Go read my posts. My point all along has been that the affluent save plenty on taxes (Kerry is one example)...and that there was alot of complaining about about how much they pay. But gave no opinion on whether it was the right thing or not... and did say early on that the tax burden is pretty close to appropriate. I still believe all of these things and the whole thing got rolling when someone disagreed with my point...but failed to substantiate their position.
I've come to learn there are several levels of awareness. One where politics shades their opinions. Another that once a point is made, folks disagree and then proceed to make a different point. And the last where some think you said something entirely different that what you did say.
Well, I've been caught twice this week with false reports/hoaxes/etc. so...
IF THIS IS TRUE, he deserves all the backlash he has coming. I can just imagine Fox news is already foaming at the mouth... Although, after getting burned on the shirley sherrod (sp?) deal, perhaps they're going to sit on this. Who knows...
Did you forgot to mention that the White House also got burned, as did the NAACP? You mention only Fox which is kind of dubious on your part, after all Sherrod named names of the White House Staffers who called her.
I don't understand the demonization of Fox on this one. They reported the story, same as CNN and MSNBC. Breitbart appears on Fox occasionally but he doesn't work for them.
I mean, I understand the demonization, I just don't understand what fake rationale they're using for it in this case.
I don't understand the demonization of Fox on this one. They reported the story, same as CNN and MSNBC. Breitbart appears on Fox occasionally but he doesn't work for them.
I mean, I understand the demonization, I just don't understand what fake rationale they're using for it in this case.
However, dxmnkd316 chose to call out only Fox as the perpretrator in this case; when the White House called Sherrod and demanded her resignation without knowing the facts.
mmmmm.... pretty sure the WHITE HOUSE is calling out Fox.
FWIW, IMO, Obama is just as much an idiot as G W Bush was as President.
Mine too...and he is spineless too just like GW. Sad really.
Why is Fox being singled out? Because the charge came from somewhere on a right-wing blog, and Fox is right-wing. Guilt by association. As noted, everyone else picked up the story. If it were an isolated incident, it *would* be unfair to target Fox.
But it's not a very isolated incident, is it? Fox has a proven track record of dropping to their knees whenever some hysterical right-wing blogger drops trou.
Have any of your guys read the "leaked" classified information on WikiLeaks.org? Seems a lot of islamist civilians are getting killed on Obama's watch.
How on earth can someone "leak" 75,000 classified documents?
Guilt by association. That's fair.
Sorry, I don't play that game.
Have any of your guys read the "leaked" classified information on WikiLeaks.org? Seems a lot of islamist civilians are getting killed on Obama's watch.
How on earth can someone "leak" 75,000 classified documents?
Who said anything about fair? I don't play that game.
Politics isn't fair, and nobody knows that better than Fox, where it seems the main criteria for newsworthiness is whether a story is useful, rather than whether it's true.
So I'm not going to shed any tears for them. They're adults. They know the game they're playing.
Who said anything about fair? I don't play that game.