What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Miac 2011-2012

Re: Miac 2011-2012

eg1351 said:
This weekends Games:


(my predictions in bold)

Concordia (WI) @ GAC (After seeing the Marian/Cord score I am betting this game will be won by a touchdown)
Finlandia @ St. Kates (Pretty much a brand new St. Kate's team. Not exactly a test, but will probably be closer than MIAC fans want it to be)
St. Norberts @ St. Mary's (SNC won't surprise anyone this year, but they should still handle most MIAC teams)
Robert Morris @ Concordia (MN) (Robert Morris is a decent club team but they don't compare to most of the MIAC)
Lindenwood @ St. Ben's (Sorry Bennies.)
St. Norberts @ GAC (This is the MIAC game I am most looking forward to this weekend. I am betting on a one-goal game.)
Finlandia @ St. Ben's (You're welcome Bennies.)
Concordia (WI) @ St. Marys (SMU will be too much to handle for a Concordia team that will be banged up from the stomping GAC will give them)
Royal Military @ Concordia (MN) - (ditto above)
Lindenwood @ St. Kates (hate to say it but until St. Kate's proves it, I find it tough to bet on them.)
Bethel @ St. Olaf (One Word: Newstrom.)
Click to expand...


I got 7 of 11. Not too bad. Norberts let me down against SMU. St. Kate's surprised against Lindenwood. Good weekend of hockey. MIAC conference play starts next week! I'll get my predictions in soon.
 
Re: Miac 2011-2012

This Weekend's Matchups


St. Thomas vs. St. Ben's - Tommies sweep
GAC vs. Bethel - GAC 3 points
St. Olaf @ Concordia - Split - Olaf loses first game (blame it on travelling)
Augsburg vs. St. Kate's St. Kate's sweeps (gaining more hope after a decent showing against Lindenwood
Hamline vs. St. Mary's St. Mary's sweeps
 
Re: Miac 2011-2012

St. Thomas vs. St Bens- St Thomas sweeps
Gustavus vs. Bethel- GAC sweep (rumor is Newstrom has mono)
St. Olaf @ Concordia- Concordia sweeps
Augsburg vs. St Kates- St Kate sweeps
Hamline vs. St Mary's- Split
 
Re: Miac 2011-2012

St. Thomas vs. St Bens - St Thomas sweeps
Gustavus vs. Bethel - GAC sweep
St. Olaf @ Concordia - Split
Augsburg vs. St Kates - St Kate's sweep
Hamline vs. St Mary's - St. Mary's gets 3 points
 
Re: Miac 2011-2012

Not good for Bethel if that's true. Everyone in the league is wishing they could be playing Bethel over the next two weekends! Lucky for GAC and CM.
 
Re: Miac 2011-2012

I must read..Poor Lindenwood may need a glass of WINE. On their web sight this is what they wrote .

Caitlyn Post recorded the first hat trick for the Lindenwood women's hockey team, but a rash of penalties led to the Lady Lions falling to St. Catherine by a 7-6 score on Saturday afternoon in St. Cloud, Minn.

Lindenwood jumped out to a 6-2 lead against the Wildcats late in the second period. Post scored three of Lindenwood's goals, and other tallies came from Samantha Moore, Sydney Gorzitza, and Kendra Ganchar. Alison Wickenheiser had four assists, and Alyssa West and Samantha Redick each had two assists.

After Lindenwood went up by four goals, the team had trouble staying out of the penalty box. The Lady Lions allowed three power-play goals in the final five minutes of the second period, and St. Catherine tied the game with another power-play goal in the first part of the third period. St. Catherine then scored the game-winner at the 9:12 mark of the final period.

For the game, Lindenwood dominated play. The Lady Lions were called for 16 penalties though, compared to just four against St. Catherine.



I wrote:

They dominated St. Kates out shooting them 34 to 33 lol. I thought penalties were part of the game. Maybe next time they wont have to trip and hold the speedy wildcat team. For a division 1 team they need to grow up before they play some real D1 teams that will kick their but.
 
Re: Miac 2011-2012

westeast said:
I wrote:

They dominated St. Kates out shooting them 34 to 33 lol. I thought penalties were part of the game. Maybe next time they wont have to trip and hold the speedy wildcat team. For a division 1 team they need to grow up before they play some real D1 teams that will kick their but.
Click to expand...


Like This??

Fri Sep 23 at Wisconsin NC 0-11 L Box 0- 1- 0 0- 0- 0
Sun Sep 25 at Wisconsin NC 0-13 L Box 0- 2- 0 0- 0- 0
Fri Oct 28 MERCYHURST NC 0- 7 L Box 0- 9- 0 0- 0- 0
Sat Oct 29 MERCYHURST NC 1-14 L Box 0-10- 0 0- 0- 0
Click to expand...

Did Lindenwood and St Bens play??
 
Re: Miac 2011-2012

OK EG I will see if I can do better than your pics last week and yours were good.

St. Thomas vs. St. Ben's - Tommies sweep with flying colors
GAC vs. Bethel - Split
St. Olaf @ Concordia - Split - Olaf sweeps
Augsburg vs. St. Kate's St. Kate's sweeps young fast team with good Vets
Hamline vs. St. Mary's Sweep for St. Marys

So lets see how many points we get. I say we start now with conference play 2 pts win 1 pt tie and see where we end up at the end .

I can keep a record and post it for anyone that is going to do this.

But let me know if you will be doing this every week..

Thanks
 
Re: Miac 2011-2012

St. Thomas vs. St Bens - St Thomas sweeps
Gustavus vs. Bethel - GAC sweep
St. Olaf @ Concordia - Concordia sweep
Augsburg vs. St Kates - St Kate's sweep
Hamline vs. St Mary's - Split
 
Re: Miac 2011-2012

westeast said:
So lets see how many points we get. I say we start now with conference play 2 pts win 1 pt tie and see where we end up at the end .

I can keep a record and post it for anyone that is going to do this.
Thanks
Click to expand...

This sounds fun, but the scoring system doesn't quite make sense. I would say one point per right game prediction (e.g. Gac Sweep predicted, GAC sweep = 2 points; GAC loses/ties one= one point, GAC loses both/ties both = 0 points). So a tie would have to be predicted to be correct, etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top