Re: MLB 2014: I paid the $20 mil posting fee for the right to start this thread
I used to think that MLB should be more specific about the criteria, like making pitchers ineligible. And hockey should be more specific about goalies, and football should be more specific about running backs and (especially these days) quarterbacks who are different based on the position they play and the system they play in. But these kinds of discussions have their benefit for the sport involved under the axiom that there’s no such thing as bad controversy. At least the argument is about baseball stuff, not whether the guy juices up or beats his wife and/or children.
The only thing that annoys me is when people fit their theories to benefit players on their teams. Like George King who wouldn’t vote for Pedro Martinez (who had a Kershaw-like year, or maybe more accurately Kershaw had a Pedro-like year) because he was a pitcher, but had previously voted for Yankee pitchers for MVP.
I used to think that MLB should be more specific about the criteria, like making pitchers ineligible. And hockey should be more specific about goalies, and football should be more specific about running backs and (especially these days) quarterbacks who are different based on the position they play and the system they play in. But these kinds of discussions have their benefit for the sport involved under the axiom that there’s no such thing as bad controversy. At least the argument is about baseball stuff, not whether the guy juices up or beats his wife and/or children.
The only thing that annoys me is when people fit their theories to benefit players on their teams. Like George King who wouldn’t vote for Pedro Martinez (who had a Kershaw-like year, or maybe more accurately Kershaw had a Pedro-like year) because he was a pitcher, but had previously voted for Yankee pitchers for MVP.