What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.59: It Was a Great Phone Call

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.59: It Was a Great Phone Call

Apparently the Times is saying a second whistle-blower is considering coming forward...
 
Re: POTUS 45.59: It Was a Great Phone Call

Scooby is going to love this

Immigrants who can’t prove they don’t have health coverage will be denied visas
 
Re: POTUS 45.59: It Was a Great Phone Call

WASHINGTON — The Agriculture Department moved again this week to cut spending on food stamps, this time proposing changes that would slice $4.5 billion from the program over five years, trimming monthly benefits by as much as $75 for one in five struggling families on nutrition assistance.

The latest plan would cut benefits for 19 percent of households on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly called food stamps, while increasing benefits for 16 percent. Almost 8,000 households would lose benefits entirely. Those cuts would be concentrated in cold northern states that would be most affected by a change in the way heating costs are calculated.
Click to expand...

Sure, Amazon doesn't pay any taxes, but the real problem is Bob getting almost $200/month in food stamps to feed his kids.
 
Re: POTUS 45.59: It Was a Great Phone Call

ticapnews said:
Sure, Amazon doesn't pay any taxes, but the real problem is Bob getting almost $200/month in food stamps to feed his kids.
Click to expand...

More pandering to red states. f**k these f*****g f***s.

Oh and princess can you snowflakes go easy on the filters?
 
Re: POTUS 45.59: It Was a Great Phone Call

Sondland to give deposition.

These state department guys could have hidden behind Pompeo's not gonna cooperate statement. But they're fleeing this sinking ship like rats.
 
Re: POTUS 45.59: It Was a Great Phone Call

So, given Trump and Giuliani's obsession with the debunked Crowdstrike theory on the DNC email hack, does this mean they've given up on claiming the late Seth Rich did it?
 
Rogie21 said:
So, given Trump and Giuliani's obsession with the debunked Crowdstrike theory on the DNC email hack, does this mean they've given up on claiming the late Seth Rich did it?
Click to expand...
No, the Crowdstrike thing ties in to the Seth Rich conspiracy. According to Trump and Rudy, Crowdstrike gave the FBI faked data blaming the Russians for the DNC hack, when it was really Seth Rich.

That this is totally false means nothing to Trump and Rudy. They'll just keep talking about it til half the country thinks its true, just like with the Biden stuff. They don't care about truth or facts, they just want to obscure everything in a cloudy, murky, both-sides fog.
 
Re: POTUS 45.59: It Was a Great Phone Call

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mitt Romney never knew how to win. He is a pompous “ass” who has been fighting me from the beginning, except when he begged me for my endorsement for his Senate run (I gave it to him), and when he begged me to be Secretary of State (I didn’t give it to him). He is so bad for R’s!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1180487139546546182?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.59: It Was a Great Phone Call

That "Make Trump Tweets Eight Again" app really does make his tweets more enjoyable.
 
Re: POTUS 45.59: It Was a Great Phone Call

Love Jeff

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">it's true that billionaire vulture capitalist Mitt Romney never went broke running casinos. is that the kind of winning you're referring to</p>— Jeff Tiedrich (@itsJeffTiedrich) <a href="https://twitter.com/itsJeffTiedrich/status/1180487692401950720?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.59: It Was a Great Phone Call

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Pres. Trump: "I was investigated. I was investigated. Okay? Me. Me. In my campaign. I ran. I won. I was invest—you won’t say that, will you? I was investigated. I was investigated... I was investigated by the Obama administration. By the Obama administration I was investigated." <a href="https://t.co/ihqZwjGNaE">pic.twitter.com/ihqZwjGNaE</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1180486548782866432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He is like a 5 year old who learned a new word...
 
Re: POTUS 45.59: It Was a Great Phone Call

The Rube said:
You CAN compliment a woman on her looks, but be gentlemanly about it.
Click to expand...

Not at work you can't and you shouldn't. It's injecting something into the interaction with a coworker that is potentially unwanted.

Bringing up looks is, and this might be the only time I ever use this terminology, a microaggression. It shifts the context of the interaction from work to personal without consent. That's what in the Old Days we called taking a liberty. Now, in the Old Days taking a liberty was grabbing her as-s, but bringing up looks is of the same quality though different in quantity.

If a woman wants you to be interested in her personally she will let you know. No man in world history has ever made the first move successfully.
 
Kepler said:
Not at work you can't and you shouldn't. It's injecting something into the interaction with a coworker that is potentially unwanted.

Bringing up looks is, and this might be the only time I ever use this terminology, a microaggression. It shifts the context of the interaction from work to personal without consent. That's what in the Old Days we called taking a liberty. Now, in the Old Days taking a liberty was grabbing her as-s, but bringing up looks is of the same quality though different in quantity.

If a woman wants you to be interested in her personally she will let you know. No man in world history has ever made the first move successfully.
Click to expand...

Well now....

Did Jesus come onto Mary Magdalene first, or did Mary Magdalene bat an eyelash?
 
Re: POTUS 45.59: It Was a Great Phone Call

Trump cutting numbers at the National Security Council. Fewer members, fewer people with access to sensitive information(his crimes), fewer leakers and whistleblowers
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top