What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

All I will say is that if the coaching staff has determined the attitude/mentality of the kid doesn't align with the program, who is in it, and how it is run...then thank god they figured that out before Walters was here on campus (for both parties).

I'm not going to go on and on with this, but I disagree with the reasons for the decision. Mike Guentzel never had any major problems with Walters, the fans voted him as a favorite, he was the USHL All Star MVP, a top goal scorer and a fairly gritty player to boot. A verbal agitiator? How different is that than Cepis or other Gopher players of old that played hard, gritty, in your face hockey and won games and championships. This coaching staff never ceases to amaze me.
 
Last edited:
I'm not going to on and on with this, I disagree with the reasons for the decision. Mike Guentzel never had any major problems with Walters, the fans voted him as a favorite, he was the USHL All Star MVP, a top goal scorer and a fairly gritty player to boot. A verbal agitiator? How different is that than Cepis or other Gopher players of old that played hard, gritty, in your face hockey and won games and championships. This coaching staff never ceases to amaze me.

Did you read Handyman's last post?
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

I'm not going to go on and on with this, but I disagree with the reasons for the decision. Mike Guentzel never had any major problems with Walters, the fans voted him as a favorite, he was the USHL All Star MVP, a top goal scorer and a fairly gritty player to boot. A verbal agitiator? How different is that than Cepis or other Gopher players of old that played hard, gritty, in your face hockey and won games and championships. This coaching staff never ceases to amaze me.

Walters 21 goals 40 assists
Serratore 17 goals 15 assists

Walters is such a goal scorer and Serratore is not that he only has 4 more?

Let's just stop with the goal scoring angle. And if we've learned anything about USHL goal scorers it is absolutely NO INDICATION of success at same in the WCHA. None, zippo, nada.
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

Did you read Handyman's last post?

I did. Realistically, I think there's speculation on both sides of the issue. But Walters was recruited in 2007 and told last season he would be a 2010, then the coaching staff recants. That's over recruiting and bad decision making. Moreover, if the public disclosure of the reasons for the decision are not completely valid is that ethical? If I'm in the Walters family I don't think so.

I'm obviously a Walters fan and I hope he gets his shot at the WCHA.

Walters 21 goals 40 assists
Serratore 17 goals 15 assists

Walters is such a goal scorer and Serratore is not that he only has 4 more?

Let's just stop with the goal scoring angle. And if we've learned anything about USHL goal scorers it is absolutely NO INDICATION of success at same in the WCHA. None, zippo, nada.

I'll take the 21-40-61 any day and work with the player to develop that in the WCHA. Regardless of last season's outcome, numbers are without a doubt one of the criteria that coaches base their decisions on for USHL players.
 
Last edited:
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

So you ignore the fact that AT LEAST 3-4 current Gophers have varying levels of dislike for the kid and a player that they were recruiting went somewhere else because he and Walters had a beef? That is all fine and dandy because you are a fan of his and he put up a bunch of points?

BTW there was no misrepresentation about anything...as I said on GPL I find it rather hard to believe that I knew he was most likely going to play another year in the USHL and he and his daddy didn't. Maybe now he can finally join the WHL like he was hinting at when he committed and then he can disappear there like he will in the WCHA.

I would rather have the lower scoring player who doesnt cause issues and doesnt have Jimmy O'Brien syndrome...if you wouldnt fine. I hope I dont see you decrying the teams chemistry next season because you seem to not think that is important at all.
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

So you ignore the fact that AT LEAST 3-4 current Gophers have varying levels of dislike for the kid and a player that they were recruiting went somewhere else because he and Walters had a beef? That is all fine and dandy because you are a fan of his and he put up a bunch of points?

Is it 3 or 4?:D Where did you get this information? How valid is it? I'd like to see the information on this small sample qualitative research you've done. Until then it's just your opinion. Do you have any evidence to refute the validity of the following source document?:

Minnesota met with Walters on Friday and told him not only was he going back to the USHL for another season but they wanted him to change his style of play. They wanted him to stop being "chirpy" and an agitator and more of a pure scorer. The source told me that he was willing to change his game for the coaches, "but it was like they were just coming up with one more thing because he met all the goals maybe they thought he wouldn't."

