Re: HEA QF's: #5 'Mack @ #4 Maine
Was Diamond grabbing Bly's facemask and tearing it away from his face pathetic too? Don't let the facts on both sides get in the way of a good argument though.
As for the Abbott thing, I think a lot of the jousting in the circles was mutual for the weekend, and a majority probably initiated by MC. I'm not going to go back and watch every scrum, but I would be we'd see a lot of mutual pushing shoving slashing. Toomey clearly gave it to Abbott pretty good, but the refs tend to take the thinking out and just put them both in the box. Tough call on Abbott but the track record is to give matching penalties (see games 1 and 2).
Did you actually see either of these plays?
Abbott is a guy that had collected 21 minors, 0 majors and 0 misconducts in 146 games played going into this weekend. That's roughly 1 minor every 7 games played. In other words, if Spencer received 2 minor penalties in a month, that's a lack of discipline for him. If you only get about 5 penalties per year, I'm guessing his reputation for embellishing isn't all too extensive. And as a top 6 forward on this team since his freshman year, I'm guessing this weekend wasn't the first time a team jousted, antagonized or targeted him in some way. And yet he managed to get two embellishment calls and his first career misconduct within two games!
Gee wiz, he must have woke up on the wrong side of the bed and suddenly turned into a diving soccer player with an anger problem! Certainly nothing fishy here.
And I'd like for you to explain this to me with the Diamond/Bly incident... I recognize that Joey's name is a curse word around the league, but on that particular play, he came in and finished his run of the mill check, and when he turned to skate away.... "holding" doesn't do Bly justice. That was half of a rowdy roddy piper sleeper hold. AND YET. Even the firey, antagonistic, retaliatory Diamond didn't retaliate UNTIL?? The Ref blew the play dead....skated over and motioned that BOTH players were going to the box.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0105d/0105d4d364e81077443e2ccf09dd58bb3b6a1efa" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7079e/7079e2364c7e6bc9a509f3429fba1fa1c93d7548" alt="Eek! :eek: :eek:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0105d/0105d4d364e81077443e2ccf09dd58bb3b6a1efa" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"
This goes back to the analogy: If you're in the stands and someone punches you in the face, and the cops are going to come over, charge YOU with assault and dole you the same punishment as the dude who punched you whether you retaliate or not, then where is your incentive to not retaliate. It's the opposite of logic: If you're going to force someone to do the time, they may as well commit the crime! You know, get your money's worth....
But here's the kicker!!....
When they assessed the penalties, they didn't assess Joey 2 and 5. JUST 5. Which means that had he not fulfilled the officials prophecy by going ahead and acting in frustration AFTER being signaled to the box before retaliating and after being held by the neck, they were going to send him even if he DIDNT facemask Bly. So here's my question: WHAT WERE THEY SENDING HIM FOR?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0105d/0105d4d364e81077443e2ccf09dd58bb3b6a1efa" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0105d/0105d4d364e81077443e2ccf09dd58bb3b6a1efa" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0105d/0105d4d364e81077443e2ccf09dd58bb3b6a1efa" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"