D
Deleted member 3166
Guest
It is a problem...but it is "their" problem. That's how people think.
People care about issues when it affects them.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
- Thread starter ScoobyDoo
- Start date
- Status
It is a problem...but it is "their" problem. That's how people think.
People care about issues when it affects them.
rufus
rock and roller
And I'll say to you, this ain't the previous century anymore. Hell, this ain't the 2000's anymore. Things change, issues are different. Need different solutions, different ways of thinking.
As your broker would say, past results are not indicative of the future.
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
Then F off. You're useless if you create your own reality and then mope around all day when it doesn't come true. I keep asking you/trix/rufus/etc to name me the last progressive President that you approve of, and none of you can name one. If you're on that long of a losing streak, why should any voter trust you to create a winning message next year? Geesh - point me to some successes on your part. Is that so hard???
So basically you're saying you'd go to a job interview and state that you've failed at everything you've tried to achieve for as long as you can remember, but past results don't matter so you can trust me to succeed this time. Do you think that'd work?
Then F off. You're useless if you create your own reality and then mope around all day when it doesn't come true. I keep asking you/trix/rufus/etc to name me the last progressive President that you approve of, and none of you can name one. If you're on that long of a losing streak, why should any voter trust you to create a winning message next year? Geesh - point me to some successes on your part. Is that so hard???
So basically you're saying you'd go to a job interview and state that you've failed at everything you've tried to achieve for as long as you can remember, but past results don't matter so you can trust me to succeed this time. Do you think that'd work?
ScoobyDoo
NPC
trixR4kids
Well-known member
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
And lol at the dis-ingenuousness of the question, the boomer generation had completely warped priorities that have led us where we are today. Of course there weren't many progressive presidents (after FDR) before I could even vote lmfao.
"3rd way reforms worked in the 90's and so they'll work forever", I tell myself as I'm taken to Guantanamo.
And lol at the dis-ingenuousness of the question, the boomer generation had completely warped priorities that have led us where we are today. Of course there weren't many progressive presidents (after FDR) before I could even vote lmfao.
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
Okay, so you guys will only be on a 76 year losing streak (wait, does his 1944 re-election count or was he a conservative by then?) come 2020.
Okay, so you guys will only be on a 76 year losing streak (wait, does his 1944 re-election count or was he a conservative by then?) come 2020.
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
Wouldn't THAT be nice! (for the rest of us anyway)
Name me one, in the trix approved mold. We all agree on FDR and the whininess of boomers. Now show me all of the trix approved progressives who've won for President or even in a swing state for Gov or Senate (hint: AOC doesn't represent a swing district
).
Wouldn't THAT be nice! (for the rest of us anyway)
Name me one, in the trix approved mold. We all agree on FDR and the whininess of boomers. Now show me all of the trix approved progressives who've won for President or even in a swing state for Gov or Senate (hint: AOC doesn't represent a swing district
).
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
That's easy. Sherrod Brown.
Name me one, in the trix approved mold. We all agree on FDR and the whininess of boomers. Now show me all of the trix approved progressives who've won for President or even in a swing state for Gov or Senate (hint: AOC doesn't represent a swing district
That's easy. Sherrod Brown.
trixR4kids
Well-known member
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
Well if I set up the parameters exactly in this way and shift the goal posts here then I win! - Rover
edit: Kara Eastman lost by like 1% in Nebraska but that doesn't count despite the fact that she got zero help from the dem party (that totally cares about winning
). Abrams lost in GA by a few thousand votes after the incumbent oversaw his own election. AOC took out Joe ****ing Crowley lmao, but that doesn't count because the goal posts are here now.
Well if I set up the parameters exactly in this way and shift the goal posts here then I win! - Rover
edit: Kara Eastman lost by like 1% in Nebraska but that doesn't count despite the fact that she got zero help from the dem party (that totally cares about winning
). Abrams lost in GA by a few thousand votes after the incumbent oversaw his own election. AOC took out Joe ****ing Crowley lmao, but that doesn't count because the goal posts are here now.
Last edited:
rufus
rock and roller
Maybe Hillary should run again.Then F off. You're useless if you create your own reality and then mope around all day when it doesn't come true. I keep asking you/trix/rufus/etc to name me the last progressive President that you approve of, and none of you can name one. If you're on that long of a losing streak, why should any voter trust you to create a winning message next year? Geesh - point me to some successes on your part. Is that so hard???