When asked if high school players that were brought in early affected his decision Walters said, "I'm happy that those guys are Gophers, they are my friends and they deserve everything they have been given."

The source I talked to this afternoon talked about the Gophers recruiting strategies, telling me that not one of the Gopher coaches called Ryan to congratulate him on being a USHL All-Star or for the season that he had. The source also said, "Minnesota was at several games at the end of the season but not once did they stay after to say hi while other schools were talking to their guys." Retrieved from http://noalibisnoregrets.blogspot.com/2010/04/ryan-walters-de-commits-from-minnesota.html

No one seems to have a problem with "Papa Chirp" as "chirpy" and an agitator:

"He likes to talk -- to everyone," said junior defenseman Kevin Wehrs, a USHL teammate of Cepis' for two seasons at Cedar Rapids, Iowa. "It is part of his personality, and he does like to stir things up. He is good at that.

"He draws a lot of penalties, especially with his mouth. He likes to get under [someone's] skin. He doesn't leave them alone. He is like your little brother. Sooner or later you are going to snap at him." At Cedar Rapids, Wehrs said half of Cepis' teammates wanted to fight him after practice. "But then, after the day, they were best buddies with him," Wehrs said. Retrieved from http://www.startribune.com/sports/gophers/80486582.html?page=1&c=y

Lastly I'd like to comment on the style and substance of your remarks to me personally. It's seems childish and presumptuous of you to assume that it's all "fine and dandy" with me until you've interacted with me on the validity of your research and I've given you my assessment. However, by the looks of your ego defense mechanisms, I have my doubts whether you even want it anyway.

BTW there was no misrepresentation about anything...as I said on GPL I find it rather hard to believe that I knew he was most likely going to play another year in the USHL and he and his daddy didn't. Maybe now he can finally join the WHL like he was hinting at when he committed and then he can disappear there like he will in the WCHA.

You stated previously, "Second, that isnt the reason he isnt coming that is just what is said publically". If that is true, it is an unethical misrepresentation or concealment with reference to the reported fact with knowledge of its falsity or in reckless disregard of its truth. However, you seem to be confused, as your statements above seem to indicate that the coaches assessment of Walters is true.

Did it ever occur to you that the Walters family had a different perspective than yours and most likely more accurate? Moreover, the condescending and arrogant manner in which maliciously project a dismal hockey career for an 18 year old hockey player with visions and dreams, ironically tells me a little bit about your own lack of character. You might want to work on that because it's pathetic and reflects a level of immaturity.

I would rather have the lower scoring player who doesnt cause issues and doesnt have Jimmy O'Brien syndrome...if you wouldnt fine. I hope I dont see you decrying the teams chemistry next season because you seem to not think that is important at all.

You have the same right to self-determination as I have. Once again you are being presumptuous regarding my understanding of whether team chemistry is important or not. I ask you once again not to make any assumptions in response to my posts unless you have taken sufficient time to get to know my opinion on it.

Personally I don't see Ryan Walters as a loose cannon. He consulted with his father and family as a first level of accountability, discussed his options and gave no indication in the blog article that he was insubordinate or cocky in his response to what was obviously disappointing news. By the way, assuming Walters may be a problem in the future without sufficient evidence is a post hoc fallacy.

In summary, I think the Gophers lost a very good recruit here who has a lot of offensive and defensive potential. The tragic part of it is he waited three years to play, excelled at his position as instructed by the Gopher coaching staff and was led to believe he was coming in next season.

Furthermore, if the source document above is correct in explaining the lack of concern and communication by the Gopher coaching staff towards Ryan Walters in the past, it does not reflect the kind of sensitive professionalism that is a required of good recruiting strategies and coaching at the University of Minnesota.
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

First of all, let me just say that I come into this thread only with the intentions of good discussion on this Walters topic. My name has been dragged through the mud by certain people and I'm disappointed by their comments but that is their opinion. I have a few comments on Walters and I'd like to discuss this in an orderly manner because I know that you guys have some good posters here.

