TitleIXHockey
Golden Knight
Because they don't like her game or maybe even her personally. It doesn't mean she should be DQ'ed from the PK award, does it?
The problem is not the players, it's the voters. Who ever is voting for this thing aren't seriously considering D's and G's. And sometimes the way they vote they consider it more of a career award than a single season award. When ARD won as a Sr, per numbers as a Sr weren't as good as her Jr year. She should have won it it Jr year and not her Sr. year.
Clearly Jaques should win it (though 10 pf her goals are on the pp, does that devalue the quality of the goals? IDK), though Heise is 9 pts clear of #2, but even that historically doesn't mean much.
Hard to say on Watts.
Agreed on the voters though. With defenders it's hard to judge them because a lot of what they do isn't about points. If we had more robust stats like zone exits / entries, or even TOI it might be easier. Goaltenders it seems you have to have either a record breaking year or career. Not much place for someone like Corinne Schroeder, Lucy Morgan, or Rachel McQuigge, critical components of their teams' successes but not #1 in sv pct. (More as nominees than winners.)
I don't think it devalues her goals, especially as a defender. If it were 10 ENG though...