What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

In the Maher interview didn't the phrase "liberals always take the bait" come up?

Yes, and it's NOT true -- some of us have figured out the game, though to be honest it took years of working with hate radio listeners until I personally finally figured it out.

The right lies when it says the left is intolerant. But the left does have problems listening and above all we have problems remembering who our audience is. The conveyor belt response is to drop a poli sci 450 seminar on people, and most people neither are able nor wish to function at that level. They want quick, pithy truthiness, and the right is perfectly positioned to serve it up.

Essentially, the problem is members of the left spent their intellectual formative years in academia and science, where truth is always provisional and modeled. Members of the right spent their intellectual formative years in church or the army, where truth is declarative and proceeds down a chain of command, or in business, where truth is just another illusion used to sell people things.

The other problem is that while righties, when they lose their cool, resort to their fists, lefties when they lose their cool resort to moralistic hissy fits. With righties it doesn't matter all that much, because they live in a (fictional) universe of animal absolutes and force is the ultimate animal absolute. But lefties live in a (knowingly constructed then deconstructed then analyzed ad nauseam) universe of vegetable lifecycles where everything is an organic sociological growth of everything else, so when they go into Sputtering Spurned Teen mode they've given away all their leverage and footing. For conservatives, anger is power. For liberals, it is the mind-killer.

So we lose an argument as soon as it becomes a brawl, and when we shout down some idiot like Milo (or Maher) we create the brawl which we will inevitably lose. The way to "win" is to remain upright, argue using our strengths of logic and knowledge, accept that you will never convince the speaker, but do your best to show the best side of your argument to any passers-by. That is how cultural battles are won.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

Yes, and it's NOT true -- some of us have figured out the game, though to be honest it took years of working with hate radio listeners until I personally finally figured it out.

The right lies when it says the left is intolerant. But the left does have problems listening and above all we have problems remembering who our audience is. The conveyor belt response is to drop a poli sci 450 seminar on people, and most people neither are able nor wish to function at that level. They want quick, pithy truthiness, and the right is perfectly positioned to serve it up.

Essentially, the problem is members of the left spent their intellectual formative years in academia and science, where truth is always provisional and modeled. Members of the right spent their intellectual formative years in church or the army, where truth is declarative and proceeds down a chain of command, or in business, where truth is just another illusion used to sell people things.

The other problem is that while righties, when they lose their cool, resort to their fists, lefties when they lose their cool resort to moralistic hissy fits. With righties it doesn't matter all that much, because they live in a (fictional) universe of animal absolutes and force is the ultimate animal absolute. But lefties live in a (knowingly constructed then deconstructed then analyzed ad nauseam) universe of vegetable lifecycles where everything is an organic sociological growth of everything else, so when they go into Sputtering Spurned Teen mode they've given away all their leverage and footing. For conservatives, anger is power. For liberals, fear in the mind-killer.

So we lose fights that become brawls, and when we shout down some idiot like Milo (or Maher) we start a brawl which we then lose. The way to "win" is to remain upright, argue using our strengths of logic and knowledge, accept that you will never convince the speaker, but do your best to show the best side of your argument to any passers-by. That is how cultural battles are won.

If by fists you mean their guns, and by guns I don't mean their arms, and by arms I don't mean their firearms.
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

If by fists you mean their guns, and by guns I don't mean their arms, and by arms I don't mean their firearms.

I mean when you back a righty into a corner he'll come at you with violence, and when you back a liberal into a corner he'll write an angry letter to The New Yorker and make a bitterly funny tweet. Meanwhile the righty, having made his "point," lumbers off in search of loose shoes, tight p-ssy and a warm place to sh-t.
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

I mean when you back a righty into a corner he'll come at you with violence, and when you back a liberal into a corner he'll write an angry letter to The New Yorker and make a bitterly funny tweet. Meanwhile the righty, having made his "point," lumbers off in search of loose shoes, tight p-ssy and a warm place to sh-t.

In the end though, isn't that what everyone wants? The witty tweet I mean. Clearly.
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

So we lose an argument as soon as it becomes a brawl, and when we shout down some idiot like Milo (or Maher) we create the brawl which we will inevitably lose. The way to "win" is to remain upright, argue using our strengths of logic and knowledge, accept that you will never convince the speaker, but do your best to show the best side of your argument to any passers-by. That is how cultural battles are won.
I can't think of a professional calling I'd less like to have as my chosen career than that of pastor/priest/reverend/rabbi, etc..., but I can't think of another group whose ability to persuade I'd more like to have as my own.