First of all, let me point out that I think that Walters will be a nice recruit for someone. He's obviously a kid who can put points on the board and every team in the WCHA needs that. I'll also point out that you guys have a very nice class coming in this season.

The thing that keeps getting brought up about Walters is his character. I've heard numerous times that Walters doesn't get along with players on the team and that Lucia didn't bring him in for this reason.

I feel that this is the biggest crock of .... that I have ever heard in my entire life. If you can find me a college hockey team, or a hockey team in general that every single player gets along with every teammate and I can almost guarantee you that it will be the first. Same thing with his dad. I can promise you that every college team in the country has multiple over zealous fathers out there who are too involved with their sons development. It's not like Ryan Walters is the first kid to be labeled in this regard, and it's not like he will be the last.

If Walters wasn't brought in this season because of his relationships with current players on the team, then he never would be brought in. They would have pulled his offer, but they didn't, they just delayed him a year. I do not buy for one second the theory that Lucia isn't bringing him in because this season may be his last. What happens when Lucia doesn't get fired and Walters comes in next season? Is his attitude going to change? Is he all of a sudden going to get along better with those kids on the team that supposedly hate him? If Lucia really didn't want him on the team because of his cancerous attributes then he would have pulled the offer and he didn't do that.

The fact remains that the Gophers return 11 forwards from last seasons roster and bring in Condon, Haula, Bjugstad, Ambroz, Larson, and Serratore. And that is not including Jake Youso who was recruited for 2009, Max Gardiner, Christian Isackson, and the aformentioned Ryan Walters.

People say that the Gophers didn't over-recruit this season and that's not why Ryan Walters de-committed. Whatever, that's fine...but the fact remains, if Ryan Walters was brought in for 2010, he would still be committed to Minnesota.

I don't know about you guys, but my program can't afford to lose 60+ point USHL performers at the age of 18. Maybe you guys can.
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

Chuck,

I shouldn't mention hearsay but I don't think you have the full picture. I'm no justifying or excusing anything but like I said below there is more here than meets the eye. That doesn't excuse it one bit and this is yet another thing that will go in the check mark against Lucia if they don't start winning.

Funny how winning solves everything isn't it? What if after some of Eaves issues the Badgers had gone on a 3 year run like the Gophers have? Well, he'd be in the same boat right now I would think.

Anyway, as a Gopher fan I hope this thing goes away after a while. For now the drama glass will stay at near full capacity. :o
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

Chuck,

I shouldn't mention hearsay but I don't think you have the full picture. I'm no justifying or excusing anything but like I said below there is more here than meets the eye. That doesn't excuse it one bit and this is yet another thing that will go in the check mark against Lucia if they don't start winning.

Funny how winning solves everything isn't it? What if after some of Eaves issues the Badgers had gone on a 3 year run like the Gophers have? Well, he'd be in the same boat right now I would think.

Anyway, as a Gopher fan I hope this thing goes away after a while. For now the drama glass will stay at near full capacity. :o

Winning cures all, that is for sure.
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

People say that the Gophers didn't over-recruit this season and that's not why Ryan Walters de-committed. Whatever, that's fine...but the fact remains, if Ryan Walters was brought in for 2010, he would still be committed to Minnesota.

IMO, the Gophers didn't over recruit they just continued to recruit for a different type of need that Walters wasn't going to be. This club has many holes but a big need need is players who will grind it out on the boards and take body shots from opposing defensemen in front of the net. Last year they continued to show me players who were unwilling to do just that.
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

IMO, the Gophers didn't over recruit they just continued to recruit for a different type of need that Walters wasn't going to be. This club has many holes but a big need need is players who will grind it out on the boards and take body shots from opposing defensemen in front of the net. Last year they continued to show me players who were unwilling to do just that.

