What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Gulf Oil Spill 2010

Re: Gulf Oil Spill 2010

Why? Manson killed some people and got life in prison. The CEO of BP is responsible for just as many deaths, and billions of dollars in environmental damage, and he got an apology.

You really don't see the difference? :eek:
 
Re: Gulf Oil Spill 2010

lol...the evil CEO baby killer argument! Can't have a political thread without some mention of murder.

Anyone else seeing what our friends in the ethonal industry are doing? Leveraging this incident to try and push the E15 mandate? They claim to displace petrol, but the fact is their product depends on petrol. What does that mean for you? An inferior fuel for your cars. A product proven to degrade components in older lawnmowers, and other farm equipment as well as some cars. Did I mention your gas mileage will get worse? (burning a fuel with lower BTUs means you need to fill up more).

So the farm subsidies...errr Corn Ethanol Scammers just want their share and are using this BP incident to get attention. Pathetic..maybe the only thing worse than kicking a few babies ;)
 
Re: Gulf Oil Spill 2010

lol...the evil CEO baby killer argument! Can't have a political thread without some mention of murder.

Anyone else seeing what our friends in the ethonal industry are doing? Leveraging this incident to try and push the E15 mandate? They claim to displace petrol, but the fact is their product depends on petrol. What does that mean for you? An inferior fuel for your cars. A product proven to degrade components in older lawnmowers, and other farm equipment as well as some cars. Did I mention your gas mileage will get worse? (burning a fuel with lower BTUs means you need to fill up more).

So the farm subsidies...errr Corn Ethanol Scammers just want their share and are using this BP incident to get attention. Pathetic..maybe the only thing worse than kicking a few babies ;)

Greed kills. No two ways about it. Corn Ethanol has to be one of the least efficient forms of energy ever devised. And the gubbermint keeps pumping the money in.
 
Re: Gulf Oil Spill 2010

lol...the evil CEO baby killer argument! Can't have a political thread without some mention of murder.

Anyone else seeing what our friends in the ethonal industry are doing? Leveraging this incident to try and push the E15 mandate? They claim to displace petrol, but the fact is their product depends on petrol. What does that mean for you? An inferior fuel for your cars. A product proven to degrade components in older lawnmowers, and other farm equipment as well as some cars. Did I mention your gas mileage will get worse? (burning a fuel with lower BTUs means you need to fill up more).

So the farm subsidies...errr Corn Ethanol Scammers just want their share and are using this BP incident to get attention. Pathetic..maybe the only thing worse than kicking a few babies ;)

So you're saying the corn farmers and ADM are equivalent to Charles Manson? :p
 
Re: Gulf Oil Spill 2010

SHouldn't the attention be on stopping the leak and cleaning it up? Congress doesn't have all the facts yet so why waste time trying to prosecute the guy. Hang'em for I care after the leak is stopped.

E15 is close, they been pushing it for awhile, rumor is its coming to Maine.? Why only 15%, why not more ethanol? 15% is all present day equipment can handle. Some Gas stations in New England have already had to upgrade piping in order to handle E10. I wonder who ended up paying for that:rolleyes:
 
Re: Gulf Oil Spill 2010

the number I am finding is 17 billion dollars in subsidies over the past 5 years from myself, all of you, and even Todd Bertizzi.

(good lord, a Bertuzzi reference one post after a baby kicking reference? when do I get banned?)
 
Re: Gulf Oil Spill 2010

Why? Manson killed some people and got life in prison. The CEO of BP is responsible for just as many deaths, and billions of dollars in environmental damage, and he got an apology.

scary post. Manson MEANT to kill people. Tony Hayward did not want this to happen.
 
Re: Gulf Oil Spill 2010

scary post. Manson MEANT to kill people. Tony Hayward did not want this to happen.

That explains why he turned a blind eye to the 760 violations the company has accumulated (to ExxonMobil's one) and why 30 workers were killed and more than 200 injured in "accidents" before this most recent one.

Of course, we've de-criminalized such activity. How can we possibly hold one person accountable for the deaths of others at the hands of a corporation? Sure, if a guy goes frickin' insane and kills nine people, we can lock him up for life; but if a corporation kills even more people, we say how horrible it is but we don't hold anyone accountable.

Manson is in jail for life for his crimes.
Hayward got an apology for his.
 
Re: Gulf Oil Spill 2010

So he wanted an oil rig to blow up, have 6 people die, have his company lose all their money, and have his named dragged through the dirt?

*Not that he doesn't fully deserve the last two*

Companies do Risk Management. Or they should.

It is clear BP was negligent in this case. It is up to a court to decide if that negligence cause the death of those people. If it did then BP and Tony are culpable for said deaths.

Lack of Risk Management is what has caused a huge uptick in the public on the subject of oversight and whether there is any. In the case of the bank failure and now in the case of the oil rig.

Right on, Priceless. Right on.
 
Re: Gulf Oil Spill 2010

Companies do Risk Management. Or they should..

Whatever they did, didn't work. And we still don't know what happened for sure and everyone knows nothing is going to happen to Tony. He'll lose his job with a 100 million dollar going away quietly bonus
 
Re: Gulf Oil Spill 2010

Companies do Risk Management. Or they should.

It is clear BP was negligent in this case. It is up to a court to decide if that negligence cause the death of those people. If it did then BP and Tony are culpable for said deaths.

Lack of Risk Management is what has caused a huge uptick in the public on the subject of oversight and whether there is any. In the case of the bank failure and now in the case of the oil rig.

Right on, Priceless. Right on.

And I won't argue with any of that. However, Manson SET OUT to kill people, that was his goal. Hayward was negligent, knowing his actions COULD kill people.


Both are despicable, but they are not the same.
 
Re: Gulf Oil Spill 2010

And I won't argue with any of that. However, Manson SET OUT to kill people, that was his goal. Hayward was negligent, knowing his actions COULD kill people.


Both are despicable, but they are not the same.

Well said. People are far to quick to blithely make this sort of far-fetched comparison.
 
Re: Gulf Oil Spill 2010

And I won't argue with any of that. However, Manson SET OUT to kill people, that was his goal. Hayward was negligent, knowing his actions COULD kill people.


Both are despicable, but they are not the same.

That's fine. But what I was responding to was this:

scary post. Manson MEANT to kill people. Tony Hayward did not want this to happen.

And sorry but huskyfan cannot know that. If Tony took the risk in the spirit of profit than Tony WISHED it wouldn't happen. I'd equate it to a drunk driver. A drunk driver doesn't want to get in an accident but he/she is not doing everything in their power not to get in one cause they drove the car.

Well, Tony drove the car drunk in this case. I don't think there is any question about that.
 
Back
Top