Re: Nice Planet © 2009
Re: Nice Planet © 2009
Re: Nice Planet © 2009
I might need my memory refreshed on this sitation, but wasn't the bias against the Duke lacrosse team specifically aimed at rich, spoiled white kids?
Sure. Disgraced, disbarred and imprisoned DA Mike Nifong wanted to be elected to a full term in his own right and was willing to put those boys in prison for 20 years each, in one of the most cynical abuses of our legal system in decades. He needed black votes and his plan was to curry those voters by appearing to be standing up for a "sister" who'd been victimized by white, rich, jocks at the hated, racist Duke. Thus my response to Foxton: it IS politically correct to judge white guys by their color, no so much other people. Millions of Americans jumped to all of the wrong conclusions in this case, based on their prejudices against rich, white jocks.
The point of the article I posted was that among the so-called group of 88 professors (who came about as close to lynching those boys as possible without actually going to Walmart for the rope) the worst offenders have not suffered personally or professionally because of their misbehavior, far from it. They have been promoted and advanced at Duke or they've gone on to bigger and better things elsewhere. And that can only be as a result of political correctness. Stretch your imagination and try to imagine three black athletes similarly wrongfully accused. And try to imagine the professional futures of white professors who weren't concerned about protecting the athletes' presumption of innocence, who called them animals, who insulted their mothers in the most disgusting way and who showed no interest whatsoever in the facts of the case. And once determined to have been 100% wrong, refused to issue even the most cursory apology. Ya think they'd be looking at promotions and advancement?
Last edited: