5MN, what's that a map of?
I'm going to guess US_military_bases_in_the_world_2007
But that's just a guess
Good guess.
What are the various shades?
What are the various shades?
How you get "permission" to use anything in Somalia with their lack of government is a good question
Relations with Michelle Bachmann?BTW, what's a squirmish?
Relations with Michelle Bachmann?
It was actually the other idiot:
[video]http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/sarah-palin-wonders-aloud-if-libya-squirmis[/video]
My point entirely. You can't tell the future, so you can't make guarantees. Bush didn't simply strike back after 9/11. He articulated an entirely new doctrine of engagement (the 2002 speech on the national security strategy of the United States). It was a lot bigger than just striking back at OBL. He learned to be a proper neocon. Unfortunately.
As for Clinton, your memory is a bit selective. Ask the Rwandans about Clinton's interventionism. His campaign was almost entirely focused on domestic politics, and he took office in the shadow of Operation Restore Hope's failure (I like GHWB as much as the next guy, but that one was on him). It took a genocide to get Clinton to authorize NATO in the Balkans, and even then he dragged his feet.
Note the first line -- I have problems with the way Obama did it. That's called conditional agreement. You may not be familiar with it coming from a land where (affected western tough guy pose on) "you're either with us or against us."
That's right. I knew that too, darn it. You know Palin really is a whiz with Foreign Policy. She can see Russia from her house.
Did Truman make us errand boys for the UN in Korea? Did FDR make us errand boys for the Brits with Lend Lease?
Unilateral action is great when you're under attack. When you're working with a coalition with common interests intervening in a third party conflict... not so good.
You guys are "thinking" with the wrong head. As usual.
Right, two seconds of criticism for the "smartest guy in the room,"
Obama Derangement Syndrome really runs deep.
I'm surprised nobody's ginned up "grounds for impeachment" yet. Something to look forward to in the election year I guess.
_____gate is worse because the attachment of "gate" is completely unnecessary and pointless. At least "doctrine", while unoriginal, is a term that applies.What more annoying? The _____ Doctrine or ______gate scandal?