Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!
so far most of the comments about Romney's choice of Ryan for running mate view it through the lens of political calculation. At heart, Romney is a business person involved in politics; he's not a career politician.
When viewed from the lens of business, the Ryan choice fits pretty well, especially when you go beyond the election into actual governing:
> Romney is the turn-around expert; Ryan is the budget guru: big picture + details
> Romney can concentrate on government reorganization; Ryan can concentrate on day-to-day budget.
> Romney can remain "Presidential" and appear totally above the fray; Ryan as "attack dog" is somewhat amusing because his personal style is so folksy and congenial.
> Romney is a bit wooden on the stump, though he definitely is improving; Ryan's 'aw shucks' style really engages his audience and can be quite effective
> Romney and Ryan have a positive message of something meaningfully greater than themselves that they stand "for." Obama and Biden still have not crafted a positive message (raise taxes on the rich and increase government spending: is that really they best they can do?)
I loved Romney's latest line: "I want to increase Americans' after-tax incomes." that is a brilliant way to frame the issue, put it in practical terms on how it concretely affects people in their daily lives.
They know they are going to be subject to disparagement and vilification anyway; now they can say, "you'l probably hear the Democrats say [whatever], that's to be expected." they can tell people what the attacks will be before the attacks even occur!
so far most of the comments about Romney's choice of Ryan for running mate view it through the lens of political calculation. At heart, Romney is a business person involved in politics; he's not a career politician.
When viewed from the lens of business, the Ryan choice fits pretty well, especially when you go beyond the election into actual governing:
> Romney is the turn-around expert; Ryan is the budget guru: big picture + details
> Romney can concentrate on government reorganization; Ryan can concentrate on day-to-day budget.
> Romney can remain "Presidential" and appear totally above the fray; Ryan as "attack dog" is somewhat amusing because his personal style is so folksy and congenial.
> Romney is a bit wooden on the stump, though he definitely is improving; Ryan's 'aw shucks' style really engages his audience and can be quite effective
> Romney and Ryan have a positive message of something meaningfully greater than themselves that they stand "for." Obama and Biden still have not crafted a positive message (raise taxes on the rich and increase government spending: is that really they best they can do?)
I loved Romney's latest line: "I want to increase Americans' after-tax incomes." that is a brilliant way to frame the issue, put it in practical terms on how it concretely affects people in their daily lives.
They know they are going to be subject to disparagement and vilification anyway; now they can say, "you'l probably hear the Democrats say [whatever], that's to be expected." they can tell people what the attacks will be before the attacks even occur!