Who are the ten that are better? I can see maybe 5 or 6 right off, but after that, it's a pool of mediocrity, which Cousins is right in the middle of.
I would put Stafford and below roughly on par with Cousins.
Maybe better, maybe not. They're all in that middle area, interchangeable.
I read that and thought Jones at NE.Cousins at MN had to deal with for the first few years a revolving door at OC, a completely horsecrap OL for the first 3 or 4 years at least (and now it's at best serviceable), and over the past 3-4 years a defense that ranged from ok to terrible. Not to mention some godawful special teams.
The team won 13 games 2 years ago including a record (8? 9?) come from behind wins which previously was considered a sore spot. Then suddenly the argument filpped to, "if he was better they wouldn't always have to come from behind". The year before they lost 4 or 5 games because the defense couldn't hold a late 4th quarter lead. He had faults but this has been a very poorly run org for several years running.
Cousins at MN had to deal with for the first few years a revolving door at OC, a completely horsecrap OL for the first 3 or 4 years at least (and now it's at best serviceable), and over the past 3-4 years a defense that ranged from ok to terrible. Not to mention some godawful special teams.
The team won 13 games 2 years ago including a record (8? 9?) come from behind wins which previously was considered a sore spot. Then suddenly the argument filpped to, "if he was better they wouldn't always have to come from behind". The year before they lost 4 or 5 games because the defense couldn't hold a late 4th quarter lead. He had faults but this has been a very poorly run org for several years running.
I read that and thought Jones at NE.
If you only count the guarantees in Kirk Cousins' new contract, he's now made $3M less than Tom Brady in lifetime earnings.
I know Brady took a lot of team-friendly deals, but that's just a ridiculous fact.
cF[Authentic said:;n3867433]Sure winning is nice, but it's already so difficult to win the Super Bowl. Take the money, even if it handicaps the team. His career could end on the first play next year - might as well get as much money as possible while he still can.
As fans, our priority is the team. As a player, the priority should be about themselves and getting money before the game destroys their bodies.
Brady didn't need the money - he had Buncheon Bucks. Even half her net worth might be more than he ever made in NFL salary.
cF[Authentic said:;n3867433]Sure winning is nice, but it's already so difficult to win the Super Bowl. Take the money, even if it handicaps the team. His career could end on the first play next year - might as well get as much money as possible while he still can.
As fans, our priority is the team. As a player, the priority should be about themselves and getting money before the game destroys their bodies.
It is about the money for many of these players, not the wins.
And we should not fault them for that- this is their how they live. Having met performers that got hurt and their career is in jeopardy- the performers do need to think of their well being, too.
cF[Authentic said:;n3867433]Sure winning is nice, but it's already so difficult to win the Super Bowl. Take the money, even if it handicaps the team. His career could end on the first play next year - might as well get as much money as possible while he still can.
As fans, our priority is the team. As a player, the priority should be about themselves and getting money before the game destroys their bodies.
I will never fault a person for trying to extract as much money as possible from billionaires.