What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Patty Kaz

Re: Patty Kaz

Weird is establishing an award for the year’s best player and ignoring the most important games of the season..
Weird is making “in the clutch” a part of the criteria and *again* ignoring the part of the season that separates clutch performers from the wannabees..
Weird is saying academic achievement is part of the criteria and then basically making anyone who passed their classes eligible..
Weird is giving the award the day before the championship game because that’s what the men do..

lol it's nice to know that in a chaotic world, there are still some things you can count on. I asked a question and knew without any doubt that it would not get any substantive response. It's as comforting as the sunrise!

Cheers!
 
Re: Patty Kaz

With that logic Gretzky wasn't the best player the years he won that Hart but not the Stanley Cup.

Weird is the fact that you think all freshman have a 4.0
Weird is the fact that you have to trash an 18yr old girl because your pick lost to a freshman
Weird is that you think that a player gets better from Saturdays semi final to Sundays final and should, therefore, wait to present the award then.
Weird is the fact that you believe that the player with the most game winning goals (clutch)should win.

So, weirdo, keep in mind that the liable/slander laws are pretty gray. you don't want to end up getting pokechecked from behind with no ref to call the match penalty.
Happy trolling
 
Re: Patty Kaz

With that logic Gretzky wasn't the best player the years he won that Hart but not the Stanley Cup.

Weird is the fact that you think all freshman have a 4.0
Weird is the fact that you have to trash an 18yr old girl because your pick lost to a freshman
Weird is that you think that a player gets better from Saturdays semi final to Sundays final and should, therefore, wait to present the award then.
Weird is the fact that you believe that the player with the most game winning goals (clutch)should win.

So, weirdo, keep in mind that the liable/slander laws are pretty gray. you don't want to end up getting pokechecked from behind with no ref to call the match penalty.
Happy trolling

somebody help this nimrod out and explain what a pokecheck is
weird that you would not know what it is

reminds me of the date of a friend who thought "icing" meant they had to stop play to clean ice off of the puck
what a bimbo
 
Re: Patty Kaz

somebody help this nimrod out and explain what a pokecheck is
weird that you would not know what it is

reminds me of the date of a friend who thought "icing" meant they had to stop play to clean ice off of the puck
what a bimbo

I thought you were smarter than that. I'll try to explain it slowly so you can understand.

slander sometimes lands people in jail...got it?
once in jail there are many people that have not had, shall I say, relations...so they are very primitive and pushy toward newbies.
a pokecheck from behind from these pushy inmates could result in many problems...especially when there aren't any refs (corrections officers) around to help.

got it now moron?
 
Re: Patty Kaz

I thought you were smarter than that. I'll try to explain it slowly so you can understand.

slander sometimes lands people in jail...got it?
once in jail there are many people that have not had, shall I say, relations...so they are very primitive and pushy toward newbies.
a pokecheck from behind from these pushy inmates could result in many problems...especially when there aren't any refs (corrections officers) around to help.

got it now moron?

you may be dating your friend after all is said and done.
 
Re: Patty Kaz

I thought you were smarter than that. I'll try to explain it slowly so you can understand.

slander sometimes lands people in jail...got it?
once in jail there are many people that have not had, shall I say, relations...so they are very primitive and pushy toward newbies.
a pokecheck from behind from these pushy inmates could result in many problems...especially when there aren't any refs (corrections officers) around to help.

got it now moron?

One definition of stupid is making mistakes that you don’t realize are mistakes.
It was not enough for you to reveal that you are ignorant about hockey, now you reveal that you are ignorant about legalities as well. You have crossed the threshold of simply being wrong to officially being a D-SOB.
Slander is not punishable by incarceration, it falls under the realm of civil court.
Maybe you are a leftie, they certainly are trying to make any opinion they disagree with a criminal offense.
My advice, although you appear too stupid to take it, is to keep quiet.

so is anybody gonna challenge BC for the NE title next year, or is it going to be a cake walk again?
 
Last edited:
Re: Patty Kaz

look guy/girl/they/whatever you are. I was told to not engage you but you are such a POS that I can't help myself. What makes a grown person (I assume you're at least 25) write disparaging comments on a board about kids that are 17-23 years old? That officially makes you a POS...so anything that you state is meaningless. Like Hillary on her "Why I lost" tour. Your words are meaningless. I hope it's warm under that rock of yours.
 
Re: Patty Kaz

Ok here is another something to get the conversation back on track or start another whole new round of fighting :rolleyes:

Bach - The Best Senior
Baldwin - The 2nd Best on D
Campbell - The 2nd Best Goalie
Gabel - 2X NC$$ Champ, Watts can have the Kaz
Harmon - 2X NC$$Champ, Best D, Watts can have the Kaz
Howard - CHA'S Best
Lonergan - Watts light cast a shadow on her
Miano - 3rd best D, tough playing in the shadow of Watts light
Tiley - 2X NC$$ Champ, NC$$ Frozen 4 MOP, Best Goalie, Watts can have (Oh never mind) ;)
Watts - She deserved the Kaz over the other 9 IMHO, (but I bet she would trade it for the NC$$ Trophy)

The one player that did not make the final 10 and should have ( I should have started a MY PLAYER GOT SCREWED KAZ Thread): :)
Freshman Elizabeth Giguere of Clarkson;
ECAC 1st team, ECAC All Rookie, ECAC Rookie of the year
ECAC GMS22, G16 (2nd in ECAC) A24 (1st in the ECAC) +33 3rd in the ECAC
Overall GMS38 G25 A43 +50 Excludes NC$$ Tourney
All Freshman: 2nd behind Watts in Goals scored, 1st in Assists
Overall excluding NC$$ Tourney: 7th in Goals Scored, 2nd in Assists, 4th in Pts
NC$$ Tourney: GMS3 G2 A1
Without her Clarkson probably finishes 2nd to Colgate in the Regular Season and probably does not win the ECAC Championship or the NC$$ Tourney
I know NC$$ is not considered for the Kaz but to put a stamp on her freshman season as to why she should have been in the Top 10
Scores the Winner in Game 1 against Mercyhurst
Make the perfect pass to Gabel for the winner against Ohio State
Scores the Winner in the NC$$ Championship.

