What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.65: I'm Just Here For The Lincoln Project Ads

Status
Not open for further replies.
F3QiNthXQAAybrv.jpg
Real power bottom energy...
 
Apparently, in a recent court filing in regards to the NY fraud case, Dementia Donnie changed the home address of six of his corporate entities from NY to Florida.
 
Apparently, in a recent court filing in regards to the NY fraud case, Dementia Donnie changed the home address of six of his corporate entities from NY to Florida.

People should expect to read more about the Fraudulent Transfer Act as Trump Family's judgments continue to gain weight.
 
He also predicted that America will lose WW3 to all the new superweapons in the arsenal of...Russia? China? Iran? Lmao.

“They’ll soon have us losing World War III. We won’t even be in World War III, we’ll be losing World War III with weapons the likes of which nobody has ever seen before...”
 
How many times has he stupidly said (I suppose 'stupidly' is redundant when describing anything he's said) "the likes of which..."?
 
He also predicted that America will lose WW3 to all the new superweapons in the arsenal of...Russia? China? Iran? Lmao.

Our military is so much better than everyone else's. No. They can't win. They could just destroy the entire planet including themselves, but no one is beating us in a war. Not gonna happen.
 
I probably haven’t earned the right to ask this, since I haven’t been following the case, but under what theory of law is Dump claiming the DA’s relationship with her lead attorney diminishes or interferes with his defense? Seems like he has everybody in the bushes sniffing for rotting fish.
 
Our military is so much better than everyone else's. No. They can't win. They could just destroy the entire planet including themselves, but no one is beating us in a war. Not gonna happen.

We sent our leftovers to a undermanned military that is pushing Russia out of their country. But somehow Russia is saving something for the US? People can so easily be talked into being dumb.
 
Cause Black Women are not allowed to be in power...

Better question...why are so many in the media going along with it? If Fanni was "Freddy" none of this matters yet you would think she was banging one of the witnesses the way they carry on about it.

then again they did the same thing to Kamala when people started gossiping about her so yeah.
 
Cause Black Women are not allowed to be in power...

Better question...why are so many in the media going along with it? If Fanni was "Freddy" none of this matters yet you would think she was banging one of the witnesses the way they carry on about it.

then again they did the same thing to Kamala when people started gossiping about her so yeah.

If there is no theory of law that supports this shytshow, then you are certainly right about the media. But this is happening in a court of law; what is the prosecution arguing?

Maybe uno will get permission for is to consult directly with his wife.
 
I think their legal contention is that Fani was only able to hire Nathan Wade because of their relationship, so it’s not fair that the Trump defense has to go up against such an experienced and competent prosecutor. Waaaaah!!!!!
 
I think their legal contention is that Fani was only able to hire Nathan Wade because of their relationship, so it’s not fair that the Trump defense has to go up against such an experienced and competent prosecutor. Waaaaah!!!!!

As if the best would not be lining up for the job if it becomes available.

btw: Are they actually stating that position? The current dispute must be in response to the Defendants' motion, and that is public and has probably been picked apart by everybody, including Willis' team. Has the Court pressured for a specific basis?
 
Last edited:
The Court allowed for a massive fishing expedition (they called her Dad I believe) and when I watched her testimony I honestly am not sure what they are arguing. I'm not being vague either like outside of them trying to show some form of impropriety because she had a relationship I cannot tell what the point was.

I think part of it was about money but they never really connected any dots. Like one line of questioning was whether the guy paid for their dinner...like maybe he was trying to bribe his way onto the team or something. But no one in the courtroom seemed to understand what was going on.

The judge seemed to let it ho so when nothing comes of it they have zero basis for appeal. Either that or they are a moron.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top