Whites. They have a grey uniform which uniformly has been horrible to them.Gold/Yellow/Maize as the road "jersey" is actually banned by the NCAA rules (2 minute penalty to start each period i believe) - you can thank former Maine Coach Shawn Walsh for that (I have a suspicion that he or one of his players in 1993 was color blind) maize vs white is very tough to distinguish on a B&W tv for example. - how I came to my hypothesis.
Was Lowell wearing their whites, or a special dark colored uniform at home?
Now there are exception to the above rule, as in season tourneys, or when teams expressly give their permission.
Michigan as road in Maize did beat MSU in home white in the 2014 GLI final, for example
Was Lowell wearing their whites, or a special dark colored uniform at home?e
IIRC Lowell was wearing white for those games. Lowell has on a couple of occasions worn blue at home in the last couple of years, usually along with some kind of special promotion (I remember the BC home game last year was a "blue out" and they gave away a blue t-shirt to everyone to wear) but I don't recall a QU game being one of them.
White was the original home jersey. Then they introduced the alternate golds. For a while they were wearing white on Friday and gold on Saturday. In 2013 they starting wearing the gold exclusively during the 21 game unbeaten streak. They also debuted the new gold jersey after their loss to SLU that year. I think they wore white once this year.
...Having poor quality people on the broadcast does nothing for the sport. It misrepresents the product. If you have very good people doing something, people who are enthusiastic and knowledgeable that is a better sell than guys who are biased and have no idea of the sport's landscape...
...I've not been in a city holding the Frozen Four but I like to think its front page in the sports section. ANYTHING that can be done to raise awareness, promote promote promote.
the average American knows there is professional hockey. other than the Stanley Cup it's not on the radar. college hockey isn't even in the room with the radar scope. they have a small but dedicated following. if the teams, the NCAA and ESPN want the sport to grow they must promote it. if you are old enough you remember when there was no "March Madness" - just a championship game. no brackets, no wall to wall TV coverage, no special ads just for the tournament. there was no Super Bowl and all its hoopla. college hockey sadly needs marketing and promotion. a few catchy promos in the BB tournament would help. some talk on Sports Center leading up would be good. pushing articles into the sports press would help. ads in SI?
USA today? I've not been in a city holding the Frozen Four but I like to think its front page in the sports section. ANYTHING that can be done to raise awareness, promote promote promote.
the average American knows there is professional hockey. other than the Stanley Cup it's not on the radar. college hockey isn't even in the room with the radar scope. they have a small but dedicated following. if the teams, the NCAA and ESPN want the sport to grow they must promote it. if you are old enough you remember when there was no "March Madness" - just a championship game. no brackets, no wall to wall TV coverage, no special ads just for the tournament. there was no Super Bowl and all its hoopla. college hockey sadly needs marketing and promotion. a few catchy promos in the BB tournament would help. some talk on Sports Center leading up would be good. pushing articles into the sports press would help. ads in SI?
USA today? I've not been in a city holding the Frozen Four but I like to think its front page in the sports section. ANYTHING that can be done to raise awareness, promote promote promote.
the average American knows there is professional hockey. other than the Stanley Cup it's not on the radar. college hockey isn't even in the room with the radar scope. they have a small but dedicated following. if the teams, the NCAA and ESPN want the sport to grow they must promote it.
Here is my counter argument to not using Bucci and Melrose: They are the FACE of hockey on ESPN. If there is a hockey game being called by them, the casual viewer would consider it more important than if someone who knows the college game better but doesn't have the national exposure.
Why would they want the sport to grow? The NCAA doesn't want the competition to its March Madness Money Machine and ESPN doesn't care if the ratings are .2 or .5 they are still only doing it because they have to in order to get the only part of the contract they care about.
Barely heard about FF where I live when it was in Boston. Fairly active youth hockey and Jr hockey here. No marketing occured that I can remember. I didn't even attempt to go. It was way to expensive to consider and I wouldn't have been able to get the time off. I have watched on TV every time I can.
Marketing is all about making people want something they may not need. If I were to tell someone they could watch a car drive around in a circle 500 times who would be excited? They hype it and people live to watch folks drive around in circles. They have created the demand for sports that are like watching paint dry. The lack of effort is the reason it doesn't fly.
Bingo. I really got hooked on college hockey about 3 years ago and went to my first FF that year. The atmosphere in the Gahden was off the charts. Sat next to a family from Wisconsin that go every year. Watching (it s*cks to) BU lose and the way they lost was icing on the cake. Any mention in the media was almost a passing thought even with a team from Boston playing.Barely heard about FF where I live when it was in Boston.