What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.60: He's Such A Delicate Boy and a Hysterical Man

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.60: He's Such A Delicate Boy and a Hysterical Man

Cleetus: "But he's a blue-collar billionaire who cares about meeeeeeeeee!"

I'll have you know the guys racking up millions each year in golf outings and overpriced hotel/resort bookings does not take a $400K salary!
 
So, the whistleblower is irrelevant. That's why Rand Paul the Libertarian wants him/her exposed and destroyed in the public square. ****ing hypocrite.
The whistleblower has been irrelevant since the first testimony from Volker. Everything everyone has said only confirms what the whistleblower initially went to Congress about. And fleshes out the details.
 
Re: POTUS 45.60: He's Such A Delicate Boy and a Hysterical Man

Yeah. Not to mention Vindman was on the call and confirmed everything the whistleblower said.
 
Re: POTUS 45.60: He's Such A Delicate Boy and a Hysterical Man

The whistleblower has been irrelevant since the first testimony from Volker. Everything everyone has said only confirms what the whistleblower initially went to Congress about. And fleshes out the details.

We have to remind everyone as much as they remind everyone. That's how they win.
 
Re: POTUS 45.60: He's Such A Delicate Boy and a Hysterical Man

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">House GOP eyes committee shake-up ahead of Trump impeachment hearings <a href="https://t.co/47lmWeUHjZ">https://t.co/47lmWeUHjZ</a></p>— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) <a href="https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1191817131022864384?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 5, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Yeah I would want the guy who ignored a bunch of college students being molested taking up my defense as well...
 
Re: POTUS 45.60: He's Such A Delicate Boy and a Hysterical Man

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Dem lawmaker trolls White House press secretary after Trump appointee says there was quid pro quo <a href="https://t.co/gypgNdvD8L">https://t.co/gypgNdvD8L</a> <a href="https://t.co/TtELCynoSF">pic.twitter.com/TtELCynoSF</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1191816721407066119?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 5, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.60: He's Such A Delicate Boy and a Hysterical Man

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">House GOP eyes committee shake-up ahead of Trump impeachment hearings <a href="https://t.co/47lmWeUHjZ">https://t.co/47lmWeUHjZ</a></p>— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) <a href="https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1191817131022864384?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 5, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Yeah I would want the guy who ignored a bunch of college students being molested taking up my defense as well...

Kinda fitting, in a way...
 
Re: POTUS 45.60: He's Such A Delicate Boy and a Hysterical Man

Serious question, why doesn't anyone bring that up in hearings? Is it against House rules?
 
Re: POTUS 45.60: He's Such A Delicate Boy and a Hysterical Man

Yes or at least it used to be. I would still do it though ;)
 
Re: POTUS 45.60: He's Such A Delicate Boy and a Hysterical Man

Yes or at least it used to be. I would still do it though ;)

I'm sure we have some clever wordsmiths in Congress who can refer to it creatively without actually mentioning it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top