What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

FadeToBlack&Gold said:
Convince Trump voters of that, and explain how she's different from socialist, gun-crusader Hillary. Good luck! :)
Click to expand...

No thanks...they wouldnt vote for a Dem even if their name was Ronald Reagan. Let the GOPers and Trumpers vote for who they choose I just want Dems to show up and vote. :)
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Handyman said:
We arent going to agree on this...her fight for Consumer Protection beats most of what Hillary did and she doesnt have the baggage either. Hillary had the experience but no one was following her anywhere. If they were then the Dems would have voted for her not stayed home.

Now back to the Trumpster Fire...NBC is reporting that their sources say the Trump Transition Team and the White House did vet Flynn and knew all about his ties. Spicey again lied to everyone and got left out to dry. Link to the Tweet
Click to expand...
That is one thing I give her 100% credit for, hands-down, not even close to an argument.

Her commentary in the documentary "Maxed Out" is outstanding. Sorry, had to pop up for that comment. I am unwavering in that opinion.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Handyman said:
We arent going to agree on this...her fight for Consumer Protection beats most of what Hillary did and she doesnt have the baggage either. Hillary had the experience but no one was following her anywhere. If they were then the Dems would have voted for her not stayed home.

Now back to the Trumpster Fire...NBC is reporting that their sources say the Trump Transition Team and the White House did vet Flynn and knew all about his ties. Spicey again lied to everyone and got left out to dry. Link to the Tweet
Click to expand...

That would mean something if Rachel Maddow weren't a LIAR!!!!!
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

The voters that said no to Hillary because she's female imho are very few in number. She was simply unlikable on a giant scale and her name carried with it too much baggage. Never mind they ran a s**t campaign and too many would-be Dem voters stayed home.

Yet she still got more votes.

To say American isn't ready to elect a female president is a completely lazy argument.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Slap Shot said:
The voters that said no to Hillary because she's female imho are very few in number. She was simply unlikable on a giant scale and her name carried with it too much baggage. Never mind they ran a s**t campaign and too many would-be Dem voters stayed home.

Yet she still got more votes.

To say American isn't ready to elect a female president is a completely lazy argument.
Click to expand...
I was pumped when Palin was VP candidate....until she opened her mouth and started talking.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

I think it is awesome that Boeing thanked Trump for his hard work supporting American Manufacturing (paying for ads in Newspapers for him) whilst cutting hundreds of those jobs he worked so hard to protect!
 
Slap Shot said:
The voters that said no to Hillary because she's female imho are very few in number. She was simply unlikable on a giant scale and her name carried with it too much baggage. Never mind they ran a s**t campaign and too many would-be Dem voters stayed home.

Yet she still got more votes.

To say American isn't ready to elect a female president is a completely lazy argument.
Click to expand...

No, it's really not. I've said it before, but my beer league tram provided a stark example of the divide. The college educated were all for Hillary with the exception of two small business owners who went libertarian. The non-college half of the team all went Trump, and they weren't shy about using terms that are specifically aimed at the feminine gender to talk about Hillary.

It's possible they would've gone Trump anyway, but you can't tell me sexism didn't play a role in it.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

unofan said:
No, it's really not. I've said it before, but my beer league tram provided a stark example of the divide. The college educated were all for Hillary with the exception of two small business owners who went libertarian. The non-college half of the team all went Trump, and they weren't shy about using terms that are specifically aimed at the feminine gender to talk about Hillary.

It's possible they would've gone Trump anyway, but you can't tell me sexism didn't play a role in it.
Click to expand...

I don't think that's sexism. I think that's just in regard to Hillary specifically. I'm sure there's a lot of people who would use the C word to describe her. Including a lot of women.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Brenthoven said:
That was unneeded.
Click to expand...

That was the only reason any Republican supported Palin. Even after she opened her mouth Because she was hot. You know it, I know it, everyone knows why she was on the ticket. Just admit it and move on.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

rufus said:
That was the only reason any Republican thought Palin would be a good candidate. Because she was hot. You know it, I know it, everyone knows why she was on the ticket. Just admit it and move on.
Click to expand...

I was actually excited to see a woman on the ticket. I didn't know much about her, but figured she was a governor for a bit, so that's a good start. Then when I started learning about her, I cowered.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

You didn't know anything about her, but you supported her. At least initially. Because she was hot. Again, just admit it.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

rufus said:
I don't think that's sexism. I think that's just in regard to Hillary specifically. I'm sure there's a lot of people who would use the C word to describe her. Including a lot of women.
Click to expand...

And they just happen to use the same thing to describe Warren, and DWS, and Pelosi, and every other high ranking female in the Dem party. But that's just a coincidence, I'm sure.
 
unofan said:
And they just happen to use the same thing to describe Warren, and DWS, and Pelosi, and every other high ranking female in the Dem party. But that's just a coincidence, I'm sure.
Click to expand...

Yup. My dad has more nasty words about Warren than he did Hillary and he actually seems to ageee with her
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

unofan said:
And they just happen to use the same thing to describe Warren, and DWS, and Pelosi, and every other high ranking female in the Dem party. But that's just a coincidence, I'm sure.
Click to expand...

Well, no, I'll give you that. That seems to be a pattern.

In other news, it appears that assistant to the President on National Security Sebastien Gorka might be a fraud. Might not even have a Phd(at least, one that's accepted as been granted from a real instuitute of learning).

http://reynolds.web.unc.edu/gorka/

Another fine vetting job by the Trump administration.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top