What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

1. We aren't talking about CEOs or any private citizen. Unlike CEOs, those in the white house 'love!' this country.
2. Loopholes that are somewhere in the realm of average...is very different than absolutely zero taxes.

I'm just saying that this isn't a party issue. It's an American issue. That's all.
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

I'm just saying that this isn't a party issue. It's an American issue. That's all.

Take your centrist **** out of here. This is the Ayn Rand plan. This is Ryan, Reagan, and ALL THE REST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

I'm just saying that this isn't a party issue. It's an American issue. That's all.

And what I'm saying is that Democrats are more likely to play the rules within reason (drive 60 in a 55) and the Republicans don't (drive 100 in a 55 while being drunk).

The GOP literally tries to break the rules every single way they can. Gerrymandering, voter restrictions, 100% negative campaigning, positioning all 'liberals' as the enemy of the people, criticize taxing while they borrow and spend (which is both worse for the country and unethically deceptive). Paying zero taxes is just a symptom along with an infinite number of other symptoms of steal what you can.

No 'it' is not just an American issue.
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

1. We aren't talking about CEOs or any private citizen. Unlike CEOs, those in the white house 'love!' this country..

the time periods in question... what was kushner again? (besides a jew.. or is that was gets you mad? :( )
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

I'm just saying that this isn't a party issue. It's an American issue. That's all.

No, it's a government issue. Without government doing the bidding of the oligarchs and enabling this, it wouldn't be happening. You want it changed, change your government.
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

No, it's a government issue. Without government doing the bidding of the oligarchs and enabling this, it wouldn't be happening. You want it changed, change your government.

Fine, it's a government issue. Either way, all businesses take advantage of all the loopholes in the laws, and the lobbies that are present have enough power to make Rs AND Ds to not close said loopholes. The Rs are more guilty, and the Ds less guilty, but guilty is still guilty. Period.
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Fine, it's a government issue. Either way, all businesses take advantage of all the loopholes in the laws, and the lobbies that are present have enough power to make Rs AND Ds to not close said loopholes. The Rs are more guilty, and the Ds less guilty, but guilty is still guilty. Period.

:rolleyes:
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

It's a rich vs non-rich issue, Flaggy (D). :rolleyes:

There's only one party involved in trickle down. One. There's only one party masturbating to Ayn Rand. One. Bush Tax Cuts and now the Trump Tax Cut have gone all to the rich. Did Obama do that? No.

Flaggy (D)? If you think I'm the biggest lib on this board you're sorely mistaken. And comparing me to Flaggy? Really? That's gutless and low, even for you.
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

There's only one party involved in trickle down. One. There's only one party masturbating to Ayn Rand. One. Bush Tax Cuts and now the Trump Tax Cut have gone all to the rich. Did Obama do that? No.

Flaggy (D)? If you think I'm the biggest lib on this board you're sorely mistaken. And comparing me to Flaggy? Really? That's gutless and low, even for you.

I'm only comparing your extremism for the left compared to his extremism for the right. I will firmly state you don't post BS stories like he does. I am just commenting on your general leaning.

As far as tax laws, there is no R or D. It's all about the $ Party. The politicians, no matter who they are affiliated with, kowtow to the rich when it comes to loopholes, shell companies, whatever.
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

I'm only comparing your extremism for the left compared to his extremism for the right. I will firmly state you don't post BS stories like he does. I am just commenting on your general leaning.

As far as tax laws, there is no R or D. It's all about the $ Party. The politicians, no matter who they are affiliated with, kowtow to the rich when it comes to loopholes, shell companies, whatever.

Gutless Coward.
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Brent is the only person I know who values being devoid of an opinion over being right and doing what’s right. I’ve never seen anything like it.

I’d rather be a zealot for what’s right than sit on the sidelines like a coward never willing to take a side.
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut


The AP analysis also found that Republicans won as many as 22 additional U.S. House seats over what would have been expected based on the average vote share in congressional districts across the country.

A separate statistical analysis conducted for AP by the Princeton University Gerrymandering Project found the Republican edge in Michigan’s state House districts had only a 1-in-16,000 probability of occurring by chance; in Wisconsin’s Assembly districts, there was a mere 1-in-60,000 likelihood of it happening randomly, the analysis found.

https://www.apnews.com/fa6478e10cda4e9cbd75380e705bd380

Put another way, there are 29% more registered democrats than republicans in the US.
Across the whole country, there are 32% more elected republican state representatives than democrat state representatives - 4,134 GOP to 3,134 Dems

https://ballotpedia.org/Partisan_composition_of_state_houses

another 1,000 gerrymandered districts need mookie go
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Brent is the only person I know who values being devoid of an opinion over being right and doing what’s right. I’ve never seen anything like it.

I’d rather be a zealot for what’s right than sit on the sidelines like a coward never willing to take a side.

Just because I don't take your or Scooby's side on everything doesn't mean I don't take a side. Realize that, and you'll be a smarter person.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top