I think she did a very good job as both. I have inside knowledge on her policy chops -- Dr. Mrs. worked with her in committee and it changed her opinion drastically. Before that experience she basically shared my opinion that it was nepotism gone wild. But she was very impressed with how well Hillary knew subjects and more that she just worked really hard. The other thing which I have mentioned before is that she listened. Whereas most Members use the time you're speaking to draw breath so they can just continue on with what they are saying, Hillary was, to her, remarkable in that she actually had two-way conversations and listened to people, particularly opponents. She was still very strong willed in insisting on the merits of her argument but you knew she had processed what you were saying and had digested the content and understood it fully.
Dr. Mrs. thought that in another life Hillary would have made a splendid jurist. Her instincts are, oddly, not advocacy, but trying to understand. Getting into a political marriage transformed her into a political animal, but again, just my wife's impression, that always seemed an overlay for the engine underneath which was just the desire to dig deep, find the root cause, and see how it all worked.
That's why I think she'd have made a great member of one of the EOP departments like HHS rather than a politician.