What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Northeastern 2024-25: Last Days (Maybe) for the Old Barn

I don't come here very often anymore (what can I say, whining about refs on Twitter is far more fun) but it was interesting to read back and see Rossi calling the ceiling of this team way back during the Denver weekend. I can't say I agreed then, but it looks much more clear now.

I agree that the forward talent outside of the top line isn't there and that in retrospect we were too bullish on Sebastian. Don't think anyone really realized how poor the level of play at SAC was until Letourneau added a comparison. (More on him later.) The ECAC transfers have been particularly disappointing. I do still believe Connor has "it" but right now "it" involves more penalties than points. The bottom six is mostly talentless, especially down the middle, and the very real chance that Williams turns pro, McGuire graduates, and Sebastian and Moore are both shown the door leaving us with four new centers needed next year is daunting.

I am more worried about the disparity in talent level perception before recruits get here vs. after they're here though. The likes of Colangelo, St. Louis, and Fontaine (whose rise is being embellished here, he's not playing head and shoulders better than he did for NU the way Colangelo did) have shown they have talent outside of this system while forwards with pedigree on the inside, the likes of Sebastian, Erdman, Poitras, Tellier, Fisher, and even Connor so far have underwhelmed here. I am not sure that it's fully a coaching problem so much as a talent scouting problem, as evidenced by players like the Hughes brothers who have flopped miserably after NU as well as others like the Jacksons who are pretty much the same, but there's enough smoke to say the coaching isn't helping matters. We have also still had quite a bit of individual forward success of late in spite of the overall decline, Lund would be a serious Hobey candidate if the team was in the top 10, Hryckowian was great last year and overshadowed by the generational freshman talent on Comm Ave, etc. So why is the coaching working great for a select few but not at all for the majority?

I will give the coaches a pass for some of the forward talent deficiencies because of the talent exodus they've fallen victim to, it isn't their fault that the Jacksons decided to leave together for the desert when Jim moved up, or that Will Smith changed to BC even though his personal preference was NU, there was nothing they could have done about his family connections there. Or that Dean Letourneau was not ready to play college hockey this year straight from his backyard. During the Keefe era enough forward talent has gone to other schools to make an entire forward lineup that is very possibly better than our actual forward lineup, and that is something you can't just magically recover from, and even last year hit a home run with Campbell on the incoming side. Sometimes things just don't work out, the coaches aren't the ones out here breaking Michael Fisher and Ben Miller in half every year or seemingly losing their #1 center to injury every fall. But the talent they've identified and landed has been underwhelming and looks to get worse by the year, with Ben Wilmott sputtering then flipping after being one of their signature targets on August 1, Haeden Ellis doing nothing in his new OHL home, Grayson Badger and James Fisher going from recruiting wins to also-rans, the list goes on and on. Even Letourneau is still searching for his first collegiate goal. I think talent identification and projection is by far the biggest black mark on the Keefe era so far, so many of these kids are either not as good as those who came before or are peaking at 16 and trending down from there. NU had NHL draft picks every year between I believe Kevin Roy in 2012 and the draft class of 2022, which had 8 drafted NU affiliates at one point. Since then, they were shut out in 2023, barely snuck Connor in for 2024, and nobody in the future pipeline looks to have serious draft pedigree. They haven't dove into the CHL yet either. It looks like they are falling behind and we all see it.

Having said that, I do not think that means it's time to fire the coaching staff, it's a zero sum sport and you can't be on top every year or find Adam Gaudette and Justin Hryckowian in every class. Greg Carvel went from the national title to the Hockey East basement in basically a single season. Norm Bazin has gone from the top to the bottom and seems to be on top again. They deserve more than an immediate white flag, especially with the arena issues they're facing and have been facing for years now, frankly. But they also are objectively not doing well enough. The offensive scheme is plain, lifeless, and useless. The special teams are the worst in the NCAA and it's not close. The scheme that may have been innovative in 2014 is dead in the water in 2024. They seem to be the worst team in the country at overcoming a single injury to anyone of remote importance. The talent they choose to hype up, either because they genuinely believe their own poor assessments or because they feel obligated to hype up their guys whether they believe it or not, is generally untalented. They hitched their horse to Choupani last year and Sebastian this year as breakout forwards and failed miserably at both. They need to correct the things they can control. Maybe after the year they'll get a new assistant coach to replace the guy they had to break the glass on and pull out of a front office in mid-October. I think realistically we're still a couple of years away from the change being warranted. But the worry is justified.
 
Last edited:
Caught Deerfield v Salisbury at the Flood- Marr tourney yesterday. It was my first chance to see NU commit F Connor Davis of Salisbury. It was a tight game with neither team sustaining any offenive attack. In spite of that, Davis still showed well. Not big, not small. Agile skater, straight ahead and changing direction. Showed good vision with the puck. Also was quick to read the play and pounce defensively. Salisbury lost, 3-0, but Davis played well.
 
