766285826?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 3, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Hey did you guys know NATO was formed to take advantage of the United States?
Macron switches to French when he does not want Trump to understand his comments.
Holy ****. Did he just threaten to attack a NATO member and key ally?
He could just stay in English.
Sans pichers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Thank you to Great Republican <a href="https://twitter.com/SenJohnKennedy?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SenJohnKennedy</a> for the job he did in representing both the Republican Party and myself against Sleepy Eyes Chuck Todd on Meet the Depressed!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1201543495539806208?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 2, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
You would think at some point Chuck Todd would get sick of this **** and stop placating to lying guests from the other side.
So they Dropped the Chalupa?![]()