Re: Elections 2012: Congressional and Gubernatorial
Nice try sparky, but I'm not comparing Gore's service to McCain's but I'm not sure why you'd care as a GWB supporter. Clearly his people starting a whispering campaign against the old codger doesn't bother you too much. Odd, but whatever.
I'm more talking about how Gore who openly admitted the nature of his participation in Vietnam was somehow "not enough of a veteran" while GWB keeping the skies over Texas safe from the Viet Cong while skipping half his duties to work on a poltical campaign was the height of service to his country. Makes sense in hindsight, seeing how Romney equated his son working on his campaign to military service. Tell me Opie, is that your view too (work on GOP campaign = same as being in armed forces)? Funny people you choose to support.
Flying a small plane, especially a jet interceptor, over water at night is dangerous, under any circumstances. Just ask JFK, jr. You and the rest of the libstains act like flying a fighter jet (whether for the National Guard or off the deck of a carrier) is child's play. Anyone can do it. You wouldn't last a day. I know I wouldn't have. But George W. Bush or Al Gore or Rusty Calley or Sgt. York aren't the issue here. The issue, despite your strenuous efforts to change the subject, is John Kerry.
This will be difficult for a lying punk to understand, but I'll try anyway: I'm not responsible for what anyone, anywhere says about anything, only for what I say. It's guilt by association to blame me for what others say. And that includes George W. Bush, who last time I looked wasn't on a ballot this time around. And I'm not familiar with the quote you attribute to Romney so I can't comment. I would, however, prefer to know the context of the remark and not rely on you for an accurate assessment.
I grew up with libstains who said it was guilt by association to question the patriotism of people who "just went to a couple of meetings in college." But somehow in your mind that benefit of the doubt doesn't apply to me. I'm responsible for what Akin says and any of the other Republican ding bats? Horse sh*t.
Military service is not a punchline. You don't know anything about it except what you've seen in the movies. Al Gore served honorably, so far as I know. The problem was his lack of honesty about it. If he'd said he joined the Army to help his anti-war father's re-election chances, that would be true and honorable. Instead, he said he went because "he didn't want some other young man to go in his place." If that were the case, then he probably should have served a full tour in 'Nam, and not just showed up (with his bodyguard) for a cup of coffee. The only sacrifice he likely made was having to stand in line for chow. The casualty rates for Army journalists behind the lines was quite low.
This business about medals can be maddening. Take the Purple Heart. Former Senator Max Cleland lost his legs in Vietnam but was not awarded a Purple Heart--his horrific injuries did not occur as a result of enemy action. Whereas, getting a minor wound, that requires Bactine and a bandaid to treat,
can earn you a Purple Heart if it was caused by the enemy.
You also have to differentiate between officers and enlisteds. It's well known that officers sometimes give each other "gentlemen's" medals. Take LBJ. He wore a lapel pin all of his life which represented the Silver Star. Turns out what he did to "earn" that medal was take one flight, as a passenger, over a specified area. I don't begruge LBJ the decoration, but it's doubtful if there were any privates on that flight, they were similarly honored.
Al Gore served honoably. John Kerry served honorably. George W. Bush served honorably. John McCain served honorably. Bill Clinton dodged the draft. And you want to change the subject and confuse the issue. The issue is John Kerry. And what sets Kerry apart from these others is the dishonor he heaped on tens of thousand of other honorable people in order to launch his political career. You find that unremarkable. I find it unforgiveable.