What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Minnesota Twins 2010: Part II - The Franchise Strikes Back

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Minnesota Twins 2010: Part II - The Franchise Strikes Back

JF_Gophers said:
Depends how they count I guess.

3 on for walk, is 2 LO
3 on for dp is 3 LO
2 on for SO is 2 LO

Leadoff hit in 2nd or 3rd inning, means 3 more LO for the 3 outs.

So yeah I can see that.
Click to expand...

I saw it that way too after I looked at their stats a bit more closely. imho it should be left on base after 3 out...
 
Re: Minnesota Twins 2010: Part II - The Franchise Strikes Back

JF_Gophers said:
Depends how they count I guess.

3 on for walk, is 2 LO
3 on for dp is 3 LO
2 on for SO is 2 LO

Leadoff hit in 2nd or 3rd inning, means 3 more LO for the 3 outs.

So yeah I can see that.
Click to expand...

um... I think you're calculating that wrong. A walk doesn't count for LOB as far as I know... :confused:
 
Re: Minnesota Twins 2010: Part II - The Franchise Strikes Back

dxmnkd316 said:
um... I think you're calculating that wrong. A walk doesn't count for LOB as far as I know... :confused:
Click to expand...

He's referring to the site I was referring to. They (MLB.com) had 11 LOB for the Twins after 3, which was preposterous given how many runners they had at the time. Clearly they were counting any runner on base that didn't score during any plate appearance regardless if it it were the 3rd out of the inning, which goes against the standard accounting.
 
Re: Minnesota Twins 2010: Part II - The Franchise Strikes Back

Slap Shot said:
He's referring to the site I was referring to. They (MLB.com) had 11 LOB for the Twins after 3, which was preposterous given how many runners they had at the time. Clearly they were counting any runner on base that didn't score during any plate appearance regardless if it it were the 3rd out of the inning, which goes against the standard accounting.
Click to expand...

Ahhhh...

As an aside, there are actually two LOB statistics: Team and individual LOB. Both are calculated quite differently.
 
Re: Minnesota Twins 2010: Part II - The Franchise Strikes Back

You heard it here first folks, this Joe Mauer character has a future in baseball. You write this down, you'll see.
 
Re: Minnesota Twins 2010: Part II - The Franchise Strikes Back

Delmon saving a run? WHILE ON DEFENSE?!?! holy crap.
 
Re: Minnesota Twins 2010: Part II - The Franchise Strikes Back

Someone negative repped me for the delmon comment. You people crack me up. "Don't be stupid"
 
Re: Minnesota Twins 2010: Part II - The Franchise Strikes Back

Delmon young sucked serious balls on defense the past few years. Denying it is just sticking your head in the sand.
 
Re: Minnesota Twins 2010: Part II - The Franchise Strikes Back

Jesus with the big two out hit and gets second because the Yankee CFer a moron.
 
Re: Minnesota Twins 2010: Part II - The Franchise Strikes Back

It brings me immense pleasure knowing that yankee fans get to see joe mauer in a twins uniform just pounding the ball. Oh that makes me so ***** happy.
 
Re: Minnesota Twins 2010: Part II - The Franchise Strikes Back

Don't get too happy yet - bases loaded and 1 out for the Yanks. :rolleyes:
 
Re: Minnesota Twins 2010: Part II - The Franchise Strikes Back

A-Rod: 4-6 with 3 HR off Guerrier.

This looks promising. :p

And a grand slam. Surprise, surprise.

Make that 5-7 with 4 HR.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top