I'm not sure recruiting walk on's who will be the 17th and 18th forwards on a roster when you can only suit up 12 is really going to fill that hole this season do you?

lol by the way, the "They didn't over-recruit, they just continued to recruit" line literally had me laughing out loud.
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

I'm not sure recruiting walk on's who will be the 17th and 18th forwards on a roster when you can only suit up 12 is really going to fill that hole this season do you?

lol by the way, the "They didn't over-recruit, they just continued to recruit" line literally had me laughing out loud.
It will be interesting to see how the competition for playing time shakes out. There's a few prima donnas that should have been benched for their lack of effort the last couple of years but there was no one waiting in the wings to take their spot.

I don't think anyone "over" recruits. Again there is more here than meets the eye. They most certainly wanted a larger roster this year. They also before the year started probably thought they'd lose more than they actually did. Schroeder the only one who's left so far and Barriball essentially filling that spot is a unique situation for this team.
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

It will be interesting to see how the competition for playing time shakes out. There's a few prima donnas that should have been benched for their lack of effort the last couple of years but there was no one waiting in the wings to take their spot.

I don't think anyone "over" recruits. Again there is more here than meets the eye. They most certainly wanted a larger roster this year. They also before the year started probably thought they'd lose more than they actually did. Schroeder the only one who's left so far and Barriball essentially filling that spot is a unique situation for this team.

This "more than meets the eye" thing is interesting to me. I understand you're not trying to throw anyone under the bus and that is admirable. But at this point, Walters name has been drug through the mud pretty far.

Everyone knows that he's got personality conflicts with a few players on the current team, it's been made well aware that he had issues on a trip with Team USA, over-zealous father, etc. But playing coy on this "more than meets the eye" thing almost makes him look worse than actually saying what you're talking about.

People are making it seem like he turns into a werewolf when it gets dark or something with this "more than meets the eye."
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

People are making it seem like he turns into a werewolf when it gets dark or something with this "more than meets the eye."

So you're saying Walters is a Transformer? I didn't even know there were robot werewolves.
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

I feel bad for this kid, but as any serious hockey family knows, nothing is certain until you sign on the dotted line. In any recruiting situation where you have a player verbally committed for a long time, there are bound to be changes in both the player and the program. Sometimes, those changes force teams to part with prospects, and that is part of hockey recruiting, and that's why both sides always need options.

If Minnesota's coaching staff believes that they would be better served by not bringing in a committed player at a point in time, they probably have a very good reason for making that decision. They probably believe that other options will give them a better chance to create the kind of team and performance dynamic they are seeking. Lucia and his staff, despite a rough stretch of late, have won national titles and recruited well so they probably deserve the benefit of the doubt.

That said, if you over-recruit and park kids in juniors that are clearly ready for college hockey, it's not good for a program's reputation, either.

It's a very fine balance...
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

This "more than meets the eye" thing is interesting to me. I understand you're not trying to throw anyone under the bus and that is admirable. But at this point, Walters name has been drug through the mud pretty far.

Everyone knows that he's got personality conflicts with a few players on the current team, it's been made well aware that he had issues on a trip with Team USA, over-zealous father, etc. But playing coy on this "more than meets the eye" thing almost makes him look worse than actually saying what you're talking about.

People are making it seem like he turns into a werewolf when it gets dark or something with this "more than meets the eye."

I was afraid I'd stick myself into a corner. Probably should have let it go. I will say that I never understood the negativity towards Walters. I think he's done what he needed to do and things just didn't work out. I don't blame him for wanting to play now rather than later and I wish him the best.
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

I have no inside information, but I think this situation really stinks. It's a real black eye for college hockey.

College coaches need to be held accountable when they promise a kid a spot for a certain year and then reneg on that commitment. They have to hold themselves to a higher standard. Right now, aside from reputational risk, college coaches have no skin in this decision. Meanwhile, kids are left dangling in the wind. Mike Eaves, Don Lucia...who is going to be next?

College coaches don't have control of everything (red shirts from injuries, kid staying an extra year, etc), but you know what, so what! If there are potential issues, be upfront about them. Hey Ryan - you are going to be here in 2010, but if X or Y happens, then we are going to have to re-evaluate. The problem is that college coaches don't do that because they fear they may lose recruits to competitors. You can't play both sides of the coin and expect to come away unscathed.

