College Hockey Weekend
New member
Re: Minnesota State, Mankato, Season Thread
Outside of the RPI series, do we know anything about the Mavs 11-12 schedule?
Outside of the RPI series, do we know anything about the Mavs 11-12 schedule?
Very, very good point here. It's actually so true. He's not a hockey guy. He doesn't understand the potential of what a good D-I hockey program in Minnesota, in the fricken WCHA, could mean for this University and this community.I don't think it's so much "Mr. Nice Guy" as that he just doesn't care about anything but football and basketball.
Outside of the RPI series, do we know anything about the Mavs 11-12 schedule?
I totally agree. We've got a new director of operations who fully took over his first full season last season, and he's implementing a lot more drills and emphasis on hockey skills rather than just "moving kids through the system." He played at MSU. Depth is an issue at our top levels, and with the two school split between East and West, the numbers are directly pointing to 90 percent or more of the kids attending the West side. That's a problem because East's high school team suffers mightily. They played a roster of 14 with no JV this season.Good luck 'ewe! Fingers crossed.
Mav, I think you guys need to build numbers and depth in the youth ranks. One of my kid's buddies is an A player in Edina (was on the state champ PWA team this year). Back when he was a squirt A they faced the Mankato SQA team in the finals of the Edina tourney. Jutting's kid was on that team. They were good, but only had 12 skaters and got worn down by the end. Hopefully programs like the Knights can help build that depth for your association.
Outside of the RPI series, do we know anything about the Mavs 11-12 schedule?
Correct. It'll be interesting to see if the Mavs can defend their christmas tournament title too in Chicago.The WCHA composite schedule was released a few days ago. I also know that Lowell will headed to Mankato in return of the two-game set played at UML this season.
I don't see what the lease at the civic center has to do with being one of the worst-funded programs in D-I. I see what you said above as being evidence that they just don't care about hockey. Fund the athletic department near the top of D-II, but fund the hockey program near the bottom of D-I? That shows that they are unwilling to do what it takes to compete in D-I.Some of the administration has shared with me that MSU has one of the best funded athletic departments in Division II, but is near the bottom in D1 hockey.
I don't see what the lease at the civic center has to do with being one of the worst-funded programs in D-I. I see what you said above as being evidence that they just don't care about hockey. Fund the athletic department near the top of D-II, but fund the hockey program near the bottom of D-I? That shows that they are unwilling to do what it takes to compete in D-I.
Do we know what Troy Jutting is being paid exactly? When is his contract up? I'll look into those details myself here shortly..I think there is more to it than Buisman not caring about hockey. Some of the administration has shared with me that MSU has one of the best funded athletic departments in Division II, but is near the bottom in D1 hockey. Part of the problem is the bad lease agreement that the team has with the city at the civic center. As it was put to me "it's one of the worst in the nation". From what I understand, they felt as though they didn't really have a choice but to sign Jutting to his current 4-year deal. They felt as though they couldn't fire a coach that had just won "Coach of the Year" honors and were bound to a 4-year deal due to MNSCU rules. It was either 4 years or nothing. I'm not saying these are excuses for the putrid performances the last couple years (or most of his tenure for that matter), but those are the realities of the situation.
In all honesty, the cost of a good coach isn't that ridiculously high. When this contract runs out, I fully expect the school to go in a different direction. I wish it could happen sooner, but I just don't think that the school can afford to pay 2 coaches at the same time unless some of the donors step in and say that they will pay for a buyout. Jutting seems to be a good dude, but I think he's hit the wall of how far he can take this program. It is time for a change...unfortunately, it's probably not coming as soon as we would all like to see.
I don't see what the lease at the civic center has to do with being one of the worst-funded programs in D-I. I see what you said above as being evidence that they just don't care about hockey. Fund the athletic department near the top of D-II, but fund the hockey program near the bottom of D-I? That shows that they are unwilling to do what it takes to compete in D-I.
The lease has everything to do with being horribly funded. If they only get (and I don't know what the actual numbers are) 30% of ticket revenues while most schools get 60% of ticket revenues they have to double the amount of dollars that come out of student fees as comprable programs. For even numbers let's assume MSU's ticket revenues are $1,000,000. If they only get 30% ($300,000) of revenue while a comprable school gets 60% ($600,000) that means you have to make up that $300,000 through student fees. Now, if I'm the President of the university and I have the hockey program coming to me and asking for $300,000 more while at the same time making the decision to eliminate 4 other athletic programs, I can't possibly go to the student body and ask them to raise their fees even more. The supply of cash is not bottomless like it is within the U of M athletic department where they can be paying 2 head football coaches, 2 head basketball coaches, etc, etc.
Really it's a chicken or the egg scenario. If they spend more money now, will they win more and make additional revenues? Or do they say, "win more, create more revenue and we'll spend more money". The trick is to find a happy medium between the two to grow revenues, but not bankrupt the school to do it. It sounds like it should be easy, but it's just not.
Here are the base salaries of WCHA coaches at public schools, according to recent reporting by The Denver Post.