To be able to stand, in the face of disbelievers or even mortal enemies and speak the same message, over and over, with an undying faith that sooner or later it will get through, is something I've long admired. It probably speaks to why MLK was as effective as he was.
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

I can't think of a professional calling I'd less like to have as my chosen career than that of pastor/priest/reverend/rabbi, etc..., but I can't think of another group whose ability to persuade I'd more like to have as my own.

To be able to stand, in the face of disbelievers or even mortal enemies and speak the same message, over and over, with an undying faith that sooner or later it will get through, is something I've long admired. It probably speaks to why MLK was as effective as he was.

Well said.
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

Just heard on MSNBC that the Trump administration is deferring to the House (Ryan) on Health Care and Tax Policy. Anyone confirm? That appears to be more lies cause Trump said he had the awesomest plans ever.
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

Maybe if the Jews had simply not gotten so emotional and ignored the Nazis...:rolleyes:

If you came away from the Bill Maher thing thinking that sending someone a message saying "This is your unlisted address and I'm coming to rape you" is just a joke that liberal snowflakes can't help but "take the bait" on, well....I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say that Bill Maher did a far less sufficient job of shining light on the issue than you believe.
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

I can't think of a professional calling I'd less like to have as my chosen career than that of pastor/priest/reverend/rabbi, etc..., but I can't think of another group whose ability to persuade I'd more like to have as my own.

To be able to stand, in the face of disbelievers or even mortal enemies and speak the same message, over and over, with an undying faith that sooner or later it will get through, is something I've long admired. It probably speaks to why MLK was as effective as he was.

People tend to forget how much opposition he faced from those inside the black community who did not believe change could be accomplished peacefully.

His words:

The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral,
begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy.
Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it.
Through violence you may murder the liar,
but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth.
Through violence you may murder the hater,
but you do not murder hate.
In fact, violence merely increases hate.
So it goes.
Returning violence for violence multiplies violence,
adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars.
Darkness cannot drive out darkness:
only light can do that.
Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

I don't believe Maher changed at all. His whole shtick for decades has been "give em enough rope." Maher's whole philosophy is let the jackas-ses self-identify, because condemning them and censoring them just turns them into martyrs.

Milo's gig is to roll into town and get you to victimize him. If you just let him say his stoopid piece and then tear him apart on content, he loses.

The Whole Point is Milo has no power other than what we liberals gave him. The way to defeat judo is to just step aside.

Bingo!
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

"I like Jews who weren't captured and killed, OK?"

I laughed...because I totally saw him saying that!

"Anne Frank...I read her book. Honestly, it was terrible. My book was a New York Times bestseller! It is one of the best selling books in the history of the industry! In fact, I believe I read it sold more books than even the Bible! I dont know if it is true but I read it! Do you think Hillary Clinton's book could do that...WRONG! Anne Frank is a little girl and her foundation is worthless. The Donald Trump Foundation gives BILLIONS in aide to people all over the world! They are the heroes, they were killed in a war because they lived in an Attic!!"

BTW Maize has definitely gone full Foxton...
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

I laughed...because I totally saw him saying that!

"Anne Frank...I read her book. Honestly, it was terrible. My book was a New York Times bestseller! It is one of the best selling books in the history of the industry! In fact, I believe I read it sold more books than even the Bible! I dont know if it is true but I read it! Do you think Hillary Clinton's book could do that...WRONG! Anne Frank is a little girl and her foundation is worthless. The Donald Trump Foundation gives BILLIONS in aide to people all over the world! They are the heroes, they were killed in a war because they lived in an Attic!!"

BTW Maize has definitely gone full Foxton...

"Which, by the way, is not as good as my attic. My attic is tremendous."
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack

Just heard on MSNBC that the Trump administration is deferring to the House (Ryan) on Health Care and Tax Policy. Anyone confirm? That appears to be more lies cause Trump said he had the awesomest plans ever.

Its truly stunning the number of proposed election policies Trump has gone back on in his one month in office.
 
Re: POTUS 45.5 - Sweden is Under Attack


Yes, CNN giving Trump unlimited airtime certainly didn't normalize his rhetoric at all and really tanked his campaign. What a tremendous strategy that is.

If Maher really "exposed" this guy, why do I have to argue with a thread full of valid opinion havers that think explicit threats to rape and murder women is just saying mean stuff to bait liberals? Believe it or not, the guy maybe downplayed some of the less savory aspects of what his people do. Maher could have had on one of the dozens of victims he's harassed on the show instead of, or at least in addition to, Milo to present a more accurate picture. Instead, a credulous audience walked away saying "Yeah....why shouldn't the will be able to triumph?"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top