Re: Notre Dame Hockey 2014-15: The year of the Freshman
I just wanted to take a minute to say that I definitely enjoyed our trip there (results notwithstanding).
Now this is the right attitude. UML dominated the Irish on Thursday and came out with a point on Friday and 3 points on the road
still isn't enough. You should have a conversation with our coach who feels a goal of a "top-4 finish" is a good enough target to aim for.
14 games in is enough for an in-season evaluation and it isn't going well.
103:11 of power play time so far this season and we have 4 PP goals. That's 4 goals in nearly 2 full games of action,
and up a man (or two even sometimes) and they've managed four goals. Or taking it as little further 96:49 of time starting and finishing a PP without a goal. 5 periods of no goals is bad enough. When it is nearly 5 periods worth of PP time with no goals? And that's on top of the utter failure of the PP in the second half of last season.
Faceoffs -- once an area of extreme strength for this program -- have been awful. And trending downward. Notre Dame's own stats have us winning fewer than half through 14 games, and that's with 10 of the 14 at home, when faceoffs are traditionally easier to win because your coach still has last change. Of late faceoffs have been horrible. Friday was embarrassing. Notre Dame has been generous too with the scorekeeping. Friday it was 35-26 in favor of UML and by my reckoning UML probably controlled the play a half dozen times more than they were "credited" for.
50/50 pucks in the corners and along the walls have been heavily in favor of the other guys. There are two issues with this. Jackson has supposedly structured his team to play a quicker transition game in response to the different styles of most HE teams so why are we getting bogged down in so many scrums and battles along the walls? And why are we losing so many? How many times do we hear the praises sung of all the ancillary personnel of the program most often led by the strength and conditioning guy? Too many times, although I admit I have yet to hear that this year. Of course we are reminded at
every home game during the ridiculous and tedious opening video introduction how hard our guys work at strength and conditioning.
Blown leads. Notre Dame has taken it as their mission I guess to prove the axiom of the 2 goal lead being the worst lead in hockey. Twice in one weekend against Vermont and Friday against UML we had 2-0 leads. We won one of those games.
The excuses have been that we're playing two basically completely untested goaltenders and that we're very young. On the surface that seems reasonable since both are true. A closer look though and that gets blown out of the water.
Our goaltending has been solid and occasionally brilliant. Katunar has been far better than I would have predicted. He uses his size well and he literally saved the tie Friday with a perfectly played save after Russo's nearly unforgivable turnover as the OT wound down (a gaff that I'd sit him a game for -- there HAVE to be consequences at some point for this team's repeated careless and stupid play with the puck). Through 14 games I think our goalies have played as well or better than their counterparts 180 feet down the ice 11 times. And the relative youth of the team? Boston University is younger. Notre Dame has 15 skaters who have played all or all but one game and 6 are freshmen. BU also has 15 skaters who have played all or all but one game and 7 of them are freshmen. All that youth came into a team that was awful last season (10-21-4) and had a first year coach. Today they are 8-1-1 and will likely be the number one team in the NCAA when the new polls come out tomorrow. Jackson's own history here suggests that having an unusually large freshman class need not be a detriment. In 2010-11 skating more freshman than we do now the team was 9-3-1 at the same point in the season (following the games before Thanksgiving) with a win over a number one BC team as well as a road win against the 2010-11 CCHA regular season champion UofM team.
There are some bright spots. Russo has played well
at even strength. Anders Bjork and Jake Evans have been very good as freshmen. Bjork has been a great penalty killer and Evans has shown great instincts in the offensive zone and has consistently gotten better in his own end. DiPauli is having his best season by far and has been the best all around forward on the team. I'd like to see him stronger in the faceoff circle but it's only been the last few games where he's taken the brunt of them so he'll have an opportunity to get better.
Chemistry on the ice has been very slow to develop. The power play continues to take 6 steps back for every step forward. The penalty kill has been mediocre (outside of the the goalies) 6th in the league in goals for. 8th in goals against (not the fault of either Katunar or Petersen, they sit 7th and 8th in save % out of the 26 goalies who have seen action) 12th in the power play. 7th in the PK. More NHL draft picks than any team in Hockey East. Twice as many as the 3 teams we are 2-2-2 against
COMBINED.
Jackson and Pooley are once again doing far less with far more than they did in their first few seasons here. There hasn't been a season of sustained excellence since 2010-1011. Playing in a supposed dump of a building fielding teams with half as many NHL draft picks and rosters made up either entirely or almost entirely by guys who committed to the previous head coach. In 6 seasons at the Joyce the program under Jackson had a winning % of .625 (.661 if you discount the first season), a 6 tourney wins in the NCAAs, 2 trips to the Frozen Four and played for a national championship. In 4 seasons so far at the CFIA the winning % is .577, no trips to the FF and an 0-2 record in the NCAAs with one embarrassingly bad performance in 2013 and getting completely outcoached in a game the team should have won in 2014. The final CCHA playoff title was a nice prize, but the last edition of the CCHA was the weakest one in Jackson's tenure with only 4 teams finishing the season over .500 overall, the fewest over the last 8 seasons of the league's lifespan and only 2 teams in the NCAAs, the fewest of any NCAA tournament since the field expanded to 16 teams in 2003 (there were also only 2 in 2005).
But we've got a great goal horn. Maybe the best one in college hockey.