PerkyforPrez
Registered User
...and "resigned" amid allegations of sexual harrassment, which he claimed were set up by players who wanted him to get fired.
Is this bon bon actually a Laker fan ?
...and "resigned" amid allegations of sexual harrassment, which he claimed were set up by players who wanted him to get fired.
Zach Trotman signed with the Boston Bruins and will forgo his senior year at LSSU. Big loss for the Lakers.
http://www.lssulakers.com/sports/m-hockey/2011-12/releases/Trotman_signs
That leaves them thin on D, but not totally unexpected. Only 3 D with significant experience going into next season, Perrault, Bruneteau, and Czuczman. Sternberg did see a fair amount of ice time late in the season and will likely be counted on even more next season. Wees is a D but they had been thinking of converting him to a forward; maybe that will change now. Drapluk will also probably see a lot of ice time early and hopefully he'll turn out to be solid. They were already looking for 1 more D for next season, now it'll be 2. Might be tough to find 2 more good D recruits this late; maybe they'll try to get a commitment from a kid who they were initially targeting for the 2013-14 season and bring him in a year early. The last potential D recruit that was in for a visit decided to go elsewhere. Roque likes to have 8 D on the roster.Your wish came true. Ferris State is the only CCHA team to win a game in the NCAA tournament. GLIAC power!!
Also Zach Trotman signed with the Boston Bruins and will forgo his senior year at LSSU. Big loss for the Lakers.
http://www.lssulakers.com/sports/m-hockey/2011-12/releases/Trotman_signs
Not sure but its not like Fairbanks made a big upgrade to tell you the truth
PerkyForPres............I know Joey from a number of dealings with him when he was a coach fro the tribe and I was with the Compuware Junior "A" team. He had some real spacey thoughts/opinions. Also, sons of two of my hockey friends played for him and were far from impressed. Just like opinions of airline experiences, we all have different experiences and hence opinions of hockey coaches. I prefer to evaluate hockey staffs rather than just head coaches along. Very seldom does a head coach have all the skill sets to be a complete coach. Part of the evaluation of a head coach is that he recognize his shortcomings and picks assistants that compliment his abilities.
I think I remember you telling us how good Borek was as a coach and we know what happen under him. I know people who know Joey as well and think the world of the guy as a coach and a person.
I don't know Joe Shawhan and I don't know what his players have thought of him when he was their coach. I also don't know if he'd even be interested in the LSSU job (should it become open) because of the circumstances under which he left. There would be a definite risk involved in hiring him though. Because of Joe being a Soo native and with all his local connections, what do you think would happen if he was hired as LSSU coach and the team didn't perform very well for several years (no better, or worse than under Jim Roque)? Unless it was for some reason other than team performance (e.g. recruiting violations, personal issues), it would be very hard for the administration to fire him because of the public uproar that would likely cause in the Soo community. They couldn't fire one of the Soo's own could they? Just something to consider.Fricker, I think Joey would be a good canditate and like I said we all have our own oppinions and it's all good. I know some players that played for him that enjoyed the experience. Again when the time does come to replace Roque I hope the administration does a broad search for his replacement.
http://www.miningjournal.net/page/c...-to-U-P--counterparts.html#.T2kH33GVtcQ.email
As the above article will show everyone, Coach Roque is the lowest paid coach in the area, let alone the CCHA. Since the Hockey staff has been cut in half since 1995, he not only coaches, but he orders equipment, helps organize events at the Taffy, and does numerous other things Red Berenson, Bob Daniels, Andy Murray, ect. would never have to do at their respective schools. LSSU has the same recruiting budget they had in the early 90s, when their were only 25-30 D-1 schools offering scholarships. Now LSSU has to compete with 58 NCAA D-1 schools as well as the numerous Canadian Universities who have added hockey. The pool of recruits is stretched that much thinner and we haven't had the cash to compete. It would be nice to see how good Coach Roque is when all he had to do is coach like the rest of his colleagues and not do 10 other jobs.
Ivy League schools don't give athletic scholarships either. Schools playing Div 1 hockey who don't give athletic scholarships are giving financial aid in some other form to their student athletes.I agree with, and have made the same points on this forum previously. However, the two issues I'd like to see solved by this staff are not money related. Namely inconsistent play, and lack of player development. I have no doubt Coach Roque and his staff have adequate knowledge and experience, but these two issues dog this program annually. I believe recruiting is going to improve with the contributions from Coach LaPrade. I want to see them do more with what they get. No one would disagree that increased funding would help, and any division one coach, including Coach Roque, deserves a competitive salary, but some things don't require more money to fix.
