Re: Nice Planet 5: Insert Catchy Title Here
All of the collateral damage from the shut down is tied to your peeps in congress.
While it's terrible that these veterans are being disrespected, this isn't even in the top 100 of bad things happening because of the GOP's shut down.
Keep posting articles though. I'm sure we'll start supporting the vaginal ultrasound party if only you post one more article about a veteran denied access to a monument, never mind the thousands of disabled veterans who are having their benefits and care delayed thanks to the vaginal ultrasound party's shut down.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/10/09/backlog-of-va-disability-claims-grows-amid-shutdown/
Hypocrite
Stinky, who knew you were a "pro choice" monomaniac? And that you somehow think it's relevant here? Just curious, are you taking one of those vocabulary self-help courses where you get extra credit every time you can work "vaginal ultrasound" into the conversation, whether it makes sense or not?
I'll overlook the fact you've voted twice in my poll to see if any ladies of the chorale have the character to criticize or object to anything Neville does. Personally, if a bunch of illegals and their congressional panderers want to get together on the Mall, they can knock themselves out (although I would hope they'd clean up after themselves). I would just like the same courtesy extended to elderly vets. You apparently don't.
As I've explained, and you well know, this mean-spirited, legally unnecessary hassling of veterans is voluntary. Republicans have zip to do with it. Having armed uniformed goons (SEIU, anyone?) literally and figuratively pushing elderly vets around may not register on your obviously corroded equipment, but it does for millions of Americans. And that's what's got you concerned, isn't it? Optics. Winning.
This whole business is silly, and beneath the dignity of a great nation. And I'm speaking of both sides. Notwithstanding, this nonsense of closing open air facilities is entirely on Neville and hasn't occurred in previous "shutdowns." And no amount of spin or misdirection or moral equivalency can change that fact. You're evidently okay with it. Or at least okay enough you won't criticize the person responsible.
You point out that there are other people suffering because of the "shutdown." That's true. But how does it make the disrespectful treatment of these vets acceptable? So you've voted twice in my poll. And both times the answer has been "no." There's nothing Neville can do that will cause you to utter a peep of protest or disagreement. Baghdad Bob's got nothin' on you, pal.
Not that it matters, but if you're going to draw conclusions from the articles you post, you should probably do so accurately. The delivery of medical services by the VA and its clinics is
not being affected by this "shutdown." So no care is being "delayed." But processing those claims and issuing the checks to vets is very important. And one of the principal reasons, IMO, this should and will be ended soon. You probably just made an honest mistake. But when Neville claimed clinics would be "closed," it was more likely a lie. Not to worry, you wouldn't criticize that, either, would you?