What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.65: I'm Just Here For The Lincoln Project Ads

Status
Not open for further replies.
cb100723dAPR-800x0.jpg
 
gee Chuck,
this august mookie flew back and visited Pittsburgh Milwaukee Boston Omaha and Tampa.
walked around all. Safe.
ate at full restaurants. Economy seemed ok.
saw people working and heard Spanish. They come to work cause white folk wont take those pittance positions.

is it bad in North Massachusetts???

Chuck Murray said:
cb100723dAPR-800x0.jpg
Click to expand...
 
mookie1995 said:
is it bad in North Massachusetts???
Click to expand...

Way safer up here than down there, mookie. I still gotta visit Boston once or twice a week for work, it's fallen off badly over the last three years I'm glad to be right where we are. Downtown Boston is dead as a doornail.
 
mookie1995 said:
gee Chuck,
this august mookie flew back and visited Pittsburgh Milwaukee Boston Omaha and Tampa.
walked around all. Safe.
ate at full restaurants. Economy seemed ok.
saw people working and heard Spanish. They come to work cause white folk wont take those pittance positions.

is it bad in North Massachusetts???
Click to expand...

Not quite as pure white as it used to be.
 
Brilliant strategist: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/10/trump-election-probe-witnesses-00120748

About 25 witnesses in Donald Trump’s Washington, D.C., criminal case — including a family member of the former president — withheld information from special counsel Jack Smith’s team by citing attorney-client privilege, the special counsel revealed Tuesday.

In a 14-page filing, Smith’s team indicated that those witnesses described maintaining legal confidences with Trump or his campaign that barred them from sharing certain testimony or documents related to the investigation of Trump’s effort to subvert the 2020 election.


But Smith’s team says Trump himself may end up invalidating many of those claims if he chooses to argue during trial that his actions in 2020 were based on the advice of his lawyers. If he does, prosecutors say, they have a right to probe any privileged communications related to that defense.

As a result, Smith is urging U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan to require Trump to disclose his intention to raise the so-called “advice-of-counsel” defense by Dec. 18, far enough in advance of trial for prosecutors to mount any additional investigation.
Click to expand...
 
EL-OH-EL: Trump, and his lawyers, just submitted as a defense, to the 14th Ammendment and election disqualification in Colorado, this statement:

“Section Three does not apply to President Trump,” the filing reads. “Section Three disqualifies a person from holding office only if he “previously [took] an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State…’ Because President Trump was never a congressman, state legislator, or state officer, Section Three applies only if he was an ‘officer of the United States.’ But as that term was used in Section Three, it did not cover the President.”
Click to expand...

Basically, it says that the oath he took on January 20th, 2017, where he verbatim repeated back:
that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Click to expand...
Was horsesh*t and he didnt mean it nor does it mean he needed to adhere to it.
 
aparch said:
EL-OH-EL: Trump, and his lawyers, just submitted as a defense, to the 14th Ammendment and election disqualification in Colorado, this statement:



Basically, it says that the oath he took on January 20th, 2017, where he verbatim repeated back:
Was horsesh*t and he didnt mean it nor does it mean he needed to adhere to it.
Click to expand...

I mean...it is creative at least. Has about as good of a chance of working as I do of winning the Powerball but I still bought a ticket ;^)
 
Umm...

Later on Wednesday, Trump, theclear polling leader in the Republican presidential race,complimented the intelligence of Hezbollah, which has been designated a terrorist organization by the United States. The Iran-aligned group, based in Lebanon, exchanged fire with Israeli forces on the country’s northern border Wednesday.

“You know, Hezbollah is very smart,” Trump said. “They’re all very smart.”
Click to expand...

Beyond the fact that he spit in the face of an ally...he cant even get the terrorist org right! But somehow Biden is the senile one...
 
Handyman said:
I mean...it is creative at least. Has about as good of a chance of working as I do of winning the Powerball but I still bought a ticket ;^)
Click to expand...
“Yes, yes, yes, of course I engaged in insurrection against the US. But it’s a-okay, because I never took an oath as a officer of the US.”


That’s really the best his lawyers could come up with?
 
LynahFan said:
“Yes, yes, yes, of course I engaged in insurrection against the US. But it’s a-okay, because I never took an oath as a officer of the US.”


That’s really the best his lawyers could come up with?
Click to expand...

Well he has publicly destroyed the rest of their arguments so...yes? Same issue in the documents case!

I mean it is either this orthe shouldn't be charged because he was too stupid to pull it off".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top