What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45:47: I Never Said There Was No Collusion!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45:47: I Never Said There Was No Collusion!

Here is a question for you and others here. If a deal could be brokered that ended the shutdown, did not call for any wall funding, but somehow allowed Trump to "save face," would you be in favor of it? I suspect for some of you here the answer is "no."

I have no problem allowing Trump to save face if the terms are acceptable. He'll shame himself tomorrow anyway.
 
Re: POTUS 45:47: I Never Said There Was No Collusion!

I wouldn't have a problem at all. They offered like $5 billion on everything but a wall. Drones, judges, manpower, etc. Problem is that he's tied himself to the mast on the wall so he *can't* save face.
 
Re: POTUS 45:47: I Never Said There Was No Collusion!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">FBI arrested my neighbor Roger before my morning jog, I’ve only seen **** like that in movies, crazy to start to my Friday</p>— Chad Johnson (@ochocinco) <a href="https://twitter.com/ochocinco/status/1088791420511678466?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 25, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45:47: I Never Said There Was No Collusion!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">FBI arrested my neighbor Roger before my morning jog, I’ve only seen **** like that in movies, crazy to start to my Friday</p>— Chad Johnson (@ochocinco) <a href="https://twitter.com/ochocinco/status/1088791420511678466?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 25, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Lmao
 
Re: POTUS 45:47: I Never Said There Was No Collusion!

Here is a question for you and others here. If a deal could be brokered that ended the shutdown, did not call for any wall funding, but somehow allowed Trump to "save face," would you be in favor of it? I suspect for some of you here the answer is "no."

I would not be happy to let the moron save face. But I know Congress is working on that.

Still, based on his tantrums, the only thing that will save face would be money for the wall. Not money for real border protection, but for a wall.

BTW, DW is a federal worker. So we are directly impacted by this BS. So I actually have skin in the game.
 
Re: POTUS 45:47: I Never Said There Was No Collusion!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">FBI arrested my neighbor Roger before my morning jog, I’ve only seen **** like that in movies, crazy to start to my Friday</p>— Chad Johnson (@ochocinco) <a href="https://twitter.com/ochocinco/status/1088791420511678466?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 25, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Ironic that we have a dictator running the country, and one of his best buds got picked up using known strong arm tactics.

Well, they could have showed up a lot earlier.
 
I have no problem allowing Trump to save face if the terms are acceptable. He'll shame himself tomorrow anyway.

Same. Just no wall funding. Has to make sense where it goes
 
Re: POTUS 45:47: I Never Said There Was No Collusion!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sanders downplays Stone's arrest: "This has nothing to do w/the president & certainly nothing to do with the White House. This is something that has to do solely w/that individual, not something that affects us in this building... will the same standard apply to Hillary Clinton?" <a href="https://t.co/sRjHYZdr5k">pic.twitter.com/sRjHYZdr5k</a></p>— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) <a href="https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1088796585096564737?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 25, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45:47: I Never Said There Was No Collusion!

I would not be happy to let the moron save face. But I know Congress is working on that.

Still, based on his tantrums, the only thing that will save face would be money for the wall. Not money for real border protection, but for a wall.

BTW, DW is a federal worker. So we are directly impacted by this BS. So I actually have skin in the game.

Well, I'm sorry you're stuck in the middle of it. That sucks.

But there has to be a way of ending it through negotiation without the wall funding. Hopefully behind the scenes someone is working on it, but I don't get the sense of that.
 
Re: POTUS 45:47: I Never Said There Was No Collusion!

Of course not. But what is the alternative? We can "teach" him that this is not an acceptable method by refusing to negotiate. I have no objection to that, on a personal level, but then again I'm not a federal worker. It just seems to me to be a bit cruel to tell the federal workers that we're not going to negotiate with the madman because we need to teach him a lesson.

Dr. Mrs. is a federal worker, and she's furloughed. This is hurting us. We are both 100% certain that we can't give in to this toddler. We have to set the precedent that this tactic does not work or it will simply become part of the Dump, and then the Republican, playbook.

The cops don't tell the bank robber, "give back half the money and we'll let you go."
 
Re: POTUS 45:47: I Never Said There Was No Collusion!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sanders downplays Stone's arrest: "This has nothing to do w/the president & certainly nothing to do with the White House. This is something that has to do solely w/that individual, not something that affects us in this building... will the same standard apply to Hillary Clinton?" <a href="https://t.co/sRjHYZdr5k">pic.twitter.com/sRjHYZdr5k</a></p>— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) <a href="https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1088796585096564737?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 25, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Would someone lock that ****ing ***** up?
 
Re: POTUS 45:47: I Never Said There Was No Collusion!

Something's gonna happen. ATCs are working 10-hour shifts unpaid and then going to a second job. Eventually somebody's going to roll quadruple sixes.
 
Re: POTUS 45:47: I Never Said There Was No Collusion!

Folks can take Amtrak to nyc. That’s a viable well run option.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top