Again, I have no information on what as specifically communicated to Ryan Walters prior to his commitment, but as an outsider, this looks bad for Don Lucia, the University of Minnesota, and college hockey as a whole.
 
Last edited:
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

I know only what I have read here and elsewhere about the Walter’s issue. I see people attacking Lucia for the way things have transpired, and attacking people who defend Lucia. However, in the case of some apparent Lucia defenders, the message isn’t necessarily that “Lucia did the correct thing” as many are being attacked for, but rather a message that most of the people attacking Lucia are basing those attacks primarily on one side of the story. I tend to agree with this opinion.

I have been in the position where an opponent to a project I was leading, rather than have a face-to-face to work through the issue, went out essentially recruiting opponents by only telling select details about the project that suited his “side”. In some cases, these people began to question or even oppose the project until I heard about it and was able to explain my side to them. In a few cases, these people were so convinced (and I wasn’t aware of them until later) that they weren’t interested in hearing my side and chose to only believe the first thing they heard. In one case though, a person contacted me directly to “hear my side of the story”. He stated he knew there were always two sides and made an effort to hear both sides before concluding anything. My explanations quickly alleviated any of his concerns. He was the only one of many who did this, and I took this as a learning opportunity to not jump to conclusions based on one person’s view, especially if that person has a reason to bias their ‘facts’. (Same idea journalists espouse, but rarely seem to follow through on.)

In the case of Walter’s, it appears many of the “facts” people are quoting are based on correspondence with the father (a person who could have several reasons to offer a biased, onesided viewpoint).

Most people haven’t seen the players in question play more than a couple times, or maybe never. People have been critical of the staff getting players whose personality doesn’t mesh in the past (even though it would be difficult to really know when recruiting players at such a young age with limited recruiting visits). (‘Coaches should have been able to tell Lofquist was a risky personality and never brought him in’ was the sentiment of some.) Yet now some seem to imply scoring is more important. They have been critical of choosing scorers over grinders who might stay for 4 years, but now scoring is imperative. They are critical of the number of recruits (apparently forgetting how many people have left early in the past and how many could reasonably have been expected to leave this year). They make assumptions that everything is the coaches fault, or an individual player’s fault, depending on the issue, judging the way a situation has been reported to have been handled (biased?) even though both are making decisions based on the way the NCAA is set up and how the NHL has chosen to operate.

I realize this is a message board, and opinions and speculation are more important than facts. I just see this particular issue as one that maybe should be viewed more cautiously. I liked Swami’s post about putting some trust in the staff to make a good decision with “all the information” they have at hand to put together the best team. And as others have said, the test will be whether next season is a good one or not.

On second thought, no one has actually read this far, so go ahead and speculate and rip on each other! We have to have something to talk about, after all. Besides, I am the only one whose posts Lucia reads for guidance.
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

Koho - No coach should offer any player (regardless of ability) a scholarship unless the whole package has been vetted - personality, fit, hockey ability, value of a college education, etc.

The question I ask all of you is why should a kid bear 100% of the risk related to a coach's inability to steer the ship?
 
Re: MN Golden Gopher 2010 Offseason Thread

Koho - No coach should offer any player (regardless of ability) a scholarship unless the whole package has been vetted - personality, fit, hockey ability, value of a college education, etc.

The question I ask all of you is why should a kid bear 100% of the risk related to a coach's inability to steer the ship?
What risk does the player bear prior to signing an LOI? If he gives a verbal, he can change his mind at any time. If a program accepts a verbal, that doesn't bind them to offer a scholarship. Where's the risk?

While I agree a coach/program shouldn't make a habit out of this, it's bound to happen at some point if you're around long enough. Sometimes needs change. If Lucia and Minnesota were doing this on a yearly basis, I agree that criticism is warranted. However, I think this was a unique situation so I think there's only so much blame that should be given.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top