1. Mike Eaves, Wisconsin -- $229,511 in 2008-09 (contract through 2013-14)
2. Don Lucia, Minnesota -- $222,789 in 2007-08 (2011-12)
3. Dave Hakstol, North Dakota -- $210,000 in 2007-08 (2011-12)
4. Bob Motzko, St. Cloud State -- $167,000 in 2008-09 ( 2014-15)
5. Troy Jutting, Minnesota State, -- $153,246 in 2009-10 (2012-13)
6. Scott Sandelin, Minnesota-Duluth -- $150,000 in 2009-10 (2011-12)
7. Jamie Russell, Michigan Tech -- $116,759 in 2008-09 (2011-12)
8. Dave Shyiak, Alaska Anchorage -- $110,000 in 2008-09 (2011-12)
Do we know what Troy Jutting is being paid exactly? When is his contract up? I'll look into those details myself here shortly..
It's a combination of both of your points. It's highly clear that hockey is one of the bottom feeding sports among the administration's priority. This is the state of hockey for Christ's sake. Put some effort into getting this program to be competitive. I understand financially things are much different here than other schools, and in addition that the lease down at the Verizon Center hurts profits that the program could attain, but still. The fact that we have so much potential to try and improve this program and figure our **** out. If we don't soon, it won't be long til the last 5 years of Tech Hockey, no offense Husky fans, becomes the next 5 years of Mavericks hockey, or maybe even more.
Clearly the arena thing will continue to be an issue financially, as it is for most programs that don't have on campus arenas or arenas in which they own. The thing is, they've gotta put the money into the program if they ever want it to make them money. How do you increase season ticket holders? How do you increase the support of Alumni and donors? It's simple, you put a product on the ice that can be competitive and that will generate fan support. If we could get a team that's highly competitive in the WCHA for a couple years, look what could happen to the program! We started getting competitive back in 01-03, and the seats started filling up week in and week out.
I just get so frustrated with seeing a program stalled in the dumps when there is potential to be much better. I don't expect us to be like North Dakota, etc. I just want us to have a good shot at the WCHA every year, and then a NCAA tourney birth as well.
I've had season tickets for eleven years now. Coincidentally, those are the Jutting years. As of now, I don't intend to renew my tickets for the 11-12 season. I don't see any sign of improvement on the horizon, no matter how hard I squint, and I'm just not willing to continue to reward it with my money.How do you increase season ticket holders?
which as fans, shouldn't we at least be able to expect this from a university's athletic department? can't we, as fans, who spend money on tickets, apparel, etc, spend our time cheering these guys on, etc expect to at least see some effort from the people in charge to try and help put a competitive team on the ice? it's a ****ing joke, and it makes many of the loyal Mavs fans quite angry. what I don't understand is, why don't the fans have any kind of say in this? there's obvious discontent with Jutting and the product he puts on the ice each year..we can't even make a final five for God's sake.I don't disagree with your points at all. I became a season ticket holder after the 2007-2008 season and saw first hand what winning did for ticket admissions. I was also there this year when the "Fire Jutting" chants got going in earnest. It's not a pretty site right now and it's not a bright looking future at this point. I just want to see us making the NCAA tourney from time to time, having home ice in the playoffs, and making the Final Five from on a regular basis. The results we're seeing right now should not be acceptable for anyone. Given the circumstances, we should at the very least be competitive.
I've thought about it, but I just couldn't do it. My dad and I have had the same seats since the D-II era, and I just don't think I could get through a winter without the Mavs.I've had season tickets for eleven years now. Coincidentally, those are the Jutting years. As of now, I don't intend to re-new my tickets for the 11-12 season. I don't see any sign of improvement on the horizon, no matter how hard I squint, and I'm just not willing to continue to reward it with my money.
which as fans, shouldn't we at least be able to expect this from a university's athletic department? can't we, as fans, who spend money on tickets, apparel, etc, spend our time cheering these guys on, etc expect to at least see some effort from the people in charge to try and help put a competitive team on the ice? it's a ****ing joke, and it makes many of the loyal Mavs fans quite angry. what I don't understand is, why don't the fans have any kind of say in this? there's obvious discontent with Jutting and the product he puts on the ice each year..we can't even make a final five for God's sake.
This upcoming season could be one year that as fans, we have to sacrifice watching a terrible team on the ice to get to a point in the WCHA where we can actually be competitive in making the final five and then NCAA tournament. (Thus, firing Jutting and looking for a a better coach elsewhere.)The simple answer is that the largest donors to the program have a personal connection with Jutting (so I hear) and have influenced the school in keeping him and he's had very timely good seasons. It seems as though every time his contract comes up for renewal he has a "good season". The last one was 07-08 and the playoff series against the Gophers. If memory serves correctly, before that it was just 2 years removed from the NCAA tourney run and he had his "big" recruiting class that just graduated last year. I get the feeling though, that his luck is running out. The Blue Line Club shrunk last year. I have a feeling it will shrink again this year. Students aren't showing up. Walk up tickets sales are plummeting. Other Minnesota schools are trending upwards. We finished behind both the new teams to the conference that we were supposed to be superior to. There will be no Gopher/Sioux series to cover up the dismal attendance. Unless the team unexpectedly improves and goes on a streak, it seems like the future of this program is coming to a turning point.
Unfortunately, fewer and fewer people care each year.