I'm willing to give Anastos the benefit of the doubt, but I am not impressed at all. It appears to be true, if a Twitter post from the director of the MSU Alumni Association carries any weight. Here's the thing - guy's been CCHA commissioner for 13 years, so maybe he knows a little about how the game has changed in that time. But how does that translate to coaching? He hasn't been a coach of any kind at a collegiate level for what, 20 years? How is he going to know about motivating and leading players, and how to reach individual players? Is this about rescuing a loyal Spartan because he's not going to have much of a conference to lead in a couple of years? Most of all, how does this hire help MSU get back to where it has been as a program?
I'm going to trust that Mark Hollis has done his due diligence, and that he looked around the country at various assistant coaches who were young and who could have come in and energized things. If not - and if this is about loyalty - then forget it.