What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

Trump says the media is unfair. Leaks are unfair. General Flynn treated unfair.

What a ***** crybaby.
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

At least Schindler has stopped sending out Dic pics and is now concentrating on Trump. That's an improvement, I guess.

Is that the same guy? I feel like the community has already had this discussion.
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

Did anyone else see Trump's Health Care plan the other day? He pointed at Paul Ryan and said he was working on it. You all feel good now?
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

Is that the same guy? I feel like the community has already had this discussion.
I think it is. IIRC, this Schindler guy is actually pretty conservative or right wing, at least if it's the same guy. But I assume Trump's comments about the intelligence community are what he's worked up over.

Kind of proves the old adage about newspapers. Not very smart to get into a war of words with someone who buys ink by the barrel. Same way with the spy community. Probably not a great idea to go around insulting people who have both the technological ability, and inclination to use it, to listen to every conversation you have, read all your emails and texts and know what movie you pulled out of Redbox last week.
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

You know what X, Y, and Z are going to favor. W is out in the cold, including trade within their own jurisdiction (not international) because they are going to follow the regulations. Does that make sense for W?

Thank you for illustrating that trade needs negotiation.

Still don't see why taking into account international partners into regulations are a bad thing. You and others whine that Mexico and China have advantages, so why would we not want them to follow our rules (which are generally there to save lives)? It's not as if they don't see the advantages- China is quickly moving to curbing emissions.

Come on- get beyond Trade 101. Based on your posts, I'd figure that you were a free trade person. Which you would WANT fair trade.

It's a good illustration that all of this proposed protectionism, including banning travel, will not be good for our economy.
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...d-Russian-Intel-is-most-likely-much-more-fire

lolwut?



I think someone is either off their meds or it's going to be an interesting next month or two.

This really demonstrates the rock and hard place that the intelligence community is in. They are forced to spy on pretty much everyone, and keep an eye on conversations between us and everyone- with a focus on unfriendly countries. So when they encounter things were people in the US are breaking the law, but it's classified- what do they do?

Something has to give someplace- some will see the urgency to stop that. Sowden is a good example of that- and I appreciate what he did. If this is as big of a fire as it seems- especially with all of the focus on the leaks vs the message- IMHO, it's natural to find someone who is willing to leak it, and expose it.
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

By the way. Susan Sarandon is on with Chris Hayes on MSNBC right now showing why Hillary lost and why the Democratic Party will never win again.
 
By the way. Susan Sarandon is [...] now showing why Hillary lost and why the Democratic Party will never win again.

She airing footage of rural white voters with Sarah McLaughlin music in the background?
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

Screw impeachment, Trump is going to be forced to resign just to protect himself. He'll find some way of spinning it as a positive to his most in-the-tank supporters. It will be better than the alternative of a lengthy impeachment trial, which the RNC will have a strong interest in avoiding.

President Pence? Fine, I'll take lawful evil over chaotic evil, or Disappointed Father over Drunk Racist Uncle. Whatever floats your boat.
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

Screw impeachment, Trump is going to be forced to resign just to protect himself. He'll find some way of spinning it as a positive to his most in-the-tank supporters. It will be better than the alternative of a lengthy impeachment trial, which the RNC will have a strong interest in avoiding.

President Pence? Fine, I'll take lawful evil over chaotic evil, or Disappointed Father over Drunk Racist Uncle. Whatever floats your boat.

Some tinfoil hat people (yes, I was dabbling) might be proven right!
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

Great, sounds like most of Europe has surveillance goodies on Dumpster and his goons too.

http://www.newsweek.com/allies-intercept-russia-trump-adviser-communications-557283

This is scary sh*t:

As part of intelligence operations being conducted against the United States for the last seven months, at least one Western European ally intercepted a series of communications before the inauguration between advisers associated with President Donald Trump and Russian government officials, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

Moreover, a Baltic nation is gathering intelligence on officials in the Trump White House and executives with the president’s company, the Trump Organization, out of concern that an American policy shift toward Russia could endanger its sovereignty, according to a third person with direct ties to that nation’s government.

Most importantly:

These operations reflect a serious breakdown in the long-standing faith in the direction of American policy by some of the country’s most important allies. Worse, the United States is now in a situation that may be unprecedented—where European governments know more about what is going on in the executive branch than any elected American official. To date, the Republican-controlled Congress has declined to conduct hearings to investigate the links between Trump’s overseas business partners and foreign governments, or the activities between Russia and officials in the Trump campaign and administration—the very areas being examined by the intelligence services of at least two American allies.

This complete imbecile is putting us into situations that are going to wreak havoc. Jeezuz.
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

Donald Trump says US not committed to two-state Israel-Palestine solution

It's clear when listening to Trump use his words he has no fricking idea what he believes because he's clueless:

Asked what he thought about a two-state solution on Wednesday, Trump said: “I’m looking at two-state and one-state and I like the one that both parties like. I’m very happy with the one that both parties like,” he said.

Really? You're looking at a "two-state and a one-state"? Does he even know what that means? And you're really happy with the one they both like? In other words you don't have an informed opinion on the subject at all.

“The United States will encourage peace and really a great peace deal,” the US president said. “We will be working on it very, very diligently. But it is the parties themselves who must directly negotiate such an agreement.

“To be honest, if Bibi [Netanyahu] and the Palestinians, if Israel and the Palestinians are happy – I’m happy with the one they like the best.”

It's going to be great. The biggest deal ever and my people will deliver I assure you.

Seriously God - why?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top