I wonder about your comparison to FSU. Is their budget significantly different than LSSU's?
Also, did anyone else note during the Union games this weekend the announcers stated a couple of times that Union gives no hockey scholarships. Is this true? Do they disguise them as academic or leadership scholarships?
. No one would disagree that increased funding would help, and any division one coach, including Coach Roque, deserves a competitive salary, but some things don't require more money to fix.
I wonder about your comparison to FSU. Is their budget significantly different than LSSU's?
Also, did anyone else note during the Union games this weekend the announcers stated a couple of times that Union gives no hockey scholarships. Is this true? Do they disguise them as academic or leadership scholarships?
Player development and inconsistent play are directly affected by the coach's ability to perform his duties. When the coach is constantly having to do jobs and tasks normally assigned to other staff (which LSSU does not have, such as a paid equipment manager or more than 1 athletic trainer), he cannot spend the necessary time on both of those issues. I believe that statement alone shows that both are money related.
Player development is closely tied with recruiting as well. When a plane ticket into the Soo costs $1,000 and is 1/20 of your recruiting budget, they can't afford to bring in players who are "on-the-fence". That causes LSSU to lose out on players who may come once they see our area and how special our fanbase is. Lets also be honest, Ivy League schools may not be giving out Athletic Scholarships, but we can all agree that most of there players are not paying a dime to go there whether it be "academic" or "leadership" scholarships.
You know, the school as a whole has suffered from tight budgets the past decade, so I am not suprised to see the hockey program with a tight bottom line. I wonder (out loud) if these were some of the things that both chased Jackson away -- and kept him from coming back? (Probably an obvious "yes").
And before we crown Daniels and Ferris as the new gold standard, lets all remember that Ferris wasn't exactly a power-house the last few years -- and were picked to finish in the bottom half this year. And there is not one NHL draft pick on the Bulldogs. And they still play in a half-arena with bleacher seating. And they play in not-exactly-hockey-country Big Rapids. What they did this year was pull together as a team, dig deep, and the players played at or above their presupposed abilities. I don't think Ferris has a hockey budget any larger than LSSU's.
To me, the situations look very similar.
My point: Sometimes you need to catch a break as a small program. And usually you don't.
You need, as a small program, to find a collection of players who just come together in a way nobody expected. Frank Anzalone caught a huge break when an undersized forward named Jim Dowd chose LSSU -- for whatever reason. That set off a chain reaction.
Daniels and Roque are, to me, almost identical. Daniels has had 8 winning seasons since 1992! He's had TWO NCAA appearances since 1992. Sometimes his teams are mid-table, sometimes a little lower. And twice, he's pushed a group of underachievers into the tourny. He has worked tirelessly since 1992 to improve Ferris hockey -- and its been a long, slow, frustrating ride for most Ferris fans. He got the locker rooms updated. He got the training gear updated. He got the fan area improved. But he is working within very tight financial constraints.
Should Ferris have fired Daniels five years ago? Last year? Brought in new blood? Brought in a young assistant who was hungry?
I don't know. But I suspect Daniels and Roque both know what they are dealing with at their prospective schools -- financially.
And I am curious is anyone thinks there is a different coach out there who can magically increase the LSSU budget, pay for three new full-time hockey-only staff people, increase the pay and travel allowances for the assistants?
Perhaps to a small degree that is true, but for the most part I have to disagree with you. I think that inconsistent play from the players you have, as well as how much they develop from season to season, are more reflective of how good a motivator and teacher the coach is coupled with how much the players trust and respect the coach.Player development and inconsistent play are directly affected by the coach's ability to perform his duties. When the coach is constantly having to do jobs and tasks normally assigned to other staff (which LSSU does not have, such as a paid equipment manager or more than 1 athletic trainer), he cannot spend the necessary time on both of those issues. I believe that statement alone shows that both are money related.
Great job coach and you people have the market on excuses for this administration up there. Guess when you are in the bottom division year after year you have to come up with something. You people are so predictable.
The Truth Is Out There....
TBA