I didn't watch todays game but a look at the box score shows nothing new. 3-1 loss. Out shot 35-20, 29-13 in the last two periods. 13 shots from the forwards. Eli Sebastien the only forward with 3 shots. Lemay and Borgesi also had 3. 0/4 on the PP. Allowed a PP goal. Another penalty for #14. Won 26 faceoffs, lost 34. Jack Williams didn't take any draws and scored the lone goal on his only shot. It's evident that he's playing hurt. Did anybody else get a chance to see it?
 
I didn't watch todays game but a look at the box score shows nothing new. 3-1 loss. Out shot 35-20, 29-13 in the last two periods. 13 shots from the forwards. Eli Sebastien the only forward with 3 shots. Lemay and Borgesi also had 3. 0/4 on the PP. Allowed a PP goal. Another penalty for #14. Won 26 faceoffs, lost 34. Jack Williams didn't take any draws and scored the lone goal on his only shot. It's evident that he's playing hurt. Did anybody else get a chance to see it?

Yes. As usual, 1st was best period. Once the 2nd started this game was never in doubt. Dumb penalty to start the 2nd. Presto, 1-0 Friars. They got beat to every puck most of the night. I saw Williams goal, very nice, but it was on a busted play and a bad bounce that freed him up behind the PC D. Immediately NU was on a PP after that, but they never were able to set up for anything meaningful. PC applied more pressure and scored a pretty easy goal.........i beat the traffic out of the lot after that.
 
I watched it on ESPN + and it wasn't pretty. The final score wasn't a reflection of the game. It was much worse. However, my prediction from early October seems dead balls accurate. I simply don't see more than a couple more wins on the schedule. Sadly, as I have indicated in prior posts, the root issue isn't effort, it's talent. They try like a remedial student in an honors organic chemistry class. However, no matter how much they try, study and practice..they fail!
 
Last edited:
I watched via the stream, and it was abysmal. Spent most of the game pinned in their own end. Occasional trips to the O-zone were short-lived and unproductive. Only real scoring threats were the Williams and Lund breakaways. Whitehead kept it respectable on paper. It is what it is.
 
They are up 3 zip early in the 3rd crazy luck? and all Whitehead. This team is absolutely so hard to follow
 
Last edited:
Totally different team tonight. The first wasn’t perfect but whitehead came up big and the penalty kill was excellent. Following that they just played real hockey and capitalized on some of their chances. Nice to see more urgency to neutral pucks. Just a much better effort than what we have been seeing. I thought they also did a great job limiting Q’s chances. If they play like this the rest of the season I’ll be a happy fan win or lose.
 
Wow...hair finally on fire. A very welcome change in more ways than one. On to an apparently vulnerable Flagship.
 
Well, I didn't think I'd see another win this soon. I'm happy to drop an L on Quinnipiac, too. Are they really going to put on another too-late second half charge?
 
Packed house. Playoff-like atmosphere. Two shutouts, five games with only one goal scored = 2.42 goals per game. No sustained presence in the O-zone. The 41 shots last night look good but only a handful were challenging.

Still searching for rock bottom.
 
It seems like the program has been on a decline from Keefe’s first year until now. What are the thoughts people have on his performance?
 
It seems like the program has been on a decline from Keefe’s first year until now. What are the thoughts people have on his performance?

Oh please all of the snowflakes on here always think all the coaches did a great job. The issue is that aside from Fern who took them to the frozen four 40 years ago and Jim who in the later half of his coaching tenure had success, the program has been a back water of HE. Northeastern and the admin under Acun are like NYU, they don't care about athletics at all. It just an accutriment to education and our program may not even break even. Keefe is a marginal coach in my view. However, that's not what's killing the program it's NIL and the portal. Ask Gunner Fontaine if only we had him this season. The fact is that the team hasn't won an NCAA tournament game in 40 years should tell you that it wouldn't not have mattered if we had Parker, Yost, York and Red Barrinson rolled into one because we would still mostly suck.
 
...However, that's not what's killing the program it's NIL and the portal...

This. My views on NIL and the portal are pretty clear from earlier posts so no need to repeat. And the apparently muddled arena situation doesn't help.

As for the Flagship weekend, all I can say is that NU must be the Jekyll/Hyde of college hockey.
 
Last edited:
I disagree a bit I guess. We see flashes of a competitive hockey team, or atleast top 6, it’s just that team doesn’t show up every night. I don’t think the coaching staff has the ability to inspire/motivate a team night in night out. I also think the abysmal special teams is a coaching problem.

Where I do agree that it’s a skill issue is the bottom two lines. An average bottom 6 could occasionally make up for some inconsistency. I think the problem there is losing the kids who have moved on who probably should have been on those lines. Some of that is likely also coaching.
 
Back
Top