What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

Handyman said:
Looks like Milo's days at Breitbart are numbered...
Click to expand...

I watched the Maher episode last night. I didn't realize exactly how giant of a pr!!ck Milo is. I've seen the headlines, but he's just the worst of every kind of Millennial stereotype. Nothing about him is particularly interesting nor does he have any interesting and fact-based theories.

How he became big is beyond me.
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

dxmnkd316 said:
If you and your ilk would stop trying to defend Trump by splitting hairs and trying to fudge the data, maybe we wouldn't have to deal with it.
Click to expand...

Defending? No. Examining the claims? Yes. Do they even have an iota of basis or are they pure crapola.

Imagine if Arizona State had won their first ever full member official Division I hockey game.

Until they lost they'd be the "winningest program of all time!" They could claim that title by winning percentage.

College hockey fans would smirk. We'd know better. But others would buy it.

It's spin.

It's today's realpolitik.
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

The Sicatoka said:
Defending? No. Examining the claims? Yes. Do they even have an iota of basis or are they pure crapola.
Click to expand...

Your pedantic approach to defending Trump is still pedantic.

I'd be ok with it if you had the balls to come out and say, "I actually agree with Policy X because of points Y and Z." BUt you're not. You're saying "Well, in volume the 9th has had the most!" as if that is what he meant. It's not. And if it was, it's moronic and you should say as much instead of being a pedant.

As for the rest of the post, it's a faulty syllogism. And I hesitate to use the word 'faulty' because it implies that there is at least a modicum of merit behind it. There is none.
 
dxmnkd316 said:
How he became big is beyond me.
Click to expand...

I only started hearing about him in the last few months. I think he did a big college campus tour where annoying, triggered students showed up to scream at and protest his appearance, and succeeded in having him cancelled a couple times.

Good job giving him free press, idiots.
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

The Sicatoka said:
If someone told you "the 9th is most overturned" would you stop to ask "by volume or percent?"
Click to expand...

Would I be using it for a paper or, bigger yet, a speech that would be viewed by millions? And am I the mother fu#king PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?

The Sicatoka said:
You missed the point of my question, but speculated at what the numbers are not there to determine:

The 9th may not be most overturned by percent, but by shear case volume may be "most overturned".


< comment here about lies, ****ed lies, and statistics >
Click to expand...

So you're an enabler.

Seriously - is there nothing he does you haven't tried to explain away?

Please don't play Bob the Martyr or cry, "What'd I do?" It's unbecoming and you're fooling no one. This isn't about people attacking you simply because they disagree, it's the incessant false equivalencies and deflections people object to.
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

Given Trump's methods of selecting top officials*, it's just luck that we happened to have a smart, competent, diplomatic person named "General McMaster" looking for a post.
*It involves a dartboard, glamour shots, and a game called "rhymes with"
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

French Rage said:
And here's the WH transcript, in case Flaggy believes that a third-party misquoted him: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/02/16/remarks-president-trump-press-conference



And of course it's not even close. 5 of the 7 election winners since Reagan had more than 306, only W did not in both of his elections.
Click to expand...

Wow, talk about analysis by taking the quote out of context. He was very clearly referring to the 1980 election, where Reagan didn't have a chance in hell, and still won. Just like how Trump didn't have a chance in hell, y'all were so cocky and gloating, but guess who now has to eat their own words?
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

FadeToBlack&Gold said:
I only started hearing about him in the last few months. I think he did a big college campus tour where annoying, triggered students showed up to scream at and protest his appearance, and succeeded in having him cancelled a couple times.

Good job giving him free press, idiots.
Click to expand...

Maybe instead of being a bunch of fascists, let him speak, and then if no one shows up, claim what you wish.
 
FlagDUDE08 said:
Wow, talk about analysis by taking the quote out of context. He was very clearly referring to the 1980 election, where Reagan didn't have a chance in hell, and still won. Just like how Trump didn't have a chance in hell, y'all were so cocky and gloating, but guess who now has to eat their own words?
Click to expand...

No he wasn't. Literally no one thinks that watch the video. Even he didn't pretend that is what he was saying.

Your fakeness is showing Frauddy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top