Sure it's early, but I like this development. I also noticed that BU tied Union tonight. I wonder how next week's polls will look.Doesn't mean much right now, but Harvard is #1 in the Pairwise right now.
Sure it's early, but I like this development. I also noticed that BU tied Union tonight. I wonder how next week's polls will look.
I thought about that as well - missed the game as I was in DC visiting with friends who are not, unfortunately, college hockey fans. Still had a good time.
At this point, I'm not worried about Pairwise or KRACH or any other measurement. Realize that we won't be playing any NCAA tournament games at Bright-Landry so it doesn't matter a whole lot except for seeding purposes and location. Obviously we want to be playing in the East as a high seed but frankly, if we play to our strengths and skate for 60 minutes, I like our chances.
Agreed. Want us to get and stay healthy. Kerfoot is critical. Jaw and Blackwell are important.
Be interesting to see who laces them up against Yale. We owe them!
We sure do! Agree about Kerfoot and Blackwell. Less so regarding Jaw although after watching Guiltanan against RPI, I may rethink that premise. They may be holding Blackwell back for later in January to keep him as healthy as possible for the stretch run. Concussions are tricky and nothing to fool with.
I get so frustrated with Guiltanan, every time he is on the ice I hold my breath waiting for a penalty. Would much prefer him out of the lineup. Do others think his play is worth the PM he put out last year?
Harvard wins 4-2 (eng).
National audience and given Harvard's ranking, I am sure that many will take some of the game in to see if Harvard is for real.
Yale has played 2 games since Harvard last played, including a 3-2 loss to Nortgeastern in which they squandered a 2-0 lead. Yale will be hungry!
I get so frustrated with Guiltanan, every time he is on the ice I hold my breath waiting for a penalty. Would much prefer him out of the lineup. Do others think his play is worth the PM he put out last year?
I don't see Harvard all the time, but I see them at least a few games a year, and I've always considered Vesey a good sized forward. Vesey's 6'-3", 203 lbs. There are only 2 other guys (D-men) bigger on the team and only one other forward as tall as 6'-3". What do you consider to be a big forward?That kind of intimidation helps players like Jimmy Vesey and Alex Kerfoot who are not big forwards.
I don't see Harvard all the time, but I see them at least a few games a year, and I've always considered Vesey a good sized forward. Vesey's 6'-3", 203 lbs. There are only 2 other guys (D-men) bigger on the team and only one other forward as tall as 6'-3". What do you consider to be a big forward?
I don't see Harvard all the time, but I see them at least a few games a year, and I've always considered Vesey a good sized forward. Vesey's 6'-3", 203 lbs. There are only 2 other guys (D-men) bigger on the team and only one other forward as tall as 6'-3". What do you consider to be a big forward?
Vesey is a big guy. Of course it's not his role to initiate contact, and he rarely does.
That's disappointing about Kerfoot, he is really needed down the stretch. I don't think Harvard is #1 Pairwise without him.
Excited to see how it goes against Yale. And I really hope the team can be back to full strength by the Beanpot.
It says he is on his Bio, and the Harvard Roster. Anyway, I've seen him a number of times and always thought he's a big kid. More of a Kris Kolanos than an Alex Tuch, but good size just the same. Either way... the kid can play.Vesey not 6'3" or would have been a first rounder with his skill set
It says he is on his Bio, and the Harvard Roster. Anyway, I've seen him a number of times and always thought he's a big kid. More of a Kris Kolanos than an Alex Tuch, but good size just the same. Either way... the kid can play.