Re: Lowell vs Northeastern, home and home
Oh boy.
You know, one might think it would be tiresome to be right all the time. No, no...not particularly.
The game went basically as I figured it would, although it is embarrassing to admit that I did inexplicably give the Huskies some offensive credit and predicted they would score a goal. How foolish of me. I must have forgot that Doug Carr was going to be in net. That's the only rational explanation I can come up with.
Lowell dominated every phase of the game and it was, at times, hard to watch them skate around Northeastern players with such ridiculous ease. When the Huskies did manage to get their stick on the puck the shots came from almost impossible angles or missed the net by a country mile. Carr made a half dozen or so excellent saves, but the rest of the night was JV duty against a pathetically inept offensive team.
For those of you keeping score at home:
Yes, I realize it's an absolutely absurd claim. Did Scott Wilson suddenly drop off the face of the planet? Did he transfer? Mission work in South America? Any of these scenarios would have to come to fruition before Karlsson even sniffs ROTY. Tonight's tale of the tape:
Wilson: 2-0-2/+2
Karlsson: 0-0-0/-3
I would love to be able to tell Husky fans that I failed to notice Karlsson tonight, but that would be a big fat lie. I noticed him being outworked and out-hustled to a number of pucks. I noticed his inept puck handling when NU established offensive zone possession. And I certainly noticed Derek Arnold blowing his doors off on the second Lowell goal. ROTY, eh? I'm sure against lesser teams he's a decent freshman forward and will probably make the Hockey East All Frosh team. But ROTY? You're having a laugh, we get it. For the season:
Wilson: 18GP 10-8-18 (1.00/game)
Karlsson: 19GP 8-10-18 (0.95/game)
Please make sure whoever is in charge of the trophies know it's spellled W-I-L-S-O-N. Thanks.
Moving on to Sieve-ville, population Rawlings.
But you are right about Carr and Rawlings, they are not in the same league. Rawlings is Major League compared to Single A short season for Carr.
Of the two goalies, one of them is playing at the highest level he ever will, the other one will a future pro. Here is a hint, Rawlings is the pro.
I have follow up questions. Pro in WHAT, exactly? Surely you don't mean hockey. Even when Rawlings got clean looks at the puck tonight he struggled to hold on, the one that almost trickled over his shoulder being my personal favorite. Again, stats don't lie:
Carr: 0 GA/1.00 SV%
Rawlings: 4 GA/ .875 SV%
Yeah, that right there is the definition of pro. At least he'll have that NU education to support himself when he's playing backup in the beer leagues five years from now. For the season:
Carr: 1.84/.933 (2.00/.931)
Rawlings: 2.47/.925 (2.71/.922)
There's really no way to spin this one, right? Carr is head and shoulders above Rawlings. It isn't debatable. Fact. Science.
Lastly, we come to star defensemen:
First, our D corps is so far ahead of yours its not even funny.
He goes by the name of Bitetto. And Ruhwedel should be thankful that he gets to share the ice with him. Crystal?
I'm sure anyone who watched the game tonight couldn't possibly still hold this opinion and be serious about it. Then again you support Northeastern, so being wrong is kind of par for the course at this point, eh?
Tonight's performance:
Ruhwedel: 0-1-1/+2
Bitetto: 0-0-0/-4
Minus four. Holy S. THIS is your star defenseman? THIS is the man you claim is better than Chad Ruhwedel? You wonder why nobody takes you seriously. Ridiculous, unsupportable statements made from what can only possibly be a delusional state. For the season:
Ruhwedel: 18GP 2-15-17/+5 (12 GP 2-9-11/+1)
Bitetto: 21GP 3-5-8/+3 (16GP 3-1-4 /-2)
We have a winner. Out of three ridiculous, asinine arguments, this one is officially the dumbest. Bitetto doesn't even belong shagging pucks for Ruhwedel.
Good luck tomorrow Huskies, you're gonna need it.
Lowell rules.