What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

ROTFLMFAO. Obama would take it in a minute. He was sure he'd beat Trump if he ran. He wants to keep the job.


"The new guy is going to take away our rights* and lock up people that don't believe what he believes up. And he's **-ist filth!" -- 2008 or 2016?

As you said, all this is being put out there, then, now, to "dominates by dividing".
All the "change the adjectives and names" (see above) to the current era rhetoric is doing is just that.


*guns circa 2008 or flag burning circa 2016
** communist circa 2008 or fascist circa 2016

Or you could have keep both...
 
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

"The new guy is going to take away our rights* and lock up people that don't believe what he believes up. And he's **-ist filth!" -- 2008 or 2016?

It depends. Is the person in your example basing that statement on a consistent pattern of behavior or skin color?
 
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

It depends. Is the person in your example basing that statement on a consistent pattern of behavior or skin color?

You know what's funny? The left is the only one who gives three ****s what the dude looks like. The Marxist policies are why I didn't vote for Sotoero.
 
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

It depends. Is the person in your example basing that statement on a consistent pattern of behavior or skin color?

When you're out to rally to an it's-us-or-them! cause, does it matter? The listeners will hear what they want to hear. That's the ugly beauty of rhetoric.
 
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

ROTFLMFAO. Obama would take it in a minute.

No. He wouldn't. Fearing someone is a tyrant is not the same as the person being a tyrant, and all the flapdoodle about Obama's tyranny for the last 7 years was red meat thrown around to keep the minions frothing at the mouth.

Obama's been an honorable and law-abiding president, and this despite a near-treasonous campaign of sabotage embarked on by the GOP prior to his inauguration and lasting all the way until this 1/20. You'll never get it, but he's a good man who did a good job, and realizes what our government is about and has protected that.

People can argue about his policies, but his demeanor and the way he conducted the office are the best at least since Eisenhower, if not Cleveland.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

Actually, he did:
He talked about how the "other side" is always power-hungry demons out for the ruin of everyone "not them" but especially "your side" (aka the underdog on the side of the angels).

He pointed out how it's now all about people and personality (Obama, Trump) instead of Constitutional principles (checks and balances, prevention of accumulation of power).

He mentioned how back in the day some wanted to appoint Washington "king" and how "GW, The Original" said no one should serve more than two terms. Someone, anyone, with a straight face dare to tell me that either Obama or Trump would turn down kingship if offered.

Sorry.

1. The opposition to Trump is far more based in reality and far less to do with, "us vs. them"
2. The integrity gap between them is immense
3. Obama's allure far surpasses personality and he sure as s**t trumps Trump on Constitutional principles
4. Again Obama understands his role and would bow out gracefully.

As I said Beck doesn't have the balls to make an apt nor valid comparison.
 
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

Still confused how heading a council is a title of nobility.

That's because you're not swallowing a silly internet meme. What Flag is saying is completely without merit.
 
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

And a mere eight years ago so many were sure Obama would be a tyrant, before he'd ever taken the oath.

Obama's been an honorable and law-abiding president, and this despite a near-treasonous campaign of sabotage embarked on by the GOP prior to his inauguration and lasting all the way until this 1/20. You'll never get it, but he's a good man who did a good job, and realizes what our government is about and has protected that.

People can argue about his policies, but his demeanor and the way he conducted the office are the best at least since Cleveland.

I think this should be saved somewhere for reference because in four (or eight) years someone (Flag, Drew) will be rolling it out with just the name and party changed. Just like the stuff from eight years ago is rolling out today with the name and party changed.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

Still confused how heading a council is a title of nobility.

From the Constitution:

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.

The United Nations is a foreign state. Good luck finding where the Congressional permission was, because there wasn't.
 
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

I think this should be saved somewhere for reference because in four (or eight) years someone (Flag, Drew) will be rolling it out with just the name and party changed. Just like the stuff from eight years ago is rolling out today with the name and party changed.

Of course they will, but people saying something is not the same as that thing being real.

Hitler: the Jews are a menace!
Jews: Hitler is a menace!
Sicatoka: Well they're both using the same rhetoric, so it's a wash.
 
Of course they will, but people saying something is not the same as that thing being real.

Hitler: the Jews are a menace!
Jews: Hitler is a menace!
Sicatoka: Well they're both using the same rhetoric, so it's a wash.

That's what I read too.
 
Yes, but they need to be paying in as well, for the financial benefits of the expanded pool to be achieved, not just piggybacking on their parents' policies. .

Well, if they're piggy backing, presumably the parents are paying for them under a family plan or as an added dependent.
 
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

Obama wouldn't turn it down. Given he accepted head of the UN Security Council, which is unconstitutional.

Have any lawyers challenged the constitutionality of take a posting with the UN Security Council?

Pres. Obama served as part of the US delegation (Susan Rice, Rosemary DiCarlo, and Hillary Clinton were also on that delegation) for a single term in September 2009. He was representing the USA during our rotating term. Looking through a Google search, only Alex Jones and sucklers at his teat have ever tried to make hay of this. And don't think that if there were any merit to the unconstitutional claims you continue to make that the Republicans wouldn't have been all over it.
 
Actually, he did:
He talked about how the "other side" is always power-hungry demons out for the ruin of everyone "not them" but especially "your side" (aka the underdog on the side of the angels).

He pointed out how it's now all about people and personality (Obama, Trump) instead of Constitutional principles (checks and balances, prevention of accumulation of power).

He mentioned how back in the day some wanted to appoint Washington "king" and how "GW, The Original" said no one should serve more than two terms. Someone, anyone, with a straight face dare to tell me that either Obama or Trump would turn down kingship if offered.

Obama would turn it down in a heartbeat.

Trump it would depend on how many midnight tweets he made the night before. Then he'd change his mind a dozen times before breakfast anyway.
 
And a mere eight years ago so many were sure Obama would be a tyrant, before he'd ever taken the oath.



I think this should be saved somewhere for reference because in four (or eight) years someone (Flag, Drew) will be rolling it out with just the name and party changed. Just like the stuff from eight years ago is rolling out today with the name and party changed.

Nah, I realize both parties are hypocritical. Just because you have political leanings one way doesn't mean you need to have blind faith in the party that comes closest to representing them. I am well aware the Republican Party isn't going to cure all our ills just like the Democratic Party won't completely destroy the country if they're in power. Life will go on either way.
 
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

Well, if they're piggy backing, presumably the parents are paying for them under a family plan or as an added dependent.

As somebody doing this, (1) yes, they cost extra money, but (2) it's really cheap. So they're helping spread the cost a bit, but not as much as if they counted the same as Em and Pee.
 
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

Well, if they're piggy backing, presumably the parents are paying for them under a family plan or as an added dependent.

My family plan is $40 a month more than an employee + spouse plan. (of course, that is my cost, I'm not sure how much more it costs my employer)

you probably need these young healthy 20-somethings paying for an individual plan to make any significant contribution towards subsidize the healthcare of all the obese scooter riding diabetics, but this is better than them being uninsured and paying nothing in
 
Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: We Are So Totally F%*#ed

Of course they will, but people saying something is not the same as that thing being real.

You're right.
Words != Actions

But where are these "take my rights" actions that we were told Obama would do? I still have my firearms. And I'm yet to see a flag-burner in jail from a Trump action (albeit it is not Jan 20 yet either).

Until the rhetoric (and that's what all is) becomes actual action, it's, well, rhetoric. It's designed to incite, inflame, panic the herd, ... and get donations.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top