What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Who is this moron? Authoritarian can’t be indicted so why bother investigation?
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

The Water Carrying is entering epic levels.

This is why this is an epic waste of time. Who here cannot predict how it is going to go? I am not listening but can anyone tell me, has Mueller revealed anything at all that was not in his report? Has a single democrat pushed him to do what the American people deserve? Has a single republican asked him a question that wasn't designed to pull out individual, out of context notions that "defend" trump? I'm willing to bet it will be more predictable than an episode of a bad, formulaic situation comedy. Cue dad jokes, or exasperated wives, or goofy next door neighbors.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

This is why this is an epic waste of time. Who here cannot predict how it is going to go? I am not listening but can anyone tell me, has Mueller revealed anything at all that was not in his report? Has a single democrat pushed him to do what the American people deserve? Has a single republican asked him a question that wasn't designed to pull out individual, out of context notions that "defend" trump? I'm willing to bet it will be more predictable than an episode of a bad, formulaic situation comedy. Cue dad jokes, or exasperated wives, or goofy next door neighbors.

Pretty much. Still gotta do it, though. The President of the United States is a traitor. Obviously his zombies will never realize it but we do actually have to try to get it on record in the present. Whenever we let these monsters slide (Iran Contra, Iraq lies) they come back ten times stronger. When we actually hold their feet to the fire for a bit, well, no, we don't get anywhere with the hypnotized, but other people are repelled enough that they get off their couch. For a bit.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Jim Jordan is the stupid kid who thinks he sounds ridiculously smart and has that stupid "I'm a smart guy!" grin on his face every time he talks.

He's not smart.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Pretty much. Still gotta do it, though. The President of the United States is a traitor. Obviously his zombies will never realize it but we do actually have to try to get it on record in the present. Whenever we let these monsters slide (Iran Contra, Iraq lies) they come back ten times stronger. When we actually hold their feet to the fire for a bit, well, no, we don't get anywhere with the hypnotized, but other people are repelled enough that they get off their couch. For a bit.

Isn't it already on the record? Americans are lazy, and these things have just as much of an opportunity to blow up in the face of the right side as they do to convince more people of the wrongdoings of the wrong side. I don't believe a single person will be repelled more than they already are. None of us will hear anything that lessens our disdain for this president and we already know trump has committed crimes and impeachable offenses. No republican is going to come into the light because of this. So why do it? I see no reason. The Watergate hearings and reporting actually changed people's minds because we were different 45 years ago. Since we all know trump could drop his drawers and crap on an American flag and his rubes and dupes would eat it up (wouldn't that be fun to watch) why do this? Like I said, it's already on record, Mueller already went as far as he will go, back in May when he closed down his office to say trump is not exonerated.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Jim Jordan is the stupid kid who thinks he sounds ridiculously smart and has that stupid "I'm a smart guy!" grin on his face every time he talks.

He's not smart.

He's spectacularly stupid.

He graduated from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1986, obtaining his bachelor's degree in economics.

Jordan was a two-time NCAA Division I wrestling champion. In the 1985 NCAA championship match, Jordan Lost to future two-time Olympic gold medalist and four-time world champion John Smith. Jordan worked as an assistant wrestling coach at the Ohio State University from 1986 to 1994.

Yeah, that's where I want to find my House Members.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

I was half listening while driving in traffic. I'd summarize this as:

After one period of play, we're tied at 2-2 after the Dems gave up two quick goals very early in the game due to bad defense and poor communication. Pulled it together to even it up in the second half of that period.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

He's spectacularly stupid.



Yeah, that's where I want to find my House Members.

why doesn't someone look at him now and quickly ask "why did you let kids get raped?"
or better yet, ask mueller, "can you speak to the fact that jimbo there let kids get raped?" mueller can reply "i can't speak to that", and we move to the next question.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

why doesn't someone look at him now and quickly ask "why did you let kids get raped?"
or better yet, ask mueller, "can you speak to the fact that jimbo there let kids get raped?" mueller can reply "i can't speak to that", and we move to the next question.

I have wondered the same thing. WOrth the censure.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Epic <a href="https://twitter.com/Reuters?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Reuters</a> photo by <a href="https://twitter.com/j_ernst_DC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@j_ernst_DC</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Muellerhearing?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Muellerhearing</a> <a href="https://t.co/PHC3MhtzWE">pic.twitter.com/PHC3MhtzWE</a></p>— Sarah Burris (@SarahBurris) <a href="https://twitter.com/SarahBurris/status/1154030116344872960?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 24, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This really is an epic photo
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Best gloss of the proceeedings, courtesy of a Kos post:

Wife: Did you take out the garbage like I asked?

Me: I refer you back to the report.

Wife: Just answer the question.

Me: Again, please see the relevant passage in the report.

Wife: Did you or didn't you?

Me: I'm sorry I cannot go outside the four corners of my report.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

I gave up. What'd he do that was different/effective?

Essentially went through the three requirements for obstruction and got mueller agreed to the first two and I didn't see the third.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

when these dudes keep repeating themselves, it's time to end.

everyone wants their face time :)
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

The Democrats looks incredibly well-prepared. They've coordinated their efforts and have divided their time up to question Mueller on a specific portion of that effort. It's well-cited and carefully delivered. Not sure it's enough, but they're laying the foundation for impeachment. *crosses fingers*
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Oh Donnie

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“Mueller was asked whether or not the investigation was impeded in any way, and he said no.” In other words, there was NO OBSTRUCTION. <a href="https://twitter.com/KatiePavlich?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@KatiePavlich</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/FoxNews?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@FoxNews</a></p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1154041338653892608?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 24, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

The Democrats looks incredibly well-prepared. They've coordinated their efforts and have divided their time up to question Mueller on a specific portion of that effort. It's well-cited and carefully delivered. Not sure it's enough, but they're laying the foundation for impeachment. *crosses fingers*

I'd suggest uncrossing them. You'll cut off circulation long enough waiting for something good to happen and get gangrene or something. It ain't gonna happen. And if it does, kiss the 2020 elections, and our democracy, goodbye.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top