USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
- Thread starter joecct
- Start date
- Status
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
It's either a flaw or a planned changed with the board change. I don't think I've seen a Cafe thread close since then.
It's either a flaw or a planned changed with the board change. I don't think I've seen a Cafe thread close since then.
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
Heh - took me a second, there. Thought you were talking about a tax form...
Heh - took me a second, there. Thought you were talking about a tax form...
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
They won't fire the people responsible for this:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/20/AR2010102004187.html
I've seen a multi-national corporation align its computer systems and databases, replacing code across the whole enterprise and consolidating dozens of databases...the project was on time, spent almost 50% of what the FBI is spending. Based on the financial and transactional basis of that system, it was far more complicated than what is described by the FBI. Good news is that by the time the FBI gets it in it will be obsolete and they'll start a new $600million dollar project to replace this one.
Re-defining 'close enough for government work".
They won't fire the people responsible for this:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/20/AR2010102004187.html
I've seen a multi-national corporation align its computer systems and databases, replacing code across the whole enterprise and consolidating dozens of databases...the project was on time, spent almost 50% of what the FBI is spending. Based on the financial and transactional basis of that system, it was far more complicated than what is described by the FBI. Good news is that by the time the FBI gets it in it will be obsolete and they'll start a new $600million dollar project to replace this one.
Re-defining 'close enough for government work".
unofan
Well-known member
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
So I take it by your evasion to a simple question that you're tacitly admitting it's the online equivalent of yellow journalism?
Seriously, "bigjournalism.com"? Really?
Yeah, if it's not on the National Lawyers Guild website, it doesn't exist.
So I take it by your evasion to a simple question that you're tacitly admitting it's the online equivalent of yellow journalism?
Seriously, "bigjournalism.com"? Really?
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
That's the depth of analysis we've all come to expect from you. Do you dispute the accuracy of the story? If not then S*T*F*U. I didn't "evade" anything, Mr. Berger, I ignored a typical dumass remark. Your ignorance about the site isn't an argument, it's a confession.
That's the depth of analysis we've all come to expect from you. Do you dispute the accuracy of the story? If not then S*T*F*U. I didn't "evade" anything, Mr. Berger, I ignored a typical dumass remark. Your ignorance about the site isn't an argument, it's a confession.
Last edited:
WeWantMore
New member
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
Yellow journalism? The story was written by an AP writer.
Yellow journalism? The story was written by an AP writer.
unofan
Well-known member
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
http://bigjournalism.com/author/cbrim/
She's an AP writer? Looks to me more like a typical washington lobbyist hack.
http://bigjournalism.com/author/cbrim/
She's an AP writer? Looks to me more like a typical washington lobbyist hack.
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
Well, that and the fact that moderators never closed threads at all - they locked themselves after 1,000 posts.
That functionality clearly didn't make it into this version, however. Or it hasn't been turned on yet.
Well, that and the fact that moderators never closed threads at all - they locked themselves after 1,000 posts.
That functionality clearly didn't make it into this version, however. Or it hasn't been turned on yet.
WeWantMore
New member
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
,
,
WeWantMore
New member
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
Oh my fault, I thought you were referring to the 2nd link, which was the Portland voting story, which was done by an AP writer.
Oh my fault, I thought you were referring to the 2nd link, which was the Portland voting story, which was done by an AP writer.
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
That's the story I linked to, Portland, ME. The other one didn't come from me. Plus only a heartland lib would construe my remarks as NOT having something to do with expanding the franchise.
That's the story I linked to, Portland, ME. The other one didn't come from me. Plus only a heartland lib would construe my remarks as NOT having something to do with expanding the franchise.
Last edited:
unofan
Well-known member
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
Would you like to rephrase your answer?
Would you like to rephrase your answer?
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
Go back and check the link in my post, azz. You'll find it links to the story about expanding the franchise. Stop trying to pretend you're James Martin Davis.
Go back and check the link in my post, azz. You'll find it links to the story about expanding the franchise. Stop trying to pretend you're James Martin Davis.
Last edited:
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QbNGnvBR7k
Hilarious spot. Is it possible Barney will be retired, so he can devote all of his time to his little home based "personal services" business?
It's still unlikely. But he's evidently got a challenge on his hands.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QbNGnvBR7k
Hilarious spot. Is it possible Barney will be retired, so he can devote all of his time to his little home based "personal services" business?
It's still unlikely. But he's evidently got a challenge on his hands.
Last edited:
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
Lame. Who doesn't like the shakeup of a new thread, and new threadtitle?
Muslim curtains in the white house was cute, but are we really going to use it for the next 2(or 6) years?
Lame. Who doesn't like the shakeup of a new thread, and new threadtitle?
Muslim curtains in the white house was cute, but are we really going to use it for the next 2(or 6) years?
unofan
Well-known member
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
That is the link in your post, dumbass. You made 2 different posts with 2 different links. The first one (#1091 in this thread, since apparently you can't remember it) had nothing to do with expanding the voter rolls.
That is the link in your post, dumbass. You made 2 different posts with 2 different links. The first one (#1091 in this thread, since apparently you can't remember it) had nothing to do with expanding the voter rolls.
Last edited:
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
Muslin curtains are boring now. Someone PLEASE make up a new thread.
Muslin curtains are boring now. Someone PLEASE make up a new thread.
Re: Obama XVI: Muslin curtains in the White House!!!
Yes, I see now, Mr. Berger, your initial non response was in response to an earlier post. It's hard to keep your non responses straight, since all you're ever interested in is changing the subject and "proving" what a great lawyer you are. You're so wrapped up in process. Why don't you take on the point I made? Uh, expanding the franchise.
Yes, I see now, Mr. Berger, your initial non response was in response to an earlier post. It's hard to keep your non responses straight, since all you're ever interested in is changing the subject and "proving" what a great lawyer you are. You're so wrapped up in process. Why don't you take on the point I made? Uh, expanding the franchise.
Last edited:
- Status