JDUBBS1280
MN Hockey Enthusiast
There is no whoosh. You're just wrong.
Whooooooooooooooosh!!!!
There is no whoosh. You're just wrong.
Whooooooooooooooosh!!!!
Last word. Oh, and Minnesota, for all its history, doesn't have the most NCAA titles. Sounds like a history of underachieving to me. There, last word.
Solo - Answer this, then we can talk about whether UW is worthy of playing UMN.
It's not valid when Minnesota's hockey legacy is less than that of Wisconsin's, again, in case you are stupid, 6 NCAA Titles > 5 NCAA Titles.
Should I stop being a Vikings fan because of all their choke jobs?
Once again.... Whooooooosh!!!
Yes. For our sanity, we all should.
That said I will argue against this. 6 is greater than 5, but UM has nothing to hide and should be right there regarding legacy. UW fans deserve their pride and so too UM fans.
and yet, wisconsin is still the only school to have it's ncaa runner up banner taken away for cheating.
I don't follow you, are you talking about 1992? there wasn't any cheating there if so, there was just whole lot of childish bs from the Wisconsin players and coaching staff in regard to some really, really embarrassing officiating.
Actually, I believe there was an academically ineligible player or two or something like that.
I don't remember a runner's up banner though. Who the frick cares about being runner's up?
Maybe Minny has 6 of those banners up?
if so, 6 runner-up banners would>3 runner-up banners for UW, the only stat that matters to rat fans named jbubbs?
I'd have to say that for the last 30 plus years, there is no question that Wisconsin has been the more feared and respected program from a Sioux fan perspective. If I were a gopher fan badly in need of some kind of self-validation, I would dwell on old history too, because without that UMinn is just another good program. When the only thing Gopher hockey has left to boast about is that they're the gophers, it just looks like they have been left behind and don't quite know how to deal with it.
I'd have to say that for the last 30 plus years, there is no question that Wisconsin has been the more feared and respected program from a Sioux fan perspective. If I were a gopher fan badly in need of some kind of self-validation, I would dwell on old history too, because without that UMinn is just another good program. When the only thing Gopher hockey has left to boast about is that they're the gophers, it just looks like they have been left behind and don't quite know how to deal with it.
Let me repost my point again, and bolden the part that people are choosing to ignore.
In a world where UW is too good to play SCSU, Mankato, and Bemidji (per UW fans) then the Gophers are derfinitely too good to play the Badgers.
I'll just keep posting this until people stop ignoring the key piece to this whole discussion.
No one cares.
Based on what, exactly? They have two WCHA regular season crowns going back to the '81-'82 season; they have six play-off titles. Lastly, they have three NT's and two runner-ups in that span.I'd have to say that for the last 30 plus years, there is no question that Wisconsin has been the more feared and respected program from a Sioux fan perspective.
Last word. Oh, and Minnesota, for all its history, doesn't have the most NCAA titles. Sounds like a history of underachieving to me. There, last word.