Patty Kaz

[thirdtime's . . .]

Re: Patty Kaz

Do you suppose the committee met for a re-count after the quarters so you-know-who wouldn't throw himself onto the Comm Ave tracks?

 

[vicb]

Re: Patty Kaz

Congrats to Darryl Watts, I think the committee got it right.

And now one more game for Loren Gabel to show that the committee may want to rethink the choice.

 

[shelfit]

Congrats to Darryl Watts, I think the committee got it right.

And now one more game for Loren Gabel to show that the committee may want to rethink the choice.

Except playoffs don't factor into the equation.

 

[vicb]

Re: Patty Kaz

Except playoffs don't factor into the equation.

Hence the after my statement. DUH!!!

 

[shelfit]

Hence the after my statement. DUH!!!

So it's a moot joke instead of a moot point. Got it. Thanks for clarifying.

 

[ARM]

Re: Patty Kaz

And now one more game for Loren Gabel to show that the committee may want to rethink the choice.

The list of Frozen Four MOPs is quite distinguished. Although Wilson-Bennet (3g, 1a) has set herself up for at least a shot at being the MOP even if her team loses.

 

[vicb]

Re: Patty Kaz

So it's a moot joke instead of a moot point. Got it. Thanks for clarifying.

You are certainly welcome.

 

[vicb]

Re: Patty Kaz

The list of Frozen Four MOPs is quite distinguished. Although Wilson-Bennet (3g, 1a) has set herself up for at least a shot at being the MOP even if her team loses.

Yep, she has to be the front runner at this point with the Goalie Van Dyk a close second from the Colgate side. For Clarkson it may come down to Tiley, Gabel or Giguere. Certainly which ever team wins tomorrow the MOP will probably come from the winning team of the 5 I have mentioned.

Colgate's scoring depth is what scares me about them compared to Clarkson's. I think the 3-0 shutout in the ECAC Title game by Clarkson surprised everyone. The first game at Cheel was 4-3 won by Colgate in OT. The second game was won by Clarkson 5-3 at Colgate.

 

[shelfit]

You are certainly welcome.

Lol

 

[TonyTheTiger20]

Re: Patty Kaz

Do you suppose the committee met for a re-count after the quarters so you-know-who wouldn't throw himself onto the Comm Ave tracks?

That'd be fine with me lol

 

[ARM]

Re: Patty Kaz

Yep, she has to be the front runner at this point with the Goalie Van Dyk a close second from the Colgate side. For Clarkson it may come down to Tiley, Gabel or Giguere. Certainly which ever team wins tomorrow the MOP will probably come from the winning team of the 5 I have mentioned.

Not necessarily. Say that Clarkson won 4-3, with the points spread all around, while W-B had two goals and an assist and the Raiders didn't have many shots. I could see her getting votes then. The scenario isn't likely, but the prospect of her then winning is.

 

[ARM]

Re: Patty Kaz

That'd be fine with me lol

Which part -- you throwing yourself on the tracks?

 

[Blackbeard]

Re: Patty Kaz

You are only allowed to win once

Since when? Is this something recent?

Botterill won it twice.

 

[Timothy A]

Re: Patty Kaz

Since when? Is this something recent?

Botterill won it twice.

 

[joecct]

Re: Patty Kaz

...Anyway, this doesn't even come close to making up for missing the FF, but it does mean the future is BRIGHT up in Chestnut Hill.

Bright is in Allston, or is there something going on with the Amazon bid that you have inside information on?

 

[Leather helmet]

Re: Patty Kaz

Rumor has it that Watts will follow the lead of recent Hobey Baker winners and go one-and-done.

 

[FiveHoleFrenzy]

Re: Patty Kaz

Rumor has it that Watts will follow the lead of recent Hobey Baker winners and go one-and-done.

Wouldn't she have to take a pay cut to do so? And is that a positive lead or a negative lead...

 

[pokechecker]

Re: Patty Kaz

And now one more game for Shea Tiley to show that the committee may want to rethink the choice.

fixt it 4U

Except playoffs don't factor into the equation.

correct, the Patty K is D1 women's college hockey's award for the best player during the regular season
leaving the door open for some wealthy person or family to establish an award to the YEARS best D1 women's college hockey player
hopefully when they do they won't establish a bunch of criteria that they then ignore

 

[TonyTheTiger20]

Re: Patty Kaz

hopefully when they do they won't establish a bunch of criteria that they then ignore

Who do you think should win the Patty Kaz and why do you think the committee should ignore everything other than "academic achievement"?

You are very salty over this! It's kind of weird!

 

[pokechecker]

Re: Patty Kaz

Weird is establishing an award for the year’s best player and ignoring the most important games of the season..
Weird is making “in the clutch” a part of the criteria and *again* ignoring the part of the season that separates clutch performers from the wannabees..
Weird is saying academic achievement is part of the criteria and then basically making anyone who passed their classes eligible..
Weird is giving the award the day before the championship game because that’s what the men do..