Fighting Sioux 23
New member
For looking at the matter again, it would perhaps be better to group as such:
1-3
4-5
6-7
8-13
14-20
In other words,
6-7: NoDak and Quinn
8-13: UMD, UMass, SCSU, MTU, OSU
Yes, I agree with that. At least tonight.
As for the last #1 seed, the more I think about it, I believe if Western or North Dakota win the NCHC Tournament, and Minnesota doesn't win the B1G, the NCHC Tourney winner would probably take down that last #1 seed. That being said, I may be prematurely discounting Quinnipiac's chances.
Numbers said:As for the comment about comparisons of interest going according to RPI...I was referring to comparisons in which both teams are currently top-20. And, my rational for that was that losing one comparison against RPI doesn't drop you in the list order. So, Prov over Den doesn't drop DU to 4th, for example.
I see. I was looking at teams that are currently top-25. ; )
What I am interested in though, is how the committee will handle Overtime Wins/Losses as it pertains to the Common Opponents portion of the Pairwise comparison. Right now, Cornell wins the comparison with North Dakota, thanks to their "1-0-0" record against Quinnipiac (the only common opponent between the programs) while UND went 1-1-0 against QU. But Cornell's victory was in OT. If QU beats Cornell in their rematch, will the Common Opponent portion tie with 1-1-0 records? Or, will UND win that component with a true 1-1-0 record, compared to Cornell's true 0.55-1.45-0 record (factoring in the anticipated weight for overtime wins). That will dictate who wins that comparison. Of course, as you noted in your post, it may be immaterial and not change the rankings.