If this ain't deserving of Kaz Top Ten I do not know what is?
Who would I drop out: Miano (I now await TTT's wrath) ;)
 
Last edited:
Re: Patty Kaz

look guy/girl/they/whatever you are. I was told to not engage you but you are such a POS that I can't help myself. What makes a grown person (I assume you're at least 25) write disparaging comments on a board about kids that are 17-23 years old? That officially makes you a POS...so anything that you state is meaningless. Like Hillary on her "Why I lost" tour. Your words are meaningless. I hope it's warm under that rock of yours.

If you look back at my posts in this thread, at no time have I even used the eventual winner’s name. If you think that is what I said, it is in your own mind, and you are obviously distraught about it, and feel guilty. Seek professional help.

BTW, If you also go back to the beginning of the season, I declared this year would be an all ECAC final Clarkson vs. Colgate.
Gawd, it’s tough to be me!
That’s probably why the moderator gave me a title in red, because I’m so FN brilliant!
 
Re: Patty Kaz

Ok here is another something to get the conversation back on track or start another whole new round of fighting :rolleyes:

Bach - The Best Senior
Baldwin - The 2nd Best on D
Campbell - The 2nd Best Goalie
Gabel - 2X NC$$ Champ, Watts can have the Kaz
Harmon - 2X NC$$Champ, 2nd Best D, Watts can have the Kaz

Howard - CHA'S Best
Lonergan - Watts light cast a shadow on her
Miano - 3rd best D, tough playing in the shadow of Watts light
Tiley - 2X NC$$ Champ, NC$$ Frozen 4 MOP, Best Goalie, Watts can have (Oh never mind) ;)
Watts - She deserved the Kaz over the other 9 IMHO, (but I bet she would trade it for the NC$$ Trophy)

The one player that did not make the final 10 and should have ( I should have started a MY PLAYER GOT SCREWED KAZ Thread): :)
Freshman Elizabeth Giguere of Clarkson;
ECAC 1st team, ECAC All Rookie, ECAC Rookie of the year
ECAC GMS22, G16 (2nd in ECAC) A24 (1st in the ECAC) +33 3rd in the ECAC
Overall GMS38 G25 A43 +50 Excludes NC$$ Tourney
All Freshman: 2nd behind Watts in Goals scored, 1st in Assists
Overall excluding NC$$ Tourney: 7th in Goals Scored, 2nd in Assists, 4th in Pts
NC$$ Tourney: GMS3 G2 A1
Without her Clarkson probably finishes 2nd to Colgate in the Regular Season and probably does not win the ECAC Championship or the NC$$ Tourney
I know NC$$ is not considered for the Kaz but to put a stamp on her freshman season as to why she should have been in the Top 10
Scores the Winner in Game 1 against Mercyhurst
Make the perfect pass to Gabel for the winner against Ohio State
Scores the Winner in the NC$$ Championship.

If this ain't deserving of Kaz Top Ten I do not know what is?
Who would I drop out: Miano (I now await TTT's wrath) ;)

I certainly don't disagree with any of that
but you also forgot to say that your brilliant freshman is also the oldest, older than some seniors, I sure hope that isn't becoming a trend
I already said who I thought should get the PK, I'm sure she's happier with 2 NCA*****, those you earn, and share with those you earned it with
 
Re: Patty Kaz

but you also forgot to say that your brilliant freshman is also the oldest, older than some seniors, I sure hope that isn't becoming a trend

Ahh, that is a more than a fascinating tidbit, so the fighting nurses are running 21/22 yr old freshmen out there?
 
Re: Patty Kaz

Ahh, that is a more than a fascinating tidbit, so the fighting nurses are running 21/22 yr old freshmen out there?

Yes. Quebec has Cegep after high school. Its essentially a college and they have varsity teams and play in a league. Except they dont lose any NCAA or CIS eligibility. Giguere (who in my mind was the best F at the final 4) is a 1997 birth year, which is the same age as most teams seniors. Rookie on paper, but is a 21 year old. This is the same argument as Poulin and others who came from La Belle province. She will graduate at 25, just like Poulin. Now, if Team Canada ever gots its act together and invited the best players, she would have missed this year for the Olympics, making her an even older freshman.
 
Last edited:
Re: Patty Kaz

Yes. Quebec has Cegep after high school. Its essentially a college and they have varsity teams and play in a league. Except they dont lose any NCAA or CIS eligibility. Giguere (who in my mind was the best F at the final 4) is a 1997 birth year, which is the same age as most teams seniors. Rookie on paper, but is a 21 year old. This is the same argument as Poulin and others who came from La Belle province. She will graduate at 25, just like Poulin. Now, if Team Canada ever gots its act together and invited the best players, she would have missed this year for the Olympics, making her an even older freshman.

How many players does Clarkson have who did this program?
 
Back
Top