So basically you're saying you'd go to a job interview and state that you've failed at everything you've tried to achieve for as long as you can remember, but past results don't matter so you can trust me to succeed this time. Do you think that'd work?
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
I'll bring this home for you. If democratic socialism is the new thing that's cool. But, before I enlist I'd like to see what kind of generals are running the war effort. Right now your track record is that of the French commanding troops to climb barbed wire and cross an open field to charge a machine gun nest during WWI. Why don't you bank a few victories first to build a bit more confidence with the poor slobs in the trenches?
EDIT: So AOC represents a swing district? Talk about moving the goalposts. I think you just blew them up with dynamite.
I'll bring this home for you. If democratic socialism is the new thing that's cool. But, before I enlist I'd like to see what kind of generals are running the war effort. Right now your track record is that of the French commanding troops to climb barbed wire and cross an open field to charge a machine gun nest during WWI. Why don't you bank a few victories first to build a bit more confidence with the poor slobs in the trenches?
EDIT: So AOC represents a swing district? Talk about moving the goalposts. I think you just blew them up with dynamite.
Last edited:
D
Deutsche Gopher Fan
Guest
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
What’s going on here? Maybe I’ll stick to abortion thread for awhile!
What’s going on here? Maybe I’ll stick to abortion thread for awhile!
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
Hey, that raging conservative Barack Obama won twice!
Hey, that raging conservative Barack Obama won twice!
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
More small c conservative then W or Dump. By a wide margin.
More small c conservative then W or Dump. By a wide margin.
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
You comin' on to me?
You comin' on to me?
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
So you think trashing Barack Obama's Presidency is the way to win the Democratic nomination. Okay....
Ain't nobody coming onto you Kep. Although if you dressed like Karl Marx you might have half a shot with rufus...
So you think trashing Barack Obama's Presidency is the way to win the Democratic nomination. Okay....
Ain't nobody coming onto you Kep. Although if you dressed like Karl Marx you might have half a shot with rufus...
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
has rover been innerviewing applicants in their 20s and low 30s down post office sq?!?!?!
So basically you're saying you'd go to a job interview and state that you've failed at everything you've tried to achieve for as long as you can remember, but past results don't matter so you can trust me to succeed this time. Do you think that'd work?
has rover been innerviewing applicants in their 20s and low 30s down post office sq?!?!?!
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
How is that trashing it? Being small c conservative is not a negative. In anything.
How is that trashing it? Being small c conservative is not a negative. In anything.
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
Worse, I've been mentoring students and recent grads! I'm creating a whole army of people in my own image. BWAAA HAA HAAA HAAA!
has rover been innerviewing applicants in their 20s and low 30s down post office sq?!?!?!
Worse, I've been mentoring students and recent grads! I'm creating a whole army of people in my own image. BWAAA HAA HAAA HAAA!
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
The history of liberalism is: to be regarded with horror until our programs work after which the tepid centrists rush in to take belated credit. You'll love Single Payer someday after trying to fight us tooth and nail on it.
We win by dragging you cowards to the left far enough that people vote for us. When you resist successfully you wind up running a flaccid centrist and people HATE them and they lose. Bill Clinton was your one great success since the 1920s -- somebody right of center of the Democratic movement who won because of his charisma. The other successful Democratic presidents: FDR, Kennedy, Obama, were ours and ran on giving people aspirations rather than the same old stale porridge. Another conservdem, Carter, lucked into a cycle of pure anti-GOP hatred but immediately dropped the ball and ushered in Reagan's Armageddon.
We win the elections and you take the credit. Twas ever thus.
The history of liberalism is: to be regarded with horror until our programs work after which the tepid centrists rush in to take belated credit. You'll love Single Payer someday after trying to fight us tooth and nail on it.
We win by dragging you cowards to the left far enough that people vote for us. When you resist successfully you wind up running a flaccid centrist and people HATE them and they lose. Bill Clinton was your one great success since the 1920s -- somebody right of center of the Democratic movement who won because of his charisma. The other successful Democratic presidents: FDR, Kennedy, Obama, were ours and ran on giving people aspirations rather than the same old stale porridge. Another conservdem, Carter, lucked into a cycle of pure anti-GOP hatred but immediately dropped the ball and ushered in Reagan's Armageddon.
We win the elections and you take the credit. Twas ever thus.
Last edited:
- Status