You Socialist!This.
If we make the assumption that the people applying are qualifying for the program then they are getting benefits because they are in need.
Wonder how soon most of southern Europe will be Muslim? Then what? Will the national government(s) grow a set or capitulate?
I believe JP Morgan Chase currently employs over 260,000 people and in the go-go year of 2009 paid over $27 billion in total compensation. I can't say how much lower those numbers would be if the relationship between JP and the government were different but they'd be lower.
Now, not all of those 260k people work in the US and we can't assume the definition of benefits so they aren't paying US taxes on the full $27 billion...but could we agree the employees pay 10% of that amount in federal taxes and at least 150k of them are in the US?
And could we agree that of the % that isn't paid in US taxes by US employees, some of it gets spent on goods and services in the US?
Now I know I'm getting dangerously close to the definition of "trickle down"...but I just cant bring myself to think that they keep 100% of what they don't pay in federal taxes in a coffee can in the back yard. The savings rates in this country are so high, I know I'm spitting into the wind on this one.
So, maybe some of it gets paid in local taxes? Can't really avoid those. Maybe some goes to pay for clothes, food, car repair, mortgages, plumbers, cell phones and the like? Possible?
C'mon now, Economics 101: everyone's wants exceed their resources. "In need" has become so watered down today, everyone "needs" cable TV and everyone "needs" a car.
People receiving government assistance are buying pre-packaged, already prepared meals to heat up in their microwaves! When I was "in need" I joined a food cooperative in which we purchased everything in bulk, baked our own bread, shared communal meals, etc etc etc.
Those are the cheapest foods. You want to buy different food and it's a lot more expensive. You can get a hamburger at McDonald's for 79 cents (and they'll serve it to you in less than a minute!) whereas if you want a salad it'll cost three or four times as much. If you have a limited budget, which are you going to buy?C'mon now, Economics 101: everyone's wants exceed their resources. "In need" has become so watered down today, everyone "needs" cable TV and everyone "needs" a car.
People receiving government assistance are buying pre-packaged, already prepared meals to heat up in their microwaves!
.So I was watching Duck Tales last week and I noticed that not only is it a story about the wacky adventures of Donald's Uncle and his nephews but is actually a statement about job creators in this country. Uncle Scrooge never needed handouts from the government (nor did his rich mortal enemy Dromgold) he just picked himself up by his bootstraps (with a little help from his lucky dime of course) and came to America and made enough money to swim in it! That should be our monetary policy let people get so blindingly rich they can go on madcap misadventures with their relatives and their only worry is that people will steal their money!! (those ****ed Beagle Boys!) If only The Beagle's and Magica Despell would stop expecting handouts and would work hard they could be just like Scrooge!!
Then I went even deeper, you ever notice you never meet Donald's mother who is supposed to be Scrooge's sister? And you never meet Huey, Duey and Luey's parents who are Donald's siblings? Obviously Disney was making a statement about the middle class and their inability to work as a Nuclear Family and they can only survive by the grace of their rich relatives...which is why Scrooge so graciously takes them in!
Next up...I plan to watch Dumbo and see what hidden messages (besides of course the racism...cause I be done seen 'bout ev'rything when I see an elephant fly!) I can find in there! Disney really knew his stuff!![]()
From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.
So I was watching Duck Tales last week
You just HAD to get that song stuck in my head, didn't you... -_-
Well, I'm not letting it go to waste.
Life is like a hurricane here in Duckburgh,
Race cars, lasers, aeroplanes, it's a duck blur...
Might solve a mystery...
Or re-write history...
DuckTales! WOOHOO!
Ev'ry day they're out there making...
DuckTales! WOOHOO!
Tales of daring do bad and good...
Luck tales! WOOHOO!
I'd probably take that bet.Most people don't realize that when Marx exhorted the workers of the world to "arise and cast off their chains," he was describing chains imposed by a government that represented the well-connected at the expense of the general public. Marx was suspicious of any government power; his "ideal" situation involved the "withering away of the state." Were he active in US politics today, my bet is that he'd be an ardent TEA party supporter, as the messages resonate: the powerful and well-connected are using the tools of government to oppress the rest of us.
That's a very apt description of a family, or a tribe, or a community, and a very ineffective way to run a government. It's what I've been trying to frame all along, the idea that what is healthy for society to embrace voluntarily is not at all the way forcibly to run a government.
This kind of insular thinking makes me nuts. Maybe you are lucky and haven't been exposed to that many people who are in trouble. That makes it easy to dismiss need and blame them or others for their need. Not everyone is willfully in need. I believe it is better to give the fishing rod than a fish but I also know that in some cases while you are teaching the person to fish you need to support them.C'mon now, Economics 101: everyone's wants exceed their resources. "In need" has become so watered down today, everyone "needs" cable TV and everyone "needs" a car.
People receiving government assistance are buying pre-packaged, already prepared meals to heat up in their microwaves! When I was "in need" I joined a food cooperative in which we purchased everything in bulk, baked our own bread, shared communal meals, etc etc etc.
I'm all for helping people who most need help; it's just that we have moved the fulcrum way way way too far, in two ways: people who'd "like to have" some help have migrated into the "need" column where they don't "really" belong, and more importantly to me, people who once needed temporary assistance to get back into self-reliance now find they can remain on assistance indefinitely.
You are a parent, no?? Do you really want your children to remain stuck in adolescence for the entirety of their lives? Or do you want them to grow up into self-reliant, capable, competent, productive adults capable of taking responsibility for their own life choices?
If the latter, then why would you want anything less for anyone else?
This kind of insular thinking makes me nuts. Maybe you are lucky and haven't been exposed to that many people who are in trouble.