What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Patty Kaz

Re: Patty Kaz

TonyTheTiger20 said:
Maybe at the school you root for, but not at a real school.

I had a 2.7, although I was a math major and the realm of pure mathematics (vs. applied) kicked my *** lol
Click to expand...

I took two 600 level (ie grad level) math classes my senior year (Calculus of N-dimensional Manifolds), and I don't know if it was 'senioritis' or if I had just hit the wall with regard to my math abilities, but they KICKED MY BUTT. No, I did not get a B. I also didn't go on to grad school.
 
Re: Patty Kaz

pokechecker's only A was in A#ole. Grant, I'm sure you'll be more successful than that troll.
PC, are you coming Saturday? if so come say hi. we can exchange insults. especially if BC is down by 2 with 1 minute to go.
 
Re: Patty Kaz

Quiet Riot said:
pokechecker's only A was in A#ole. Grant, I'm sure you'll be more successful than that troll.
PC, are you coming Saturday? if so come say hi. we can exchange insults. especially if BC is down by 2 with 1 minute to go.
Click to expand...

I seem to recall you in that class, you were the one with the brown nose, but you didn't do it right and got a D-

so you gonna go crying to the mods?

OMG, maybe the mod will ban me!!

No, I'm sticking with my original statement, Tiley for the win, most of the rest are IMO not even eligible for the award due to academics.

"Selection criteria includes outstanding individual and team skills, sportsmanship, performance in the clutch, personal character, competitiveness and a love of hockey. Consideration is also given to academic achievement and civic involvement."
 
Last edited:
Re: Patty Kaz

pokechecker said:
Tiley for the win.

"Selection criteria includes outstanding individual and team skills, sportsmanship, performance in the clutch, personal character, competitiveness and a love of hockey. Consideration is also given to academic achievement and civic involvement."
Click to expand...

If I had had a vote, Clarkson's #35 would have gotten it. Might be a little late though for her to win. Hope this entry doesn't get me banned from the forum (guilt by association?).
 
Last edited:
Re: Patty Kaz

bluffrinkrat said:
If I had had a vote, Clarkson's #35 would have gotten it. Might be a little late though for her to win. Hope this entry doesn't get me banned from the forum (guilt by association?).
Click to expand...

Not even close when you consider what DW has achieved in her first year at BC. It is not even debatable. If not DW, then Gable would be the next obvious choice for what she accomplished this year.
 
Re: Patty Kaz

Gabel's play for Clarkson this year has been fantastic. The best in the program history from a statistics standpoint. But even I just don't see her winning with the season Watt's had.
 
Re: Patty Kaz

Do we know who the committee is and who they vote for or is it not like that? Gonna go look for this USCHO article that is being referenced.
 
Re: Patty Kaz

Puckdrop14 said:
Not even close when you consider what DW has achieved in her first year at BC. It is not even debatable. If not DW, then Gable would be the next obvious choice for what she accomplished this year.
Click to expand...

DW is a freshman; that's working against her. It also doesn't help that she plays in a conference full of cupcakes. I think Gabel's numbers are close enough to her's, she's leading the #1 team in the country, and she's played much better competition all season. I'd be very surprised if Gabel doesn't win.
 
EastFan1 said:
Why does the Kaz award have "performance in the clutch" as a factor but then vote before play-offs?
Click to expand...

As some Cornell goalie once said (not Dryden BTW), it's just one game. The PK is for a whole season's body of work and Daryl Watts had one heck of a season.

That being said - Gabel was robbed!!! :)
 
Re: Patty Kaz

Timothy A said:
Watts is cooked then.
Click to expand...
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/giphy.gif">

Timothy A said:
So Watts and Campbell are out then. Too bad.
Click to expand...
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/giphy.gif">

Timothy A said:
Bach's done more with less, she's the winner.
Click to expand...
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/giphy.gif">

pokechecker said:
why do they have academic achievement as a factor and then ignore it?
Click to expand...
Let it go. If you want an award for GPA, start one yourself. Just because something is "a factor" doesn't mean it's "the only thing considered." But as is always the case, you know this, you're just trolling.

This is an award for the top player. The top player won the award. Sorry it bothers you so much, snowflake <3

Anyway, this doesn't even come close to making up for missing the FF, but it does mean the future is BRIGHT up in Chestnut Hill.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top